Prognostic value of hypertension timing for survival in glioblastoma patients receiving bevacizumab: a retrospective single centre analysis.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-09 DOI:10.1007/s11060-025-05209-4
Irfan Kesumayadi, Atsushi Kambe, Hidefumi Amisaki, Tomohiro Hosoya, Makoto Sakamoto, Masamichi Kurosaki
{"title":"Prognostic value of hypertension timing for survival in glioblastoma patients receiving bevacizumab: a retrospective single centre analysis.","authors":"Irfan Kesumayadi, Atsushi Kambe, Hidefumi Amisaki, Tomohiro Hosoya, Makoto Sakamoto, Masamichi Kurosaki","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-05209-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypertension, the most common adverse events associated with bevacizumab (BEV) treatment, has been proposed as a potential biomarker of treatment response in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether the timing of hypertension serves as a prognostic value in GBM patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study consisting of 56 GBM patients treated with initial BEV between 2013 and 2024. Blood pressure was monitored peri-infusion of BEV (before and 60 min after). Patients were grouped into normotension, pre-existing hypertension (before first BEV infusion), and BEV-induced hypertension, further classified as early new-onset (≤ 3 cycles) or late-onset (> 3 cycles). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen (36.6%) patients had pre-existing hypertension, while 26 (63.4%) were normotensive at baseline. Among the normotensive patients, twelve (46.1%) developed early new-onset hypertension, and 13 (50%) developed late-onset hypertension. Patients with pre-existing hypertension demonstrated significantly longer median OS compared to normotensive patients (32 vs. 22 months, p = 0.043). Early new-onset hypertension was also associated with improved OS compared to patients who remained normotensive after three cycles (25 vs. 16 months, p = 0.003). Additionally, patients with pre-existing and early new-onset hypertension showed longer OS compared to those with late-onset hypertension (25 vs. 14 months, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Monitoring blood pressure during peri-infusion of BEV could be useful in predicting treatment response for GBM patients. Pre-existing or early new-onset hypertension is associated with improved survival, suggesting that timing of hypertension has a potential role as a biomarker for BEV efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1425-1433"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05209-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hypertension, the most common adverse events associated with bevacizumab (BEV) treatment, has been proposed as a potential biomarker of treatment response in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether the timing of hypertension serves as a prognostic value in GBM patients.

Methods: This retrospective study consisting of 56 GBM patients treated with initial BEV between 2013 and 2024. Blood pressure was monitored peri-infusion of BEV (before and 60 min after). Patients were grouped into normotension, pre-existing hypertension (before first BEV infusion), and BEV-induced hypertension, further classified as early new-onset (≤ 3 cycles) or late-onset (> 3 cycles). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Fifteen (36.6%) patients had pre-existing hypertension, while 26 (63.4%) were normotensive at baseline. Among the normotensive patients, twelve (46.1%) developed early new-onset hypertension, and 13 (50%) developed late-onset hypertension. Patients with pre-existing hypertension demonstrated significantly longer median OS compared to normotensive patients (32 vs. 22 months, p = 0.043). Early new-onset hypertension was also associated with improved OS compared to patients who remained normotensive after three cycles (25 vs. 16 months, p = 0.003). Additionally, patients with pre-existing and early new-onset hypertension showed longer OS compared to those with late-onset hypertension (25 vs. 14 months, p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Monitoring blood pressure during peri-infusion of BEV could be useful in predicting treatment response for GBM patients. Pre-existing or early new-onset hypertension is associated with improved survival, suggesting that timing of hypertension has a potential role as a biomarker for BEV efficacy.

接受贝伐单抗治疗的胶质母细胞瘤患者高血压时间的预后价值:一项回顾性单中心分析。
高血压是与贝伐单抗(BEV)治疗相关的最常见不良事件,已被提出作为胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者治疗反应的潜在生物标志物。本研究旨在评估高血压发病时间是否对GBM患者有预后价值。方法:本回顾性研究包括2013年至2024年间56例首次BEV治疗的GBM患者。监测BEV输注前后(输注前和输注后60 min)血压。将患者分为血压正常、既往高血压(首次BEV输注前)和BEV所致高血压,并进一步分为新发早期(≤3个周期)和晚发(≤3个周期)。采用Kaplan-Meier法评估总生存期(OS)。结果:15例(36.6%)患者既往存在高血压,26例(63.4%)患者基线血压正常。在血压正常的患者中,早期新发高血压12例(46.1%),迟发性高血压13例(50%)。与血压正常的患者相比,既往高血压患者的中位生存期明显更长(32个月vs 22个月,p = 0.043)。与三个周期后血压保持正常的患者相比,早期新发高血压也与改善的OS相关(25个月vs. 16个月,p = 0.003)。此外,与迟发性高血压患者相比,已有高血压和早期新发高血压患者的生存期更长(25个月vs 14个月,p = 0.002)。结论:BEV输注期间监测血压可用于预测GBM患者的治疗反应。既往高血压或早期新发高血压与生存率提高相关,提示高血压发病时间作为BEV疗效的生物标志物具有潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信