Vishalie Shah, Andrew M Jones, Ivana Malenica, Taufik Hidayat, Noemi Kreif
{"title":"Using Policy Learning to Inform Health Insurance Targeting: A Case Study of Indonesia.","authors":"Vishalie Shah, Andrew M Jones, Ivana Malenica, Taufik Hidayat, Noemi Kreif","doi":"10.1002/hec.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper demonstrates how optimal policy learning can inform the targeted allocation of Indonesia's two subsidized health insurance programmes. Using national survey data, we develop policy rules aimed at minimizing \"catastrophic health expenditure\" among enrollees of APBD or APBN, the two government-funded schemes. Employing a super learner ensemble approach, we use regression and machine learning methods of varying complexity to estimate conditional average treatment effects and construct policy rules to optimize program benefits, both with and without budget constraints. We find that the financial impact of APBD enrollment over APBN differs with household characteristics, particularly demographic composition, socioeconomic status, and geography. Households assigned to APBD under the policy rule are typically urban-based with better facilities, whereas rural households with less accessible healthcare are assigned to APBN-a pattern intensified under budget constraints. Both constrained and unconstrained optimal policy assignments show lower expected catastrophic expenditure risk than the current assignment strategy. This study contributes to the literature on heterogeneous treatment effects, optimal policy leaning, and health financing in developing countries, showcasing data-driven solutions for more equitable resource allocation in public health insurance contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper demonstrates how optimal policy learning can inform the targeted allocation of Indonesia's two subsidized health insurance programmes. Using national survey data, we develop policy rules aimed at minimizing "catastrophic health expenditure" among enrollees of APBD or APBN, the two government-funded schemes. Employing a super learner ensemble approach, we use regression and machine learning methods of varying complexity to estimate conditional average treatment effects and construct policy rules to optimize program benefits, both with and without budget constraints. We find that the financial impact of APBD enrollment over APBN differs with household characteristics, particularly demographic composition, socioeconomic status, and geography. Households assigned to APBD under the policy rule are typically urban-based with better facilities, whereas rural households with less accessible healthcare are assigned to APBN-a pattern intensified under budget constraints. Both constrained and unconstrained optimal policy assignments show lower expected catastrophic expenditure risk than the current assignment strategy. This study contributes to the literature on heterogeneous treatment effects, optimal policy leaning, and health financing in developing countries, showcasing data-driven solutions for more equitable resource allocation in public health insurance contexts.
期刊介绍:
This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems.
Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses.
Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.