Migraine in the workplace: Work productivity impact in a large US-based healthcare system using a cross-sectional employee survey.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-08 DOI:10.1111/head.15053
Olivia Begasse de Dhaem, Allison Verhaak, Meghan Fajardo, Brian Grosberg
{"title":"Migraine in the workplace: Work productivity impact in a large US-based healthcare system using a cross-sectional employee survey.","authors":"Olivia Begasse de Dhaem, Allison Verhaak, Meghan Fajardo, Brian Grosberg","doi":"10.1111/head.15053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>(1) To estimate the impact of migraine on work productivity among employees at a large healthcare system in the United States. (2) To assess the knowledge and perception of migraine among employees and to evaluate the number of employees interested in receiving migraine care to help plan a future workplace migraine education and management program.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advances in treatment, migraine is underdiagnosed and undertreated and remains a leading cause of disability in the world. Workplace migraine education and/or management programs have been shown to improve migraine-related productivity. However, there has not yet been a published organization-wide workplace migraine education and management program in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional, online survey of employees at a large healthcare system in the Northeast region of the United States that was open from November 1, 2024, to January 3, 2025. Survey questions queried employment status (one question), knowledge and perceptions of migraine (two questions), headache and migraine screen (four questions), productivity impact (two questions), and potential interest in receiving care for headaches (one question).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 33,761 employees, 20,000 were reached via internal communication, 6583 (32.9%) agreed to participate, and 5771 (28.9%) completed the survey. The majority of employees who chose to complete the survey (5337/5771; 92.5%) endorsed having headaches; of these, 59.6% (3183/5337) screened positive on the ID Migraine screen. The participants who screened positive for migraine reported 0.66 missed workdays and 3.77 days with productivity reduced by at least 50% due to migraine in the past 3 months, leading to an estimated lost productive time (LPT) of 10.12 days annually per employee with migraine. Participants reported associating the word \"migraine\" most closely with headache or pain (4182/5754; 72.7%). Only about half of participants answered the knowledge question correctly (2819/5751; 49.0%). Of the 5771 survey participants, 992 (17.2%) were interested in receiving headache care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Migraine significantly impacts workplace productivity at a large healthcare system, particularly presenteeism. Migraine tends to be perceived as a headache and about half of the participants did not answer the knowledge question correctly. This survey study supports a need for a workplace migraine education and management program for healthcare workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"1634-1640"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.15053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: (1) To estimate the impact of migraine on work productivity among employees at a large healthcare system in the United States. (2) To assess the knowledge and perception of migraine among employees and to evaluate the number of employees interested in receiving migraine care to help plan a future workplace migraine education and management program.

Background: Despite advances in treatment, migraine is underdiagnosed and undertreated and remains a leading cause of disability in the world. Workplace migraine education and/or management programs have been shown to improve migraine-related productivity. However, there has not yet been a published organization-wide workplace migraine education and management program in the United States.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional, online survey of employees at a large healthcare system in the Northeast region of the United States that was open from November 1, 2024, to January 3, 2025. Survey questions queried employment status (one question), knowledge and perceptions of migraine (two questions), headache and migraine screen (four questions), productivity impact (two questions), and potential interest in receiving care for headaches (one question).

Results: Out of 33,761 employees, 20,000 were reached via internal communication, 6583 (32.9%) agreed to participate, and 5771 (28.9%) completed the survey. The majority of employees who chose to complete the survey (5337/5771; 92.5%) endorsed having headaches; of these, 59.6% (3183/5337) screened positive on the ID Migraine screen. The participants who screened positive for migraine reported 0.66 missed workdays and 3.77 days with productivity reduced by at least 50% due to migraine in the past 3 months, leading to an estimated lost productive time (LPT) of 10.12 days annually per employee with migraine. Participants reported associating the word "migraine" most closely with headache or pain (4182/5754; 72.7%). Only about half of participants answered the knowledge question correctly (2819/5751; 49.0%). Of the 5771 survey participants, 992 (17.2%) were interested in receiving headache care.

Conclusion: Migraine significantly impacts workplace productivity at a large healthcare system, particularly presenteeism. Migraine tends to be perceived as a headache and about half of the participants did not answer the knowledge question correctly. This survey study supports a need for a workplace migraine education and management program for healthcare workers.

工作场所偏头痛:使用横断面员工调查的大型美国医疗保健系统对工作效率的影响。
目的:(1)评估偏头痛对美国大型医疗保健系统员工工作效率的影响。(2)评估员工对偏头痛的认知和感知,并评估有兴趣接受偏头痛护理的员工数量,以帮助制定未来的工作场所偏头痛教育和管理计划。背景:尽管治疗取得了进展,但偏头痛仍未得到充分诊断和治疗,并且仍然是世界上致残的主要原因。工作场所偏头痛教育和/或管理计划已被证明可以提高偏头痛相关的生产力。然而,在美国还没有一个出版的组织范围的工作场所偏头痛教育和管理计划。方法:对2024年11月1日至2025年1月3日开放的美国东北地区一家大型医疗保健系统的员工进行横断面在线调查。调查问题包括就业状况(1个问题),对偏头痛的认识和认知(2个问题),头痛和偏头痛筛查(4个问题),生产力影响(2个问题),以及接受头痛治疗的潜在兴趣(1个问题)。结果:在33,761名员工中,通过内部沟通达到20,000人,6583人(32.9%)同意参与,5771人(28.9%)完成了调查。选择完成调查的大多数员工(5337/5771;92.5%)承认头痛;其中,59.6%(3183/5337)在ID偏头痛筛查中呈阳性。偏头痛筛查呈阳性的参与者报告说,在过去的3个月里,有0.66天没有工作,3.77天的生产力因偏头痛而降低了至少50%,导致每位偏头痛员工每年损失10.12天的生产时间(LPT)。参与者报告将“偏头痛”一词与头痛或疼痛联系最紧密(4182/5754;72.7%)。只有大约一半的参与者正确回答了知识问题(2819/5751;49.0%)。在5771名调查参与者中,992名(17.2%)对接受头痛治疗感兴趣。结论:偏头痛显著影响大型医疗保健系统的工作效率,尤其是出勤率。偏头痛往往被认为是一种头痛,大约一半的参与者没有正确回答知识问题。这项调查研究支持了医疗工作者对工作场所偏头痛教育和管理计划的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信