Does the existing evidence on flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath indicate a potential paradigm shift in the management of kidney and ureteral stones with flexible ureteroscopy? An overview from EAU endourology.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Vineet Gauhar, Daniele Castellani, Arman Tsaturyan, Kazumi Taguchi, Thomas Herrmann, Bhaskar Somani, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen
{"title":"Does the existing evidence on flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath indicate a potential paradigm shift in the management of kidney and ureteral stones with flexible ureteroscopy? An overview from EAU endourology.","authors":"Vineet Gauhar, Daniele Castellani, Arman Tsaturyan, Kazumi Taguchi, Thomas Herrmann, Bhaskar Somani, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This opinion article from the EAU Endourology Section critically summarizes the existing evidence on flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS) to determine if they represent a paradigm shift in managing kidney and ureteral stones with flexible ureteroscopy (FURS). This scoping review aims to synthesize recent findings on FANS efficacy, safety, and potential to overcome limitations of conventional ureteral access sheath (C-UAS) and other modalities.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Current evidence demonstrates FANS significantly outperforms C-UAS. Key findings include substantially higher immediate and 30-day stone-free rates (SFR), including achievable zero-fragment status, even for stones >2 cm, multiple stones, lower pole stones, and in paediatric patients. FANS reduces infectious complications (e.g., postoperative fever and sepsis), improves intrarenal pressure control, minimizes radiation exposure risk, and shortens operative times. Studies show noninferiority to mini-PCNL for 2-3 cm stones, with advantages like better quality of life and reduced bleeding. FANS enables same-session bilateral procedures and may reduce the need for postoperative stenting. Surgeons report high satisfaction due to improved visualization, suction efficiency, and navigation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The collective evidence from this review positions FANS as a transformative technology enabling a paradigm shift in FURS for both adults and children. By enhancing stone clearance, visualization, and efficiency while reducing infectious complications through superior IRP control and expanding applicability to complex cases, FANS overcomes key limitations of conventional approaches. As the technology evolves, FANS is established as essential for achieving optimal SFR in FURS, fundamentally changing urolithiasis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This opinion article from the EAU Endourology Section critically summarizes the existing evidence on flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS) to determine if they represent a paradigm shift in managing kidney and ureteral stones with flexible ureteroscopy (FURS). This scoping review aims to synthesize recent findings on FANS efficacy, safety, and potential to overcome limitations of conventional ureteral access sheath (C-UAS) and other modalities.

Recent findings: Current evidence demonstrates FANS significantly outperforms C-UAS. Key findings include substantially higher immediate and 30-day stone-free rates (SFR), including achievable zero-fragment status, even for stones >2 cm, multiple stones, lower pole stones, and in paediatric patients. FANS reduces infectious complications (e.g., postoperative fever and sepsis), improves intrarenal pressure control, minimizes radiation exposure risk, and shortens operative times. Studies show noninferiority to mini-PCNL for 2-3 cm stones, with advantages like better quality of life and reduced bleeding. FANS enables same-session bilateral procedures and may reduce the need for postoperative stenting. Surgeons report high satisfaction due to improved visualization, suction efficiency, and navigation.

Summary: The collective evidence from this review positions FANS as a transformative technology enabling a paradigm shift in FURS for both adults and children. By enhancing stone clearance, visualization, and efficiency while reducing infectious complications through superior IRP control and expanding applicability to complex cases, FANS overcomes key limitations of conventional approaches. As the technology evolves, FANS is established as essential for achieving optimal SFR in FURS, fundamentally changing urolithiasis management.

现有的关于柔性和可导航的输尿管吸入鞘的证据是否表明柔性输尿管镜治疗肾脏和输尿管结石的潜在模式转变?EAU内分泌学综述。
回顾的目的:这篇来自EAU输尿管科的观点文章批判性地总结了关于柔性和可导航的吸引输尿管通路鞘(FANS)的现有证据,以确定它们是否代表了柔性输尿管镜(FURS)治疗肾脏和输尿管结石的范式转变。本综述旨在综合FANS的有效性、安全性以及克服常规输尿管导管鞘(C-UAS)和其他方式局限性的潜力的最新研究结果。最新发现:目前的证据表明,FANS的性能明显优于C-UAS。主要发现包括显著提高的即刻和30天无结石率(SFR),包括可实现的零碎片状态,即使对于直径为2厘米的结石、多发结石、下极结石和儿科患者也是如此。FANS减少了感染并发症(例如,术后发热和败血症),改善了肾内压控制,最大限度地减少了辐射暴露风险,缩短了手术时间。研究表明,对于2-3厘米结石,mini-PCNL具有非劣效性,其优点是生活质量更好,出血减少。FANS可以同时进行双侧手术,减少术后支架置入术的需要。外科医生报告说,由于提高了视觉效果、吸引效率和导航,他们的满意度很高。总结:来自本综述的集体证据表明,FANS是一种变革性技术,能够使成人和儿童的FURS发生范式转变。通过提高结石清除、可视化和效率,同时通过优越的IRP控制和扩大对复杂病例的适用性减少感染并发症,FANS克服了传统方法的主要局限性。随着技术的发展,FANS被认为是实现FURS中最佳SFR的关键,从根本上改变了尿石症的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
Current Opinion in Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信