Integrating Environmental Costs Into Power Plant Bidding: A Pathway to Sustainable Energy Transition

IF 3.6 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Arif S. Malik
{"title":"Integrating Environmental Costs Into Power Plant Bidding: A Pathway to Sustainable Energy Transition","authors":"Arif S. Malik","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3605576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current structures of the electricity market are criticized in this article for failing to internalize the external costs of carbon emissions from thermal power plants. It highlights the shortcomings of the two main policy instruments—carbon taxes and carbon trading. While carbon taxes are frequently too low to bring about meaningful change, particularly in capital-intensive industries like power generation, emissions trading schemes set overall caps but do not encourage reductions beyond the targets. By recalculating marginal costs using heat rates and input-output curves, the author suggests bridging this gap by incorporating environmental costs into power plant bidding prices. This method changes dispatch priorities according to actual societal costs and openly accounts for externalities as shown using data from the U.S. Department of Energy on five fossil fuel generation technologies. Moreover, screening curve analysis is carried out to show the overall economics of these technologies when the carbon costs are added. Using IEEE-118 fossil fuel data, the study shows more than <inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>20/MWh cost gap between the average and marginal costs for some plants when CO2 is priced at <inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>50/ton. It calls for policies mandating emission disclosure and integrating environmental costs into decisions to penalize polluters and drive a lasting shift toward cleaner energy and climate alignment.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"154803-154811"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11148237","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11148237/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current structures of the electricity market are criticized in this article for failing to internalize the external costs of carbon emissions from thermal power plants. It highlights the shortcomings of the two main policy instruments—carbon taxes and carbon trading. While carbon taxes are frequently too low to bring about meaningful change, particularly in capital-intensive industries like power generation, emissions trading schemes set overall caps but do not encourage reductions beyond the targets. By recalculating marginal costs using heat rates and input-output curves, the author suggests bridging this gap by incorporating environmental costs into power plant bidding prices. This method changes dispatch priorities according to actual societal costs and openly accounts for externalities as shown using data from the U.S. Department of Energy on five fossil fuel generation technologies. Moreover, screening curve analysis is carried out to show the overall economics of these technologies when the carbon costs are added. Using IEEE-118 fossil fuel data, the study shows more than ${\$}$ 20/MWh cost gap between the average and marginal costs for some plants when CO2 is priced at ${\$}$ 50/ton. It calls for policies mandating emission disclosure and integrating environmental costs into decisions to penalize polluters and drive a lasting shift toward cleaner energy and climate alignment.
将环境成本纳入电厂招标:可持续能源转型之路
本文批评当前的电力市场结构未能内部化火电厂碳排放的外部成本。它突出了两种主要政策工具——碳税和碳交易的缺点。虽然碳税往往过低,无法带来有意义的变化,尤其是在发电等资本密集型行业,但排放交易计划设定了总体上限,但不鼓励超出目标的减排。通过使用热率和投入产出曲线重新计算边际成本,作者建议通过将环境成本纳入发电厂竞标价格来弥合这一差距。该方法根据实际社会成本改变调度优先级,并公开考虑外部性,如美国能源部关于五种化石燃料发电技术的数据所示。此外,还进行了筛选曲线分析,以显示在增加碳成本时这些技术的整体经济性。使用IEEE-118化石燃料数据,该研究显示,当二氧化碳定价为50美元/吨时,一些工厂的平均成本和边际成本之间的成本差距超过20美元/兆瓦时。报告呼吁制定政策,要求披露排放信息,并将环境成本纳入惩罚污染者的决策中,推动向清洁能源和气候协调的持久转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Access
IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信