{"title":"Integrating Environmental Costs Into Power Plant Bidding: A Pathway to Sustainable Energy Transition","authors":"Arif S. Malik","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3605576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current structures of the electricity market are criticized in this article for failing to internalize the external costs of carbon emissions from thermal power plants. It highlights the shortcomings of the two main policy instruments—carbon taxes and carbon trading. While carbon taxes are frequently too low to bring about meaningful change, particularly in capital-intensive industries like power generation, emissions trading schemes set overall caps but do not encourage reductions beyond the targets. By recalculating marginal costs using heat rates and input-output curves, the author suggests bridging this gap by incorporating environmental costs into power plant bidding prices. This method changes dispatch priorities according to actual societal costs and openly accounts for externalities as shown using data from the U.S. Department of Energy on five fossil fuel generation technologies. Moreover, screening curve analysis is carried out to show the overall economics of these technologies when the carbon costs are added. Using IEEE-118 fossil fuel data, the study shows more than <inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>20/MWh cost gap between the average and marginal costs for some plants when CO2 is priced at <inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>50/ton. It calls for policies mandating emission disclosure and integrating environmental costs into decisions to penalize polluters and drive a lasting shift toward cleaner energy and climate alignment.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"154803-154811"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11148237","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11148237/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current structures of the electricity market are criticized in this article for failing to internalize the external costs of carbon emissions from thermal power plants. It highlights the shortcomings of the two main policy instruments—carbon taxes and carbon trading. While carbon taxes are frequently too low to bring about meaningful change, particularly in capital-intensive industries like power generation, emissions trading schemes set overall caps but do not encourage reductions beyond the targets. By recalculating marginal costs using heat rates and input-output curves, the author suggests bridging this gap by incorporating environmental costs into power plant bidding prices. This method changes dispatch priorities according to actual societal costs and openly accounts for externalities as shown using data from the U.S. Department of Energy on five fossil fuel generation technologies. Moreover, screening curve analysis is carried out to show the overall economics of these technologies when the carbon costs are added. Using IEEE-118 fossil fuel data, the study shows more than ${\$}$ 20/MWh cost gap between the average and marginal costs for some plants when CO2 is priced at ${\$}$ 50/ton. It calls for policies mandating emission disclosure and integrating environmental costs into decisions to penalize polluters and drive a lasting shift toward cleaner energy and climate alignment.
IEEE AccessCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest.
IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on:
Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals.
Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering.
Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques.
Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.