Interpretable machine learning approach for predicting the workability and mechanical properties of betel nut husk fiber-reinforced concrete

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Mehedi Hasan , Md Soumike Hassan , Kamrul Hasan , Fazlul Hoque Tushar , Majid Khan , Ramadhansyah Putra Jaya
{"title":"Interpretable machine learning approach for predicting the workability and mechanical properties of betel nut husk fiber-reinforced concrete","authors":"Mehedi Hasan ,&nbsp;Md Soumike Hassan ,&nbsp;Kamrul Hasan ,&nbsp;Fazlul Hoque Tushar ,&nbsp;Majid Khan ,&nbsp;Ramadhansyah Putra Jaya","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Natural fiber-reinforced concrete (NFRC) is gaining attention for its sustainability, cost-effectiveness, and biodegradability, making it a promising material for construction and repair. Betel nut husk fiber (BNHF) is being incorporated into concrete due to its eco-friendly, nontoxic, and biodegradable properties. However, traditional methods for measuring slump, compressive strength (CS), and split tensile strength (STS) are often time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly. To address this, machine learning (ML) models offer an efficient alternative for predicting these properties, enabling faster and more economical adjustments to BNHF-reinforced concrete mixes. This study explores the use of five ensemble ML models: Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, CatBoost, AdaBoost, and LightGBM to predict slump, CS, and STS. Model performance was evaluated using five metrics: coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The results showed that the CatBoost model performed best in predicting slump and CS, with R² values of 0.989 and 0.918, and RMSEs of 2.116 mm and 1.986 MPa, respectively. For STS, XGBoost outperformed other models, achieving an R² of 0.862 and an RMSE of 0.406 MPa on the test set. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis indicated that BNHF percentage and fiber content had the greatest influence on slump, while curing time was the most significant factor affecting both CS and STS. The findings demonstrate that CatBoost and XGBoost can accurately predict the mechanical properties, offering a practical alternative to extensive laboratory testing and enabling time and cost savings in construction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 110152"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425019678","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natural fiber-reinforced concrete (NFRC) is gaining attention for its sustainability, cost-effectiveness, and biodegradability, making it a promising material for construction and repair. Betel nut husk fiber (BNHF) is being incorporated into concrete due to its eco-friendly, nontoxic, and biodegradable properties. However, traditional methods for measuring slump, compressive strength (CS), and split tensile strength (STS) are often time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly. To address this, machine learning (ML) models offer an efficient alternative for predicting these properties, enabling faster and more economical adjustments to BNHF-reinforced concrete mixes. This study explores the use of five ensemble ML models: Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, CatBoost, AdaBoost, and LightGBM to predict slump, CS, and STS. Model performance was evaluated using five metrics: coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The results showed that the CatBoost model performed best in predicting slump and CS, with R² values of 0.989 and 0.918, and RMSEs of 2.116 mm and 1.986 MPa, respectively. For STS, XGBoost outperformed other models, achieving an R² of 0.862 and an RMSE of 0.406 MPa on the test set. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis indicated that BNHF percentage and fiber content had the greatest influence on slump, while curing time was the most significant factor affecting both CS and STS. The findings demonstrate that CatBoost and XGBoost can accurately predict the mechanical properties, offering a practical alternative to extensive laboratory testing and enabling time and cost savings in construction.
预测槟榔壳纤维增强混凝土可操作性和力学性能的可解释机器学习方法
天然纤维增强混凝土(NFRC)因其可持续性、成本效益和生物降解性而备受关注,成为一种很有前途的建筑和修复材料。槟榔壳纤维(BNHF)因其环保、无毒和可生物降解的特性而被掺入混凝土中。然而,测量坍落度、抗压强度(CS)和劈裂抗拉强度(STS)的传统方法往往耗时、费力且昂贵。为了解决这个问题,机器学习(ML)模型为预测这些特性提供了一种有效的替代方案,能够更快、更经济地调整bnhf钢筋混凝土混合料。本研究探讨了五种集成ML模型的使用:随机森林(RF)、XGBoost、CatBoost、AdaBoost和LightGBM来预测暴跌、CS和STS。使用五个指标评估模型的性能:决定系数(R²)、均方根误差(RMSE)、标准化均方根误差(NRMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)。结果表明,CatBoost模型对坍落度和CS的预测效果最好,R²值分别为0.989和0.918,rmse分别为2.116 mm和1.986 MPa。对于STS, XGBoost优于其他模型,在测试集上的R²为0.862,RMSE为0.406 MPa。SHapley Additive explanation (SHAP)分析表明,BNHF百分比和纤维含量对坍落度的影响最大,而固化时间是影响CS和STS最显著的因素。研究结果表明,CatBoost和XGBoost可以准确预测机械性能,为大量的实验室测试提供了一种实用的替代方案,并节省了施工时间和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信