The effects of second-order climate beliefs on environmental communication behavior: The mediating role of environmental discussion efficacy

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Zeyu Ji , Yuanchao Gong , Jianchi Tian , Zelin Tong , Xiaoming Tian , Yan Sun
{"title":"The effects of second-order climate beliefs on environmental communication behavior: The mediating role of environmental discussion efficacy","authors":"Zeyu Ji ,&nbsp;Yuanchao Gong ,&nbsp;Jianchi Tian ,&nbsp;Zelin Tong ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Tian ,&nbsp;Yan Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Beliefs about others' beliefs, or \"second-order beliefs\", are gaining incremental attention in understanding the antecedents of pro-environmental behaviors. However, few extant studies have examined their impact on interpersonal environmental communication, an important type of pro-environmental behavior. Using data from two large-sample online surveys (Study 1: young students in Hainan province, China, <em>N</em> = 9,163; Study 2: adult participants across China, <em>N</em> = 890) and one experiment (<em>N</em> = 200, Study 3), we systematically investigated whether and how second-order climate beliefs (i.e., beliefs about other people's beliefs in the fact of climate change) influence individuals' environmental communication behavior. Results across three studies constantly show that second-order climate beliefs are significantly and positively associated with environmental communication behavior, even after controlling for one's own climate beliefs (i.e., first-order climate beliefs). However, second-order beliefs' positive association with environmental discussion efficacy and the mediation effect of environmental discussion efficacy were only detected in the survey data (Study 2), not in the experiment (Study 3). Overall, the current research offers crucial preliminary insights into understanding the positive effect of second-order climate beliefs on environmental communication behavior and the potential psychological mechanism. We thus provide practical suggestions for encouraging public participation in interpersonal environmental communication based on second-order climate beliefs and discussion efficacy, and offer recommendations for future research to expand research methods, population, as well as types of efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102746"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002294","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beliefs about others' beliefs, or "second-order beliefs", are gaining incremental attention in understanding the antecedents of pro-environmental behaviors. However, few extant studies have examined their impact on interpersonal environmental communication, an important type of pro-environmental behavior. Using data from two large-sample online surveys (Study 1: young students in Hainan province, China, N = 9,163; Study 2: adult participants across China, N = 890) and one experiment (N = 200, Study 3), we systematically investigated whether and how second-order climate beliefs (i.e., beliefs about other people's beliefs in the fact of climate change) influence individuals' environmental communication behavior. Results across three studies constantly show that second-order climate beliefs are significantly and positively associated with environmental communication behavior, even after controlling for one's own climate beliefs (i.e., first-order climate beliefs). However, second-order beliefs' positive association with environmental discussion efficacy and the mediation effect of environmental discussion efficacy were only detected in the survey data (Study 2), not in the experiment (Study 3). Overall, the current research offers crucial preliminary insights into understanding the positive effect of second-order climate beliefs on environmental communication behavior and the potential psychological mechanism. We thus provide practical suggestions for encouraging public participation in interpersonal environmental communication based on second-order climate beliefs and discussion efficacy, and offer recommendations for future research to expand research methods, population, as well as types of efficacy.
二阶气候信念对环境沟通行为的影响:环境讨论效能的中介作用
关于他人信念的信念,或“二阶信念”,在理解亲环境行为的前因性方面正在获得越来越多的关注。然而,现有的研究很少考察它们对人际环境沟通的影响,而人际环境沟通是一种重要的亲环境行为。利用两个大样本在线调查(研究1:中国海南省的年轻学生,N = 9163;研究2:中国各地的成人参与者,N = 890)和一个实验(N = 200,研究3)的数据,我们系统地研究了二阶气候信念(即关于他人对气候变化事实的信念)是否以及如何影响个人的环境传播行为。三项研究的结果不断表明,即使在控制了自己的气候信念(即一阶气候信念)之后,二阶气候信念与环境沟通行为也存在显著的正相关。然而,二阶信念与环境讨论效能的正相关以及环境讨论效能的中介作用仅在调查数据(研究2)中被发现,而在实验(研究3)中未被发现。总体而言,本研究为理解二阶气候信念对环境传播行为的积极作用及其潜在的心理机制提供了重要的初步见解。为鼓励公众参与基于二阶气候信念和讨论效能的人际环境沟通提供了切实可行的建议,并为未来的研究提供了扩展研究方法、人群和效能类型的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信