eHealth Literacy Mediating Social Support and Technology Acceptance Among Patients With Chronic Illnesses: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Lian-Shin Shiu,Yu-Shan Huang,Chieh Yu Liu,Yu-Shan Cheng,Yu-Chi Chen
{"title":"eHealth Literacy Mediating Social Support and Technology Acceptance Among Patients With Chronic Illnesses: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Lian-Shin Shiu,Yu-Shan Huang,Chieh Yu Liu,Yu-Shan Cheng,Yu-Chi Chen","doi":"10.1111/jan.70207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nTo examine the relationships among social support, eHealth literacy and eHealth technology acceptance among patients with chronic illnesses, and investigate whether eHealth literacy plays a mediating role.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nA cross-sectional correlational study.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA total of 202 patients with chronic illnesses were recruited from outpatient clinics and communities in Taiwan. Data were collected via structured questionnaires and analysed using SPSS and PROCESS macro with 1000 bootstrap samples.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\neHealth literacy was the strongest predictor of technology acceptance. Although social support was positively associated with eHealth literacy, it did not directly predict technology acceptance after controlling for eHealth literacy, indicating a full mediation effect.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\neHealth literacy is a crucial mechanism through which social support influences health technologies acceptance. Interventions to improve eHealth literacy, particularly those integrated with social support strategies based on different cultural backgrounds, enhance digital engagement among chronic illnesses.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE\r\nHealthcare professionals and policy-makers should design literacy-sensitive interventions that leverage social networks and involve significant others to promote meaningful eHealth engagement in disease management.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\neHealth literacy fully mediates the relationship between social support and eHealth technology acceptance, proving that social support alone does not directly increase adoption without improving eHealth literacy. eHealth literacy is the strongest predictor of eHealth technology acceptance, emphasising its central role in bridging the gap between social support and eHealth engagement.\r\n\r\nREPORTING METHOD\r\nThis study followed the STROBE checklist guideline.\r\n\r\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\r\nNo patient or public involvement.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM To examine the relationships among social support, eHealth literacy and eHealth technology acceptance among patients with chronic illnesses, and investigate whether eHealth literacy plays a mediating role. DESIGN A cross-sectional correlational study. METHODS A total of 202 patients with chronic illnesses were recruited from outpatient clinics and communities in Taiwan. Data were collected via structured questionnaires and analysed using SPSS and PROCESS macro with 1000 bootstrap samples. RESULTS eHealth literacy was the strongest predictor of technology acceptance. Although social support was positively associated with eHealth literacy, it did not directly predict technology acceptance after controlling for eHealth literacy, indicating a full mediation effect. CONCLUSIONS eHealth literacy is a crucial mechanism through which social support influences health technologies acceptance. Interventions to improve eHealth literacy, particularly those integrated with social support strategies based on different cultural backgrounds, enhance digital engagement among chronic illnesses. IMPLICATIONS FOR PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE Healthcare professionals and policy-makers should design literacy-sensitive interventions that leverage social networks and involve significant others to promote meaningful eHealth engagement in disease management. IMPACT eHealth literacy fully mediates the relationship between social support and eHealth technology acceptance, proving that social support alone does not directly increase adoption without improving eHealth literacy. eHealth literacy is the strongest predictor of eHealth technology acceptance, emphasising its central role in bridging the gap between social support and eHealth engagement. REPORTING METHOD This study followed the STROBE checklist guideline. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION No patient or public involvement.
电子健康素养对慢性病患者社会支持和技术接受的影响:一项横断面研究
目的探讨慢性病患者的社会支持、电子健康素养和电子健康技术接受度之间的关系,并探讨电子健康素养是否在其中起中介作用。设计横断面相关研究。方法从台湾门诊和社区招募202例慢性疾病患者。采用结构化问卷收集数据,采用SPSS和PROCESS宏对1000个bootstrap样本进行分析。结果健康素养是技术接受程度的最强预测因子。虽然社会支持与电子健康素养呈正相关,但在控制电子健康素养后,它并不能直接预测技术接受程度,表明存在充分的中介效应。结论健康素养是社会支持影响卫生技术接受度的重要机制。提高电子卫生素养的干预措施,特别是与基于不同文化背景的社会支持战略相结合的干预措施,可加强慢性病患者的数字参与。对专业和/或患者护理的启示医疗保健专业人员和政策制定者应该设计对读写能力敏感的干预措施,利用社会网络并让重要的其他人参与进来,以促进有意义的电子健康参与疾病管理。影响健康素养充分中介社会支持和电子健康技术接受之间的关系,证明如果没有提高电子健康素养,单独的社会支持不会直接增加采用。电子卫生素养是电子卫生技术接受程度的最强预测指标,强调了其在弥合社会支持和电子卫生参与之间差距方面的核心作用。报告方法本研究遵循STROBE检查表指南。患者或公众贡献:无患者或公众参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信