Confinement, Jamming, and Adhesion in Cancer Cells Dissociating from a Collectively Invading Strand.

PRX life Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1103/prxlife.3.013012
Wei Wang, Robert A Law, Emiliano Perez Ipiña, Konstantinos Konstantopoulos, Brian A Camley
{"title":"Confinement, Jamming, and Adhesion in Cancer Cells Dissociating from a Collectively Invading Strand.","authors":"Wei Wang, Robert A Law, Emiliano Perez Ipiña, Konstantinos Konstantopoulos, Brian A Camley","doi":"10.1103/prxlife.3.013012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When cells in a primary tumor work together to invade into nearby tissue, this can lead to cell dissociations-cancer cells breaking off from the invading front-leading to metastasis. What controls the dissociation of cells and whether they break off singly or in small groups? Can this be determined by cell-cell adhesion or chemotactic cues given to cells? We develop a physical model for this question, based on experiments that mimic aspects of cancer cell invasion using microfluidic devices with microchannels of different widths. Experimentally, most dissociation events (\"ruptures\") involve single cells breaking off, but we observe some ruptures of large groups (~20 cells) in wider channels. The rupture probability is nearly independent of channel width. We recapitulate the experimental results with a phase-field cell motility model by introducing three different cell states (follower, guided, and high-motility \"leader\" cells) based on their spatial position. These leader cells may explain why single-cell rupture is the universal most probable outcome. Our simulation results show that cell-channel adhesion is necessary for cells in narrow channels to invade, and strong cell-cell adhesion leads to fewer but larger ruptures. Chemotaxis also influences the rupture behavior: Strong chemotaxis strength leads to larger and faster ruptures. Finally, we study the relationship between biological jamming transitions and cell dissociations. Our results suggest unjamming is necessary but not sufficient to create ruptures.</p>","PeriodicalId":520261,"journal":{"name":"PRX life","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRX life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/prxlife.3.013012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When cells in a primary tumor work together to invade into nearby tissue, this can lead to cell dissociations-cancer cells breaking off from the invading front-leading to metastasis. What controls the dissociation of cells and whether they break off singly or in small groups? Can this be determined by cell-cell adhesion or chemotactic cues given to cells? We develop a physical model for this question, based on experiments that mimic aspects of cancer cell invasion using microfluidic devices with microchannels of different widths. Experimentally, most dissociation events ("ruptures") involve single cells breaking off, but we observe some ruptures of large groups (~20 cells) in wider channels. The rupture probability is nearly independent of channel width. We recapitulate the experimental results with a phase-field cell motility model by introducing three different cell states (follower, guided, and high-motility "leader" cells) based on their spatial position. These leader cells may explain why single-cell rupture is the universal most probable outcome. Our simulation results show that cell-channel adhesion is necessary for cells in narrow channels to invade, and strong cell-cell adhesion leads to fewer but larger ruptures. Chemotaxis also influences the rupture behavior: Strong chemotaxis strength leads to larger and faster ruptures. Finally, we study the relationship between biological jamming transitions and cell dissociations. Our results suggest unjamming is necessary but not sufficient to create ruptures.

癌细胞与集体入侵链分离时的限制、干扰和粘附。
当原发肿瘤中的细胞一起侵入附近的组织时,这可能导致细胞分离——癌细胞从入侵的前线脱落——从而导致转移。是什么控制着细胞的分离,以及它们是单独分离还是成群分离?这可以通过细胞粘附或给予细胞的趋化线索来确定吗?我们针对这个问题开发了一个物理模型,基于使用具有不同宽度微通道的微流体装置模拟癌细胞侵袭的实验。在实验中,大多数解离事件(“破裂”)涉及单个细胞的断裂,但我们观察到一些大群体(约20个细胞)在更宽的通道中破裂。破裂概率几乎与通道宽度无关。我们通过引入三种不同的细胞状态(跟随、引导和高运动性“领导”细胞),基于它们的空间位置,用相场细胞运动模型概括了实验结果。这些领导细胞可以解释为什么单细胞破裂是普遍最可能的结果。我们的模拟结果表明,细胞通道的黏附是狭窄通道中细胞入侵的必要条件,强的细胞-细胞黏附导致更少但更大的破裂。趋化性也影响断裂行为:强的趋化性强度导致更大更快的断裂。最后,我们研究了生物干扰转变与细胞分离之间的关系。我们的结果表明,疏解是必要的,但不足以造成破裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信