Yuval Avidan, Amir Aker, Razi Khoury, Baruch Weizman, Sameer Kassem
{"title":"How often is multifocal atrial tachycardia mistaken for atrial fibrillation in the emergency department?","authors":"Yuval Avidan, Amir Aker, Razi Khoury, Baruch Weizman, Sameer Kassem","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Multifocal atrial tachycardia (MAT), characterized by an irregularly irregular rhythm, is often regarded as a clinical imitator of atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of MAT misclassification as AF in the emergency department (ED) setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 1828 ECGs from patients discharged with AF diagnoses over five years. All tracings were independently reviewed by three blinded cardiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MAT was identified in one case (0.05 %). Other misclassifications included atrial flutter (7.9 %), supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (1.6 %), and sinus rhythm with conduction disturbances, artifacts, or ectopy (1.0 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Misdiagnosis of MAT as AF in the ED is rare. However, other diagnostic errors remain relatively common, underscoring the need for careful rhythm evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94223,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of the medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of the medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2025.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Multifocal atrial tachycardia (MAT), characterized by an irregularly irregular rhythm, is often regarded as a clinical imitator of atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of MAT misclassification as AF in the emergency department (ED) setting.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1828 ECGs from patients discharged with AF diagnoses over five years. All tracings were independently reviewed by three blinded cardiologists.
Results: MAT was identified in one case (0.05 %). Other misclassifications included atrial flutter (7.9 %), supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (1.6 %), and sinus rhythm with conduction disturbances, artifacts, or ectopy (1.0 %).
Conclusions: Misdiagnosis of MAT as AF in the ED is rare. However, other diagnostic errors remain relatively common, underscoring the need for careful rhythm evaluation.