{"title":"A novel dose-based intra-preplan method for high-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer using modeling and optimization algorithms.","authors":"Shinya Komori, Yoshiaki Takagawa, Hiroki Sato, Masanori Machida, Masato Kato, Hisao Ouchi, Hiromitsu Endo, Wataru Itano, Takahiro Kato","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study presents the dose-based intra-preplan (DIP) method for intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (IC/ISBT) in cervical cancer, optimizing catheter configurations based on dose distribution. This study aimed to assess the DIP method's clinical feasibility and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>The DIP method incorporates the implant modeling function and the hybrid inverse planning optimization algorithm in Oncentra Brachy. Virtual applicator and catheter models were created and merged with patient-specific computed tomography images. Subsequently, an optimization algorithm was used to automatically determine the optimal catheter configuration-including the number, positions, and insertion depths. The workflow was retrospectively validated in 14 IC/ISBT patients treated with the Geneva applicators. Catheter configurations from the DIP and conventional intra-preplan (IP) methods were compared in terms of catheter number and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for high-risk clinical target volume (CTV<sub>HR</sub>) and organs at risk (OARs). To evaluate the optimality of the DIP-based configurations, DVH parameters were assessed after changing the number of catheters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DIP workflow was successfully established. Compared to the IP method, the DIP method achieved similar DVH parameters for both CTV<sub>HR</sub> and OARs with significantly fewer catheters (p < 0.01). The addition of catheters did not significantly alter DVH parameters, while their reduction significantly compromised CTV<sub>HR</sub> coverage (p < 0.01) and increased OAR doses (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DIP method enables patient-specific optimization of minimal catheter configurations and supports the broader implementation of high-quality IC/ISBT.</p>","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2025.07.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study presents the dose-based intra-preplan (DIP) method for intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (IC/ISBT) in cervical cancer, optimizing catheter configurations based on dose distribution. This study aimed to assess the DIP method's clinical feasibility and efficacy.
Methods and materials: The DIP method incorporates the implant modeling function and the hybrid inverse planning optimization algorithm in Oncentra Brachy. Virtual applicator and catheter models were created and merged with patient-specific computed tomography images. Subsequently, an optimization algorithm was used to automatically determine the optimal catheter configuration-including the number, positions, and insertion depths. The workflow was retrospectively validated in 14 IC/ISBT patients treated with the Geneva applicators. Catheter configurations from the DIP and conventional intra-preplan (IP) methods were compared in terms of catheter number and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for high-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR) and organs at risk (OARs). To evaluate the optimality of the DIP-based configurations, DVH parameters were assessed after changing the number of catheters.
Results: The DIP workflow was successfully established. Compared to the IP method, the DIP method achieved similar DVH parameters for both CTVHR and OARs with significantly fewer catheters (p < 0.01). The addition of catheters did not significantly alter DVH parameters, while their reduction significantly compromised CTVHR coverage (p < 0.01) and increased OAR doses (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: The DIP method enables patient-specific optimization of minimal catheter configurations and supports the broader implementation of high-quality IC/ISBT.