Patient and Provider Perspectives on Cesarean Delivery Pain and Anesthesia Experiences: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2025-08-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26884844251364123
Yunseo Linda Park, Briana Clifton, Rida Ashraf, Rose Barlow, Alexandra Anderson, Valeria Altamirano, Emily Miller, Mark Neuman, Grace Lim
{"title":"Patient and Provider Perspectives on Cesarean Delivery Pain and Anesthesia Experiences: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Yunseo Linda Park, Briana Clifton, Rida Ashraf, Rose Barlow, Alexandra Anderson, Valeria Altamirano, Emily Miller, Mark Neuman, Grace Lim","doi":"10.1177/26884844251364123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of evidence on the importance of pain or other aspects of clinical care in the overall patient experience and patient-centered outcomes in cesarean delivery. The purpose of this study was to discover patient priorities in cesarean delivery anesthesia experience, to compare patient and provider perspectives, and to explore attitudes on shared decision-making around anesthesia choices for cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with recent cesarean deliveries and clinical care providers were approached using a purposeful sampling strategy for this prospective observational qualitative study. Patients were included if they were in the hospital within 72 hours of a cesarean delivery (scheduled or unscheduled), spoke English fluently, and had term gestation. Providers were included if they currently provide regular clinical care to patients having cesarean deliveries and have at least 3 years of practice experience. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using an interview guide. Interview transcripts were independently coded by three coders and qualitatively analyzed for major themes until thematic saturation was achieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 participants (20 patients and 22 providers) completed interviews. Five major themes emerged reflecting patient attitudes and beliefs toward cesarean delivery experience: (1) effective communication, education, and respect; (2) emotional support by care team; (3) intraoperative pain or discomfort; (4) varying acceptability around pain therapies; and (5) stigma surrounding cesarean delivery. Five major themes emerged reflecting provider attitudes and beliefs toward cesarean delivery priorities: (1) complexity of pain responses; (2) multiple pain control strategies; (3) effective communication during emergency cesarean delivery; (4) patient psychological well-being during cesarean delivery; and (5) barriers to observing the patients' birth plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients and providers alike desire pain management, psychological well-being, and effective communication during cesarean delivery. Patients emphasize relationships and trust in their cesarean experience, while clinicians emphasize clinical complexities and physical treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"6 1","pages":"711-722"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26884844251364123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of evidence on the importance of pain or other aspects of clinical care in the overall patient experience and patient-centered outcomes in cesarean delivery. The purpose of this study was to discover patient priorities in cesarean delivery anesthesia experience, to compare patient and provider perspectives, and to explore attitudes on shared decision-making around anesthesia choices for cesarean delivery.

Methods: Patients with recent cesarean deliveries and clinical care providers were approached using a purposeful sampling strategy for this prospective observational qualitative study. Patients were included if they were in the hospital within 72 hours of a cesarean delivery (scheduled or unscheduled), spoke English fluently, and had term gestation. Providers were included if they currently provide regular clinical care to patients having cesarean deliveries and have at least 3 years of practice experience. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using an interview guide. Interview transcripts were independently coded by three coders and qualitatively analyzed for major themes until thematic saturation was achieved.

Results: A total of 42 participants (20 patients and 22 providers) completed interviews. Five major themes emerged reflecting patient attitudes and beliefs toward cesarean delivery experience: (1) effective communication, education, and respect; (2) emotional support by care team; (3) intraoperative pain or discomfort; (4) varying acceptability around pain therapies; and (5) stigma surrounding cesarean delivery. Five major themes emerged reflecting provider attitudes and beliefs toward cesarean delivery priorities: (1) complexity of pain responses; (2) multiple pain control strategies; (3) effective communication during emergency cesarean delivery; (4) patient psychological well-being during cesarean delivery; and (5) barriers to observing the patients' birth plans.

Conclusion: Patients and providers alike desire pain management, psychological well-being, and effective communication during cesarean delivery. Patients emphasize relationships and trust in their cesarean experience, while clinicians emphasize clinical complexities and physical treatments.

病人和医生对剖宫产疼痛和麻醉经验的看法:一项定性研究。
背景:在剖宫产中,疼痛或临床护理的其他方面在整体患者体验和以患者为中心的结局中的重要性缺乏证据。本研究的目的是发现患者对剖宫产麻醉经验的优先考虑,比较患者和提供者的观点,并探讨剖宫产麻醉选择的共同决策态度。方法:采用有目的的抽样策略,对近期剖宫产患者和临床护理人员进行前瞻性观察性定性研究。如果患者在剖宫产(预定或非预定)后72小时内住院,英语流利,妊娠期足,则纳入研究。如果提供者目前为剖宫产患者提供常规临床护理,并且至少有3年的实践经验,则包括在内。半结构化访谈采用访谈指南进行。访谈记录由三名编码员独立编码,并对主要主题进行定性分析,直到主题饱和。结果:共有42名参与者(20名患者和22名提供者)完成了访谈。五个主要主题反映了患者对剖宫产经验的态度和信念:(1)有效的沟通、教育和尊重;(2)护理团队的情感支持;(3)术中疼痛或不适;(4)疼痛治疗的可接受性不同;(5)围绕剖宫产的污名。五个主要主题反映了提供者对剖宫产优先级的态度和信念:(1)疼痛反应的复杂性;(2)多种疼痛控制策略;(3)急诊剖宫产时的有效沟通;(4)剖宫产患者心理健康状况;(5)观察患者生育计划的障碍。结论:剖宫产过程中,患者和医护人员都渴望疼痛管理、心理健康和有效的沟通。患者在剖宫产过程中强调关系和信任,而临床医生则强调临床复杂性和物理治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信