Technophobia in digital health contexts: A systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on older adults.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-09-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076251374218
Xiaofang Song, Shasha Li, Liying Dong, Yue Li, Xinyu Yang, Jianyi Bao, Shufang Liao, Yingxue Xi, Guojing Guo
{"title":"Technophobia in digital health contexts: A systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on older adults.","authors":"Xiaofang Song, Shasha Li, Liying Dong, Yue Li, Xinyu Yang, Jianyi Bao, Shufang Liao, Yingxue Xi, Guojing Guo","doi":"10.1177/20552076251374218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>With the rapid integration of digital technologies into healthcare, technophobia has become a key barrier to digital health adoption, especially among older adults. This study aimed to evaluate technophobia levels and identify associated factors within a multidimensional ecological framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across 10 electronic databases for studies published until April 30, 2025. Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled effect sizes. Technophobia levels were assessed using mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs), each accompanied by a 95% confidence interval (CI). Summary correlation coefficients (<i>r</i>), with 95% CI, were used to evaluate associated factors based on the health ecological model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies were included. The findings indicate that older adults demonstrated significantly elevated technophobia levels (MD = 39.90, 95% CI: 35.87-43.94) compared to non-older adults, with privacy and security concerns scoring the highest among the three dimensions (MD = 3.29, 95% CI: 2.94-3.64). Additionally, several factors showed significant correlations with technophobia (<i>r</i> = -0.537 to 0.235, <i>P</i> < 0.05), spanning four ecological domains: individual traits (e.g. digital health literacy), behavioral traits (e.g. self-efficacy), interpersonal networks (e.g. social networks), and living environment (e.g. income level).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Technophobia is notably high among older adults in digital health contexts, especially regarding privacy and security concerns. Its roots span individual, social, and systemic dimensions. These findings highlight the need for targeted, multilevel interventions to reduce technophobia and ensure equitable access to digital health technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"11 ","pages":"20552076251374218"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251374218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: With the rapid integration of digital technologies into healthcare, technophobia has become a key barrier to digital health adoption, especially among older adults. This study aimed to evaluate technophobia levels and identify associated factors within a multidimensional ecological framework.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across 10 electronic databases for studies published until April 30, 2025. Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled effect sizes. Technophobia levels were assessed using mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs), each accompanied by a 95% confidence interval (CI). Summary correlation coefficients (r), with 95% CI, were used to evaluate associated factors based on the health ecological model.

Results: Nineteen studies were included. The findings indicate that older adults demonstrated significantly elevated technophobia levels (MD = 39.90, 95% CI: 35.87-43.94) compared to non-older adults, with privacy and security concerns scoring the highest among the three dimensions (MD = 3.29, 95% CI: 2.94-3.64). Additionally, several factors showed significant correlations with technophobia (r = -0.537 to 0.235, P < 0.05), spanning four ecological domains: individual traits (e.g. digital health literacy), behavioral traits (e.g. self-efficacy), interpersonal networks (e.g. social networks), and living environment (e.g. income level).

Conclusions: Technophobia is notably high among older adults in digital health contexts, especially regarding privacy and security concerns. Its roots span individual, social, and systemic dimensions. These findings highlight the need for targeted, multilevel interventions to reduce technophobia and ensure equitable access to digital health technologies.

数字健康背景下的技术恐惧症:以老年人为重点的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:随着数字技术迅速融入医疗保健,技术恐惧症已成为数字健康采用的主要障碍,特别是在老年人中。本研究旨在评估技术恐惧程度,并在多维生态框架内确定相关因素。方法:对截至2025年4月30日发表的10个电子数据库进行系统检索。进行meta分析以估计合并效应大小。使用平均差异(MDs)或标准化平均差异(SMDs)评估技术恐惧水平,每个都伴随着95%的置信区间(CI)。基于健康生态模型,采用综合相关系数(r)和95% CI来评价相关因素。结果:共纳入19项研究。研究结果表明,与非老年人相比,老年人的技术恐惧水平显著升高(MD = 39.90, 95% CI: 35.87-43.94),其中隐私和安全问题得分最高(MD = 3.29, 95% CI: 2.94-3.64)。此外,有几个因素显示出与技术恐惧症显著相关(r = -0.537至0.235)。结论:在数字健康环境中,技术恐惧症在老年人中尤其高,特别是在隐私和安全问题上。它的根源跨越个人、社会和系统层面。这些发现突出表明,需要采取有针对性的多层次干预措施,以减少技术恐惧症,并确保公平获得数字卫生技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信