Improving Intensive Care Unit Nurses' Delirium Assessment Performance Through a Multimodal Educational Intervention.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Rui-Ling Chang, Shu-Fen Siao, Shih-Chi Ku, Yu-Chang Yeh, Yu-Chun Chang, Cheryl Chia-Hui Chen
{"title":"Improving Intensive Care Unit Nurses' Delirium Assessment Performance Through a Multimodal Educational Intervention.","authors":"Rui-Ling Chang, Shu-Fen Siao, Shih-Chi Ku, Yu-Chang Yeh, Yu-Chun Chang, Cheryl Chia-Hui Chen","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is a prevalent and serious ICU complication, particularly in elderly or ventilated patients. Accurate assessment is crucial but often inconsistent. Intensive care unit (ICU) nurses' use of the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) may be limited without structured training.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the delirium assessment performance of ICU nurses using ICDSC and assess the effectiveness of a multimodal educational intervention for performance enhancement.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This pre- and post-intervention study was conducted in three medical ICUs in Northern Taiwan. The delirium assessment performance of ICU nurses using ICDSC was evaluated, followed by a three-month multimodal educational intervention aimed at improving assessment performance. Each nurse's ICDSC assessment was paired with an independent assessment by a trained expert nurse. To ensure representation that reflects the true performance level, accounting for variations in nurses' working shifts, weekday and weekend staff ratios and sampling fairness across the three MICU units, the pairings were made using a three-step randomization process, managed by an independent third party. A 3-month multimodal educational intervention, including didactic lectures, difficult scenario reviews and one-to-one bedside mentoring, was implemented afterward. Inter-rater agreement before and after the intervention was assessed using Cohen's kappa and Gwet's AC1 statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline agreement between ICU nurses and the expert nurse was suboptimal (kappa = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.57-0.70). The multimodal educational intervention was well-received by the units, particularly among new nurses. Following the intervention, kappa significantly improved to 0.74 (95% CI: 0.69-0.80). Notable improvements were observed in key items of ICDSC, including the assessment of altered level of consciousness, inattention, disorientation, psychomotor agitation or retardation, and sleep-wake cycle disturbances. However, agreement remained poor for certain patient populations, especially those aged over 85 years and those subjected to physical restraint.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A structured, multimodal educational intervention significantly improved the delirium assessment performance of ICU nurses using the ICDSC. One-to-one coaching and scenario-based learning were particularly effective in enhancing clinical assessment skills. However, additional strategies may be required to address persistent challenges in assessing very elderly patients and those subjected to physical restraint.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>A structured, multimodal educational intervention can substantially enhance the performance of ICU nurses in delirium screening using the ICDSC. Tailored training strategies may help bridge the knowledge-practice gap, leading to more reliable clinical assessments in critical care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 5","pages":"e70168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delirium is a prevalent and serious ICU complication, particularly in elderly or ventilated patients. Accurate assessment is crucial but often inconsistent. Intensive care unit (ICU) nurses' use of the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) may be limited without structured training.

Aim: To evaluate the delirium assessment performance of ICU nurses using ICDSC and assess the effectiveness of a multimodal educational intervention for performance enhancement.

Study design: This pre- and post-intervention study was conducted in three medical ICUs in Northern Taiwan. The delirium assessment performance of ICU nurses using ICDSC was evaluated, followed by a three-month multimodal educational intervention aimed at improving assessment performance. Each nurse's ICDSC assessment was paired with an independent assessment by a trained expert nurse. To ensure representation that reflects the true performance level, accounting for variations in nurses' working shifts, weekday and weekend staff ratios and sampling fairness across the three MICU units, the pairings were made using a three-step randomization process, managed by an independent third party. A 3-month multimodal educational intervention, including didactic lectures, difficult scenario reviews and one-to-one bedside mentoring, was implemented afterward. Inter-rater agreement before and after the intervention was assessed using Cohen's kappa and Gwet's AC1 statistics.

Results: The baseline agreement between ICU nurses and the expert nurse was suboptimal (kappa = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.57-0.70). The multimodal educational intervention was well-received by the units, particularly among new nurses. Following the intervention, kappa significantly improved to 0.74 (95% CI: 0.69-0.80). Notable improvements were observed in key items of ICDSC, including the assessment of altered level of consciousness, inattention, disorientation, psychomotor agitation or retardation, and sleep-wake cycle disturbances. However, agreement remained poor for certain patient populations, especially those aged over 85 years and those subjected to physical restraint.

Conclusions: A structured, multimodal educational intervention significantly improved the delirium assessment performance of ICU nurses using the ICDSC. One-to-one coaching and scenario-based learning were particularly effective in enhancing clinical assessment skills. However, additional strategies may be required to address persistent challenges in assessing very elderly patients and those subjected to physical restraint.

Relevance to clinical practice: A structured, multimodal educational intervention can substantially enhance the performance of ICU nurses in delirium screening using the ICDSC. Tailored training strategies may help bridge the knowledge-practice gap, leading to more reliable clinical assessments in critical care settings.

通过多模式教育干预提高重症监护室护士谵妄评估绩效。
背景:谵妄是ICU常见且严重的并发症,特别是在老年或通气患者中。准确的评估是至关重要的,但往往不一致。重症监护病房(ICU)护士使用重症监护谵妄筛查清单(ICDSC)可能会受到限制,没有结构化的培训。目的:应用ICDSC评价ICU护士谵妄评估的绩效,并评价多模式教育干预对提高绩效的效果。研究设计:本研究于台湾北部三间重症监护室进行干预前后研究。采用ICDSC对ICU护士谵妄评估绩效进行评估,并进行为期3个月的多模式教育干预,以提高评估绩效。每位护士的ICDSC评估与一名训练有素的专家护士的独立评估相匹配。为了确保代表反映真实的绩效水平,考虑到护士轮班、工作日和周末员工比例的变化以及三个MICU单位的抽样公平性,配对采用由独立第三方管理的三步随机化过程。随后实施了为期3个月的多模式教育干预,包括教学讲座、困难情景回顾和一对一床边辅导。采用Cohen's kappa和Gwet's AC1统计数据评估干预前后的评分者间一致性。结果:ICU护士与专家护士的基线一致性不理想(kappa = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.57 ~ 0.70)。多模式教育干预得到了各单位的好评,特别是在新护士中。干预后,kappa显著改善至0.74 (95% CI: 0.69-0.80)。在ICDSC的关键项目中观察到显著的改善,包括意识水平改变、注意力不集中、定向障碍、精神运动性躁动或发育迟缓以及睡眠-觉醒周期障碍的评估。然而,对于某些患者群体,特别是那些年龄超过85岁和身体受到限制的患者,协议仍然很差。结论:结构化、多模式的教育干预显著提高了ICU护士使用ICDSC评估谵妄的表现。一对一指导和基于场景的学习在提高临床评估技能方面特别有效。然而,可能需要额外的策略来解决评估高龄患者和那些受到身体约束的患者的持续挑战。与临床实践的相关性:一个结构化的、多模式的教育干预可以大大提高ICU护士在使用ICDSC进行谵妄筛查中的表现。量身定制的培训策略可能有助于弥合知识与实践之间的差距,从而在重症监护环境中进行更可靠的临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信