A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Test the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability of iPREPARED; A Mobile Health Technology for Patients and Care Partners.
Ivan N Ayala, Hannah Friesen, Fernanda Bellolio, Zayn Boustani, Sandeep Pagali, Stephanie Chambers, Paul Musey, Malaz Boustani, Heidi Lindroth
{"title":"A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Test the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability of iPREPARED; A Mobile Health Technology for Patients and Care Partners.","authors":"Ivan N Ayala, Hannah Friesen, Fernanda Bellolio, Zayn Boustani, Sandeep Pagali, Stephanie Chambers, Paul Musey, Malaz Boustani, Heidi Lindroth","doi":"10.56392/001c.127872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family participation in the delivery of nonpharmacological measures has shown in past studies to prevent 17-75% of incident delirium. A scalable and sustainable method to partner with family (i.e., care partners) and support their delivery of nonpharmacologic measures is needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To test the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of iPREPARED in a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT). iPREPARED is a mobile health technology co-designed with patients and care partners containing resources on nonpharmacological interventions to prevent delirium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospitalized adults (≥65 years) with ≥1 delirium risk factor and a care partner (family or friend ≥18yo) willing to participate were enrolled. The primary outcomes were feasibility, acceptability, and usability. Descriptive statistics are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 23 dyads completed the study (median age 72 years (IQR 64, 79), 60% male, and 100% Caucasian). Dyads reported that iPREPARED was acceptable, with moderate usability. Recruitment in the emergency department was feasible whereas recruitment once hospitalized and admitted was more difficult.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study design was feasible. iPREPARED was acceptable and usable as an intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":72776,"journal":{"name":"Delirium communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delirium communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56392/001c.127872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Family participation in the delivery of nonpharmacological measures has shown in past studies to prevent 17-75% of incident delirium. A scalable and sustainable method to partner with family (i.e., care partners) and support their delivery of nonpharmacologic measures is needed.
Objectives: To test the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of iPREPARED in a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT). iPREPARED is a mobile health technology co-designed with patients and care partners containing resources on nonpharmacological interventions to prevent delirium.
Methods: Hospitalized adults (≥65 years) with ≥1 delirium risk factor and a care partner (family or friend ≥18yo) willing to participate were enrolled. The primary outcomes were feasibility, acceptability, and usability. Descriptive statistics are reported.
Results: In total, 23 dyads completed the study (median age 72 years (IQR 64, 79), 60% male, and 100% Caucasian). Dyads reported that iPREPARED was acceptable, with moderate usability. Recruitment in the emergency department was feasible whereas recruitment once hospitalized and admitted was more difficult.
Conclusion: The study design was feasible. iPREPARED was acceptable and usable as an intervention.