Patient and Physician Perspectives on Cardiovascular Risk: A Multicenter Survey of Communication Gaps Among Hospitalized Patients in Spain.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Juan Górriz-Magaña, Ramon Maruri-Sánchez, Ane Elorriaga, Nahikari Salterain-González, Alicia Prieto-Lobato, Raúl Gascueña Rubia, Isabel Monedero Sánchez, Ana Elvira-Laffond, Miguel Lapena Reguero, Amanda Leandro Barros, Cristina Villabona Rivas, Alejandro Gutiérrez-Fernández, César Jiménez-Méndez, Silvia Prieto-González, María Melendo-Viu, Blanca Alcón Durán, Emilio Blanco López, Clara Bonanad Lozano, Alejandro Durante-López, Anna Carrasquer, Pedro Martínez-Losas, Teresa Alvarado Casas, Pedro Pájaro Merino, Victor Juárez-Olmos, Javier Lopez-Pais, Michelle M Kittleson, Pablo Díez-Villanueva, Jordi Bañeras
{"title":"Patient and Physician Perspectives on Cardiovascular Risk: A Multicenter Survey of Communication Gaps Among Hospitalized Patients in Spain.","authors":"Juan Górriz-Magaña, Ramon Maruri-Sánchez, Ane Elorriaga, Nahikari Salterain-González, Alicia Prieto-Lobato, Raúl Gascueña Rubia, Isabel Monedero Sánchez, Ana Elvira-Laffond, Miguel Lapena Reguero, Amanda Leandro Barros, Cristina Villabona Rivas, Alejandro Gutiérrez-Fernández, César Jiménez-Méndez, Silvia Prieto-González, María Melendo-Viu, Blanca Alcón Durán, Emilio Blanco López, Clara Bonanad Lozano, Alejandro Durante-López, Anna Carrasquer, Pedro Martínez-Losas, Teresa Alvarado Casas, Pedro Pájaro Merino, Victor Juárez-Olmos, Javier Lopez-Pais, Michelle M Kittleson, Pablo Díez-Villanueva, Jordi Bañeras","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective risk communication is essential in managing cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of global mortality. Clear communication between patients and physicians supports informed decision-making, yet comprehension gaps persist. We aimed to assess the quality of risk communication during hospital admissions for cardiovascular events, from patient and physician perspectives, and identify discrepancies in risk perception and associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The HARIPA study (Heart Risk Perception and Communication Inpatient) by the Spanish Society of Cardiology was a multicenter, cross-sectional analysis conducted in 28 hospitals across Spain from October 2022 to March 2023. It included consecutive cardiology inpatients (urgent or scheduled), aged ≥18 years, who could complete structured questionnaires. Participating physicians also completed parallel questionnaires. These assessed admission diagnosis, perceptions of future cardiovascular risk, and communication about potential procedural complications. Agreement between responses was evaluated using kappa indices (weighted for ordinal variables), and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the impact of demographic and clinical factors (odds ratios with 95% CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 943 patients (mean age, 68.2 years; 29.4% women). The most frequent reason for admission was ischemic heart disease (41.3%). Responses resulted in a substantial agreement, with a kappa index of 0.72. Concordance between patients and physicians regarding future cardiovascular risk was low (weighted kappa: 0.29), with patients often underestimating their risk. And for assessment about procedural potential complications was moderate (kappa: 0.34). Although 76.9% of patients reported feeling adequately informed about procedural risks, 69.3% of those who experienced complications (n=208) stated they had not been warned about them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals significant gaps in risk communication in cardiovascular care, particularly regarding future risks and complications. As well-informed patients are more likely to adhere to preventive therapies, tailoring communication strategies to individual patient characteristics could improve understanding and align perceptions with clinical realities, enhancing health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"e011837"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective risk communication is essential in managing cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of global mortality. Clear communication between patients and physicians supports informed decision-making, yet comprehension gaps persist. We aimed to assess the quality of risk communication during hospital admissions for cardiovascular events, from patient and physician perspectives, and identify discrepancies in risk perception and associated factors.

Methods: The HARIPA study (Heart Risk Perception and Communication Inpatient) by the Spanish Society of Cardiology was a multicenter, cross-sectional analysis conducted in 28 hospitals across Spain from October 2022 to March 2023. It included consecutive cardiology inpatients (urgent or scheduled), aged ≥18 years, who could complete structured questionnaires. Participating physicians also completed parallel questionnaires. These assessed admission diagnosis, perceptions of future cardiovascular risk, and communication about potential procedural complications. Agreement between responses was evaluated using kappa indices (weighted for ordinal variables), and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the impact of demographic and clinical factors (odds ratios with 95% CIs).

Results: We included 943 patients (mean age, 68.2 years; 29.4% women). The most frequent reason for admission was ischemic heart disease (41.3%). Responses resulted in a substantial agreement, with a kappa index of 0.72. Concordance between patients and physicians regarding future cardiovascular risk was low (weighted kappa: 0.29), with patients often underestimating their risk. And for assessment about procedural potential complications was moderate (kappa: 0.34). Although 76.9% of patients reported feeling adequately informed about procedural risks, 69.3% of those who experienced complications (n=208) stated they had not been warned about them.

Conclusions: This study reveals significant gaps in risk communication in cardiovascular care, particularly regarding future risks and complications. As well-informed patients are more likely to adhere to preventive therapies, tailoring communication strategies to individual patient characteristics could improve understanding and align perceptions with clinical realities, enhancing health outcomes.

患者和医生对心血管风险的看法:西班牙住院患者沟通差距的多中心调查
背景:有效的风险沟通对于管理心血管疾病至关重要,心血管疾病是全球死亡的主要原因。患者和医生之间的清晰沟通有助于做出明智的决策,但理解差距仍然存在。我们旨在从患者和医生的角度评估心血管事件住院期间风险沟通的质量,并确定风险认知和相关因素的差异。方法:西班牙心脏病学会的HARIPA研究(住院患者心脏风险感知和沟通)是一项多中心,横断面分析,于2022年10月至2023年3月在西班牙28家医院进行。它包括连续的心脏病住院患者(紧急或预定),年龄≥18岁,可以完成结构化问卷。参与调查的医生还完成了平行问卷。这些评估了入院诊断、对未来心血管风险的认知以及对潜在手术并发症的沟通。使用kappa指数(对有序变量进行加权)评估应答之间的一致性,并使用多变量逻辑回归来检查人口统计学和临床因素的影响(95% ci的优势比)。结果:纳入943例患者(平均年龄68.2岁,女性29.4%)。入院最常见的原因是缺血性心脏病(41.3%)。回应结果是一个实质性的协议,kappa指数为0.72。患者和医生关于未来心血管风险的一致性较低(加权kappa: 0.29),患者经常低估他们的风险。对手术潜在并发症的评价kappa为中等(0.34)。尽管76.9%的患者报告说他们对手术风险有充分的了解,但69.3%的出现并发症的患者(n=208)表示他们没有被警告过。结论:这项研究揭示了心血管护理中风险沟通的显著差距,特别是关于未来风险和并发症。由于消息灵通的患者更有可能坚持预防性治疗,因此根据患者个体特征量身定制沟通策略可以增进理解,并使认知与临床现实保持一致,从而提高健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信