The Impact of Medical Cannabis Laws on Cannabis and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment and Overdose-Related Health Care Utilization Among Adults With Chronic Noncancer Pain.
Emma E McGinty, Pradyhumna Wagle, Christie Lee Luo, Nicholas J Seewald, Elizabeth A Stuart, Kayla N Tormohlen
{"title":"The Impact of Medical Cannabis Laws on Cannabis and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment and Overdose-Related Health Care Utilization Among Adults With Chronic Noncancer Pain.","authors":"Emma E McGinty, Pradyhumna Wagle, Christie Lee Luo, Nicholas J Seewald, Elizabeth A Stuart, Kayla N Tormohlen","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policy Points Among patients with chronic noncancer pain, state medical cannabis laws did not impact health care use for opioid use disorder. There were no changes in health care use for opioid overdose attributable to medical cannabis laws. Medical cannabis laws do not appear to lead to reductions in adverse opioid-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Context: </strong>State medical cannabis laws, currently in place in 39 states and Washington, DC, provide an avenue for therapeutic use of cannabis to manage chronic noncancer pain stemming from conditions such as arthritis and low back pain. These laws may also influence cannabis and opioid addiction and overdose, for example, if people substitute cannabis in place of opioids to manage pain. No studies, to our knowledge, have examined how state medical cannabis laws influence health care use related to addiction to or overdose from cannabis or opioids among people with chronic noncancer pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a difference-in-differences design and augmented synthetic control analyses comparing changes in cannabis use disorder (CUD) and opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment and cannabis and opioid overdose-related health care use before and after medical cannabis law implementation among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic noncancer pain in seven states (Florida, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania) relative to changes in outcomes over the same period in 17 comparison states (Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Carolina, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming) without medical cannabis laws.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>State medical cannabis laws had an estimated average effect of less than 0.005 percentage points on the overall proportion of patients receiving any CUD or OUD treatment, less than 0.009 percentage points on the proportion of patients newly initiating CUD or OUD treatment, and less than 0.0005 percentage points on the proportion of patients receiving overdose-related health care for cannabis or opioid overdoses (p > 0.05 for all findings).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study did not identify effects of state medical cannabis laws on health care use related to CUD or OUD treatment or overdose among Medicare beneficiaries younger than age 65 years with chronic noncancer pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":49810,"journal":{"name":"Milbank Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milbank Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.70052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Policy Points Among patients with chronic noncancer pain, state medical cannabis laws did not impact health care use for opioid use disorder. There were no changes in health care use for opioid overdose attributable to medical cannabis laws. Medical cannabis laws do not appear to lead to reductions in adverse opioid-related outcomes.
Context: State medical cannabis laws, currently in place in 39 states and Washington, DC, provide an avenue for therapeutic use of cannabis to manage chronic noncancer pain stemming from conditions such as arthritis and low back pain. These laws may also influence cannabis and opioid addiction and overdose, for example, if people substitute cannabis in place of opioids to manage pain. No studies, to our knowledge, have examined how state medical cannabis laws influence health care use related to addiction to or overdose from cannabis or opioids among people with chronic noncancer pain.
Methods: We used a difference-in-differences design and augmented synthetic control analyses comparing changes in cannabis use disorder (CUD) and opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment and cannabis and opioid overdose-related health care use before and after medical cannabis law implementation among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic noncancer pain in seven states (Florida, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania) relative to changes in outcomes over the same period in 17 comparison states (Alabama, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Carolina, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming) without medical cannabis laws.
Findings: State medical cannabis laws had an estimated average effect of less than 0.005 percentage points on the overall proportion of patients receiving any CUD or OUD treatment, less than 0.009 percentage points on the proportion of patients newly initiating CUD or OUD treatment, and less than 0.0005 percentage points on the proportion of patients receiving overdose-related health care for cannabis or opioid overdoses (p > 0.05 for all findings).
Conclusions: Our study did not identify effects of state medical cannabis laws on health care use related to CUD or OUD treatment or overdose among Medicare beneficiaries younger than age 65 years with chronic noncancer pain.
期刊介绍：
The Milbank Quarterly is devoted to scholarly analysis of significant issues in health and health care policy. It presents original research, policy analysis, and commentary from academics, clinicians, and policymakers. The in-depth, multidisciplinary approach of the journal permits contributors to explore fully the social origins of health in our society and to examine in detail the implications of different health policies. Topics addressed in The Milbank Quarterly include the impact of social factors on health, prevention, allocation of health care resources, legal and ethical issues in health policy, health and health care administration, and the organization and financing of health care.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
