Are bio-based resins suitable alternatives for additively manufactured removable dies? An in vitro study on dimensional and positional trueness and stability.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mustafa Borga Dönmez, Clara Lisa Soliva, Hanan Al-Johani, Ahmet Orgev, Martin Schimmel, Gülce Çakmak, Burak Yilmaz
{"title":"Are bio-based resins suitable alternatives for additively manufactured removable dies? An in vitro study on dimensional and positional trueness and stability.","authors":"Mustafa Borga Dönmez, Clara Lisa Soliva, Hanan Al-Johani, Ahmet Orgev, Martin Schimmel, Gülce Çakmak, Burak Yilmaz","doi":"10.1111/jopr.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the dimensional and positional deviations of additively manufactured removable dies fabricated using two bio-based resins and one conventional dental cast resin, while also evaluating these outcomes over a 4-week period.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A right mandibular first molar preparation on a typodont was scanned to digitally design removable dies and hollow partial arch casts. Based on a priori power analysis, a total of 30 dies (n = 10) and three hollow casts (n = 1) were fabricated using additive manufacturing (AM) from three different dental cast resins: DentaMODEL (DM), FotoDent bio-based model (CB), and soy-based resin (SB). The dies and their seated positions in casts were digitized 1 day (T0), 1 week (T1), 2 weeks (T2), 3 weeks (T3), and 4 weeks (T4) after fabrication. Dies' dimensional deviations (crown, root, base of the root, and overall) and positional deviations in casts (crown region surface and point-based) at T0 were defined as trueness, while deviations measured over 4 weeks (T0-T4) were defined as stability. The deviations measured at T0 were analyzed either using a generalized linear model (dimensional deviations) or one-way analysis of variance (crown region and point-based deviations). The deviations measured over the 4-week period were analyzed with generalized linear model analysis and Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CB dies mostly had the lowest and SB dies mostly had the highest dimensional deviations (p ≤ 0.001). The crown region had the lowest dimensional deviations, while the dimensional deviations measured at T3 were higher than those at T2 and T4 (p ≤ 0.003). SB dies had the highest and CB dies had the lowest positional deviations, while crown region deviations were lower at T0 and T1 than at T4, and point-based deviations were lower at T0 than at T4 (p ≤ 0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CB dies mostly had better dimensional and positional trueness and stability over 4 weeks. The changes in tested outcomes for all dies over time were small.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.70027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the dimensional and positional deviations of additively manufactured removable dies fabricated using two bio-based resins and one conventional dental cast resin, while also evaluating these outcomes over a 4-week period.

Materials and methods: A right mandibular first molar preparation on a typodont was scanned to digitally design removable dies and hollow partial arch casts. Based on a priori power analysis, a total of 30 dies (n = 10) and three hollow casts (n = 1) were fabricated using additive manufacturing (AM) from three different dental cast resins: DentaMODEL (DM), FotoDent bio-based model (CB), and soy-based resin (SB). The dies and their seated positions in casts were digitized 1 day (T0), 1 week (T1), 2 weeks (T2), 3 weeks (T3), and 4 weeks (T4) after fabrication. Dies' dimensional deviations (crown, root, base of the root, and overall) and positional deviations in casts (crown region surface and point-based) at T0 were defined as trueness, while deviations measured over 4 weeks (T0-T4) were defined as stability. The deviations measured at T0 were analyzed either using a generalized linear model (dimensional deviations) or one-way analysis of variance (crown region and point-based deviations). The deviations measured over the 4-week period were analyzed with generalized linear model analysis and Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests (α = 0.05).

Results: CB dies mostly had the lowest and SB dies mostly had the highest dimensional deviations (p ≤ 0.001). The crown region had the lowest dimensional deviations, while the dimensional deviations measured at T3 were higher than those at T2 and T4 (p ≤ 0.003). SB dies had the highest and CB dies had the lowest positional deviations, while crown region deviations were lower at T0 and T1 than at T4, and point-based deviations were lower at T0 than at T4 (p ≤ 0.049).

Conclusions: CB dies mostly had better dimensional and positional trueness and stability over 4 weeks. The changes in tested outcomes for all dies over time were small.

生物基树脂是否适合替代增材制造的可拆卸模具?尺寸和位置真实性及稳定性的体外研究。
目的:本研究旨在比较使用两种生物基树脂和一种传统牙科铸造树脂制造的增材制造可移动模具的尺寸和位置偏差,并在4周的时间内评估这些结果。材料和方法:通过扫描右下颌第一磨牙,数字化设计可移动模具和空心部分弓模。基于先验功率分析,采用增材制造(AM)技术,采用DentaMODEL (DM)、FotoDent生物基模型(CB)和大豆基树脂(SB)三种不同的牙科铸造树脂,共制造了30个模具(n = 10)和3个空心铸件(n = 1)。模具及其在铸件中的位置在制造后1天(T0)、1周(T1)、2周(T2)、3周(T3)和4周(T4)进行数字化。T0时模具的尺寸偏差(牙冠、牙根、牙根底和整体)和铸件的位置偏差(牙冠区域表面和点基)定义为正确度,4周(T0- t4)测量的偏差定义为稳定性。使用广义线性模型(维度偏差)或单向方差分析(冠区和基于点的偏差)对T0测量的偏差进行分析。采用广义线性模型分析和经bonferroni校正的事后检验对4周内测量的偏差进行分析(α = 0.05)。结果:CB型模具尺寸偏差最小,SB型模具尺寸偏差最大(p≤0.001)。冠区尺寸偏差最小,T3测量的尺寸偏差高于T2和T4 (p≤0.003)。SB型模具位置偏差最高,CB型模具位置偏差最低,T0和T1时冠区偏差低于T4, T0时点位偏差低于T4 (p≤0.049)。结论:CB模具在4周内尺寸和位置的准确性和稳定性较好。随着时间的推移,所有死亡的测试结果变化很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信