Exploring the structure of the school curriculum with graph neural networks.

IF 2.3 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS
Journal of Computational Social Science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1007/s42001-025-00420-9
Benjamín Garzón, Vincenzo Perri, Lisi Qarkaxhija, Ingo Scholtes, Martin J Tomasik
{"title":"Exploring the structure of the school curriculum with graph neural networks.","authors":"Benjamín Garzón, Vincenzo Perri, Lisi Qarkaxhija, Ingo Scholtes, Martin J Tomasik","doi":"10.1007/s42001-025-00420-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>School curricula guide the daily learning activities of millions of students. They embody the understanding of the education experts who designed them of how to organize the knowledge that students should acquire in a way that is optimal for learning. This can be viewed as a learning 'theory' which is, nevertheless, rarely put to the test. Here, we model a data set obtained from a Computer-Based Formative Assessment system used by thousands of students. The student-item response matrix is highly sparse and admits a natural representation as a bipartite graph, in which nodes stand for students or items and an edge between a student and an item represents a response of the student to that item. To predict unobserved edge labels (correct/incorrect responses) we resort to a graph neural network (GNN), a machine learning method for graph-structured data. Nodes and edges are represented as multidimensional embeddings. After fitting the model, the learned item embeddings reflect properties of the curriculum, such as item difficulty and the structure of school subject domains and competences. Simulations show that the GNN is particularly advantageous over a classical model when group patterns are present in the connections between students and items, such that students from a particular group have a higher probability of successfully answering items from a specific set. In sum, important aspects of the structure of the school curriculum are reflected in response patterns from educational assessments and can be partially retrieved by our graph-based neural model.</p>","PeriodicalId":29946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Social Science","volume":"8 4","pages":"99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-025-00420-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

School curricula guide the daily learning activities of millions of students. They embody the understanding of the education experts who designed them of how to organize the knowledge that students should acquire in a way that is optimal for learning. This can be viewed as a learning 'theory' which is, nevertheless, rarely put to the test. Here, we model a data set obtained from a Computer-Based Formative Assessment system used by thousands of students. The student-item response matrix is highly sparse and admits a natural representation as a bipartite graph, in which nodes stand for students or items and an edge between a student and an item represents a response of the student to that item. To predict unobserved edge labels (correct/incorrect responses) we resort to a graph neural network (GNN), a machine learning method for graph-structured data. Nodes and edges are represented as multidimensional embeddings. After fitting the model, the learned item embeddings reflect properties of the curriculum, such as item difficulty and the structure of school subject domains and competences. Simulations show that the GNN is particularly advantageous over a classical model when group patterns are present in the connections between students and items, such that students from a particular group have a higher probability of successfully answering items from a specific set. In sum, important aspects of the structure of the school curriculum are reflected in response patterns from educational assessments and can be partially retrieved by our graph-based neural model.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用图神经网络探索学校课程结构。
学校课程指导着数百万学生的日常学习活动。它们体现了设计它们的教育专家的理解,即如何以最优的方式组织学生应该获得的知识。这可以被看作是一种学习的“理论”,然而,很少被付诸实践。在这里,我们对一个数据集进行建模,该数据集来自一个由数千名学生使用的基于计算机的形成性评估系统。学生-项目响应矩阵是高度稀疏的,可以自然地表示为二部图,其中节点代表学生或项目,学生和项目之间的边代表学生对该项目的响应。为了预测未观察到的边缘标签(正确/不正确的响应),我们采用了图神经网络(GNN),这是一种用于图结构数据的机器学习方法。节点和边被表示为多维嵌入。拟合模型后,学习到的项目嵌入反映了课程的属性,如项目难度、学校学科领域和能力的结构。模拟表明,当学生和项目之间的联系存在群体模式时,GNN比经典模型特别有优势,这样来自特定群体的学生有更高的概率成功回答特定集合中的项目。总之,学校课程结构的重要方面反映在教育评估的反应模式中,并且可以通过我们基于图的神经模型部分检索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computational Social Science
Journal of Computational Social Science SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信