Association between Meniscal Injuries at the Time of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lower Return-to-Sport Rates: An Analysis at 5 Years of Follow-up of the MERIscience Cohort.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671251358394
Clément Cazemajou, Thibault Marty-Diloy, Nicolas Graveleau, Pierre Laboudie, Nicolas Bouguennec
{"title":"Association between Meniscal Injuries at the Time of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lower Return-to-Sport Rates: An Analysis at 5 Years of Follow-up of the MERIscience Cohort.","authors":"Clément Cazemajou, Thibault Marty-Diloy, Nicolas Graveleau, Pierre Laboudie, Nicolas Bouguennec","doi":"10.1177/23259671251358394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While meniscal tears, particularly when treated by meniscectomy concurrent with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), are known to increase the risk of osteoarthritis and lead to poorer outcomes, their effects on return to sport (RTS) have been little studied so far.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the effect of meniscal tears on RTS in the context of ACLR depending on the affected meniscus.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a retrospective analysis based on data from a prospective cohort single-center study involving 504 patients who received the same postoperative follow-up for a minimum of 3 years between April 2015 and December 2019. The preinjury Tegner Activity Scale score was collected preoperatively, and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) score was collected 6 months after surgery. At the last follow-up, information such as RTS levels, return to the same sport and same athletic level, Self Knee Value, International Knee Documentation Committee score, ACL-RSI score, Tegner score, graft failure, contralateral rupture, and reintervention was collected. Isolated ACLR was compared with ACLR involving medial meniscus (MM), lateral meniscus (LM), and bi-menisci (BM) injuries, and then meniscal repair and meniscectomies were compared for MM and LM injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 504 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 4.9 ± 1.2 years; 6 patients were lost to follow-up. The mean postoperative Tegner score was significatively lower for ACLR with MM injuries than for isolated ACLR (5.4 ± 2.0 vs 6.0 ± 2.0; <i>P</i> = .01). Compared with isolated ACLR (93.9%), the RTS rate was significantly lower for MM injuries (85.1%) and BM injuries (84.1%) (<i>P</i> = .02). Outcomes were similar in ACLR with LM and in isolated ACLR. MM repairs significantly increased the mean Tegner score compared with MM meniscectomies (5.8 ± 1.9 vs 4.7 ± 2.1; <i>P</i> < .001). No other significant differences were found on RTS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MM tears encountered at the time of ACLR led to a lower Tegner score and a lower RTS rate. Patients undergoing MM repair had higher postoperative activity levels than those undergoing meniscectomy. These findings highlight the importance of repairing MM tears whenever possible at the time of ACLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 9","pages":"23259671251358394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251358394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While meniscal tears, particularly when treated by meniscectomy concurrent with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), are known to increase the risk of osteoarthritis and lead to poorer outcomes, their effects on return to sport (RTS) have been little studied so far.

Purpose: To assess the effect of meniscal tears on RTS in the context of ACLR depending on the affected meniscus.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis based on data from a prospective cohort single-center study involving 504 patients who received the same postoperative follow-up for a minimum of 3 years between April 2015 and December 2019. The preinjury Tegner Activity Scale score was collected preoperatively, and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) score was collected 6 months after surgery. At the last follow-up, information such as RTS levels, return to the same sport and same athletic level, Self Knee Value, International Knee Documentation Committee score, ACL-RSI score, Tegner score, graft failure, contralateral rupture, and reintervention was collected. Isolated ACLR was compared with ACLR involving medial meniscus (MM), lateral meniscus (LM), and bi-menisci (BM) injuries, and then meniscal repair and meniscectomies were compared for MM and LM injuries.

Results: A total of 504 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 4.9 ± 1.2 years; 6 patients were lost to follow-up. The mean postoperative Tegner score was significatively lower for ACLR with MM injuries than for isolated ACLR (5.4 ± 2.0 vs 6.0 ± 2.0; P = .01). Compared with isolated ACLR (93.9%), the RTS rate was significantly lower for MM injuries (85.1%) and BM injuries (84.1%) (P = .02). Outcomes were similar in ACLR with LM and in isolated ACLR. MM repairs significantly increased the mean Tegner score compared with MM meniscectomies (5.8 ± 1.9 vs 4.7 ± 2.1; P < .001). No other significant differences were found on RTS.

Conclusion: MM tears encountered at the time of ACLR led to a lower Tegner score and a lower RTS rate. Patients undergoing MM repair had higher postoperative activity levels than those undergoing meniscectomy. These findings highlight the importance of repairing MM tears whenever possible at the time of ACLR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

前交叉韧带重建时半月板损伤与较低的运动恢复率之间的关系:MERIscience队列5年随访分析
背景:虽然半月板撕裂,特别是在半月板切除术同时进行前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)治疗时,已知会增加骨关节炎的风险并导致较差的结果,但迄今为止对其对重返运动(RTS)的影响研究甚少。目的:根据受影响的半月板评估ACLR中半月板撕裂对RTS的影响。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:作者基于一项前瞻性队列单中心研究的数据进行回顾性分析,该研究涉及504例患者,这些患者在2015年4月至2019年12月期间接受了至少3年的相同术后随访。术前收集损伤前Tegner活动量表评分,术后6个月收集前十字韧带-损伤后运动恢复(ACL-RSI)评分。在最后一次随访时,收集诸如RTS水平、恢复同一运动和相同运动水平、自我膝关节值、国际膝关节文献委员会评分、ACL-RSI评分、Tegner评分、移植物失败、对侧破裂和再干预等信息。将孤立ACLR与累及内侧半月板(MM)、外侧半月板(LM)和双半月板(BM)损伤的ACLR进行比较,然后比较MM和LM损伤的半月板修复和半月板切除术。结果:共纳入504例患者,平均随访时间4.9±1.2年;6例患者失访。MM损伤ACLR术后平均Tegner评分显著低于单独ACLR(5.4±2.0 vs 6.0±2.0;P = 0.01)。与孤立ACLR(93.9%)相比,MM损伤(85.1%)和BM损伤(84.1%)的RTS率显著降低(P = 0.02)。合并LM的ACLR和孤立ACLR的结果相似。MM半月板切除术与MM半月板切除术相比,MM修复显著提高了Tegner平均评分(5.8±1.9 vs 4.7±2.1;P < 0.001)。在RTS游戏中没有发现其他显著差异。结论:ACLR时MM撕裂导致较低的Tegner评分和较低的RTS率。MM修复术患者术后活动水平高于半月板切除术患者。这些发现强调了在ACLR时尽可能修复MM撕裂的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信