Electronic Data Capture of Patient-Report Questionnaire in Patient Management in a Rural Population.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Hayley Harman, Ashleigh A Pona, Lawrence Tabone, Salim Abunnaja, Nova Szoka, Stephanie Cox
{"title":"Electronic Data Capture of Patient-Report Questionnaire in Patient Management in a Rural Population.","authors":"Hayley Harman, Ashleigh A Pona, Lawrence Tabone, Salim Abunnaja, Nova Szoka, Stephanie Cox","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Electronic data capture may enhance efficiency and patient engagement in preoperative psychosocial evaluations for metabolic and bariatric surgery yet concerns persist about its feasibility in rural populations with historically lower mobile health adoption. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of electronic patient-reported outcomes among metabolic and bariatric surgery patients in a rural setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this quality improvement project, 202 patients undergoing presurgical psychosocial evaluation at an academic medical center in rural West Virginia completed a battery of psychological assessments on a clinic-provided tablet. Patients also completed a 9-item questionnaire assessing satisfaction, usability, and perceived impact on provider communication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients reported high satisfaction with the tablet-based format (85%), and nearly all (96%) preferred it over paper-and-pencil forms. Usability ratings were strong, with the majority describing the tablet as \"very easy\" to read (86%), use (84%), and navigate (87%). Notably, 42% reported the tablet encouraged them to discuss eating or mental health concerns with their provider, and 49% indicated it helped them remember prior symptoms. Only 4% preferred paper-and-pencil assessments, and these patients were significantly older.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tablet-based electronic patient-reported outcomes collection is a feasible and well-accepted method for presurgical psychosocial evaluations in rural metabolic and bariatric surgery patients. These findings challenge assumptions about digital hesitancy in rural populations and support broader implementation of electronic data capture in bariatric care workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2025.00068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Electronic data capture may enhance efficiency and patient engagement in preoperative psychosocial evaluations for metabolic and bariatric surgery yet concerns persist about its feasibility in rural populations with historically lower mobile health adoption. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of electronic patient-reported outcomes among metabolic and bariatric surgery patients in a rural setting.

Methods: In this quality improvement project, 202 patients undergoing presurgical psychosocial evaluation at an academic medical center in rural West Virginia completed a battery of psychological assessments on a clinic-provided tablet. Patients also completed a 9-item questionnaire assessing satisfaction, usability, and perceived impact on provider communication.

Results: Most patients reported high satisfaction with the tablet-based format (85%), and nearly all (96%) preferred it over paper-and-pencil forms. Usability ratings were strong, with the majority describing the tablet as "very easy" to read (86%), use (84%), and navigate (87%). Notably, 42% reported the tablet encouraged them to discuss eating or mental health concerns with their provider, and 49% indicated it helped them remember prior symptoms. Only 4% preferred paper-and-pencil assessments, and these patients were significantly older.

Conclusion: Tablet-based electronic patient-reported outcomes collection is a feasible and well-accepted method for presurgical psychosocial evaluations in rural metabolic and bariatric surgery patients. These findings challenge assumptions about digital hesitancy in rural populations and support broader implementation of electronic data capture in bariatric care workflows.

农村患者管理中患者报告问卷的电子数据采集。
背景和目的:电子数据采集可以提高代谢和减肥手术术前社会心理评估的效率和患者参与度,但其在农村人口中的可行性仍然令人担忧,这些人口的流动医疗采用率历来较低。本研究评估了农村地区代谢和减肥手术患者电子报告结果的可行性和可接受性。方法:在这个质量改善项目中,202名在西弗吉尼亚州农村的学术医疗中心接受术前心理社会评估的患者在诊所提供的片剂上完成了一系列心理评估。患者还完成了一份9项问卷,评估满意度、可用性和对提供者沟通的感知影响。结果:大多数患者对基于平板电脑的格式(85%)表示高度满意,几乎所有(96%)的患者更喜欢它而不是纸和铅笔形式。用户对这款平板电脑的可用性评价很高,大多数人认为它“非常容易”阅读(86%)、使用(84%)和导航(87%)。值得注意的是,42%的人表示,这种药片鼓励他们与医生讨论饮食或心理健康问题,49%的人表示,它有助于他们记住以前的症状。只有4%的患者更喜欢纸笔评估,而且这些患者明显年龄较大。结论:基于平板电脑的电子患者报告结果收集是一种可行且被广泛接受的方法,用于农村代谢和减肥手术患者的术前社会心理评估。这些发现挑战了关于农村人口数字犹豫不决的假设,并支持在减肥护理工作流程中更广泛地实施电子数据采集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信