Stakeholder Perspectives on Acceptability of Implementing a Child Mental Health Intervention in Child Welfare Services: A Pilot Study.

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
Kerry A Lee, Caterina Pisciotta, Geetha Gopalan
{"title":"Stakeholder Perspectives on Acceptability of Implementing a Child Mental Health Intervention in Child Welfare Services: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Kerry A Lee, Caterina Pisciotta, Geetha Gopalan","doi":"10.1080/15548732.2025.2518370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pilot study sought to examine the acceptability of implementing a modified behavioral parent training program, the 4Rs and 2Ss intervention, within a Child Welfare (CW) placement prevention service. CW staff (<i>n</i>=12; caseplanners (<i>n</i>=6), supervisors (<i>n</i>=4), and administrators (<i>n</i>=2)) and CW-involved families (<i>n</i>=12) completed surveys which were followed by semi-structured interviews and a focus group to explore the acceptability of implementing the modified 4Rs and 2Ss in the CW setting. All quantitative benchmarks for high acceptability were met (i.e., treatment satisfaction; acceptability and appropriateness of the intervention; attitudes towards evidence-based practices [EBP]). CW staff reported acceptability of the program based on the characteristics of the intervention, overall support received, and appropriateness of the intervention, but had mixed perceptions related to the consultation time commitment and the training received, while role conflict posed as a barrier to acceptability. For CW-involved families, acceptability was enhanced by the recruitment and eligibility process, logistical support (e.g., childcare, transportation, meal), group environment, and child and family wellbeing. Caregivers' acceptability was hindered by the lack of separation between parent and children during group sessions, group size and duration, some session activities, and the voluntary versus crises-oriented focus of caregivers' participation in the program.</p>","PeriodicalId":16907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Child Welfare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Child Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2025.2518370","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This pilot study sought to examine the acceptability of implementing a modified behavioral parent training program, the 4Rs and 2Ss intervention, within a Child Welfare (CW) placement prevention service. CW staff (n=12; caseplanners (n=6), supervisors (n=4), and administrators (n=2)) and CW-involved families (n=12) completed surveys which were followed by semi-structured interviews and a focus group to explore the acceptability of implementing the modified 4Rs and 2Ss in the CW setting. All quantitative benchmarks for high acceptability were met (i.e., treatment satisfaction; acceptability and appropriateness of the intervention; attitudes towards evidence-based practices [EBP]). CW staff reported acceptability of the program based on the characteristics of the intervention, overall support received, and appropriateness of the intervention, but had mixed perceptions related to the consultation time commitment and the training received, while role conflict posed as a barrier to acceptability. For CW-involved families, acceptability was enhanced by the recruitment and eligibility process, logistical support (e.g., childcare, transportation, meal), group environment, and child and family wellbeing. Caregivers' acceptability was hindered by the lack of separation between parent and children during group sessions, group size and duration, some session activities, and the voluntary versus crises-oriented focus of caregivers' participation in the program.

利益相关者对在儿童福利服务中实施儿童心理健康干预的可接受性的看法:一项试点研究。
本试点研究旨在检验在儿童福利(CW)安置预防服务中实施改进的行为父母培训计划(4Rs和2Ss干预)的可接受性。工作人员(n=12)、个案策划者(n=6)、主管(n=4)和管理人员(n=2)以及参与家庭(n=12)完成了调查,随后进行了半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论,以探讨在工作环境中实施修改后的4Rs和2Ss的可接受性。所有高可接受性的定量基准均得到满足(即治疗满意度;干预的可接受性和适当性;对循证实践的态度[EBP])。工作人员根据干预的特点、获得的总体支持和干预的适当性报告了该计划的可接受性,但对咨询时间的承诺和接受的培训有不同的看法,而角色冲突构成了可接受性的障碍。招募和资格流程、后勤支持(如儿童保育、交通、膳食)、团体环境以及儿童和家庭福利提高了参与妇女福利家庭的可接受性。照顾者的可接受性受到以下因素的阻碍:在小组会议期间,父母和孩子之间缺乏分离,小组的规模和持续时间,一些会议活动,以及照顾者参与计划的自愿与危机导向的焦点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Decisions made in the practice of child welfare have lifelong effects on children and their entire families which in turn affects every facet of society. To effectively practice in this vital field, social workers, psychologists, counselors, juvenile court judges, attorneys, and other child welfare professionals need to stay informed about the latest findings and important issues in public child welfare. To answer this crucial need, the Journal of Public Child Welfare provides a broad forum for theory-based and applied research in child welfare. Rather than limit itself to primarily private agencies, this essential journal provides the quality research and comprehensive information that child welfare professionals and public agencies need most.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信