Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Bevacizumab Combined with Atezolizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2025-08-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S534271
Shaobo Zhang, Jiabei Wang, Zebin Zhu, Peng Ji, Yanli Wang, Kun Cheng, Björn Nashan, Lianxin Liu, Shugeng Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Bevacizumab Combined with Atezolizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Shaobo Zhang, Jiabei Wang, Zebin Zhu, Peng Ji, Yanli Wang, Kun Cheng, Björn Nashan, Lianxin Liu, Shugeng Zhang","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S534271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different doses of bevacizumab combined with atezolizumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from patients receiving Atezo-Bev therapy at our institution. Patients were stratified into standard-dose (SD) and low-dose (LD) groups based on bevacizumab dosage. Comparative analyses evaluated antitumor efficacy and adverse events (AEs) incidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 63 patients were included (SD group: n=32; LD group: n=31). Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between the groups. Median overall survival (OS) was 22.0 months in the SD group and 19.3 months in the LD group, while median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.0 months and 6.9 months, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in OS or PFS between the two groups (P=0.276 and P=0.297, respectively). However, the incidence of bevacizumab-related AEs was lower in the LD group compared to the SD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to low-dose bevacizumab combined with atezolizumab, the standard-dose regimen did not demonstrate significant superiority in OS or PFS. Additionally, the low-dose combination may lead to fewer AEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"2007-2015"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S534271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different doses of bevacizumab combined with atezolizumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from patients receiving Atezo-Bev therapy at our institution. Patients were stratified into standard-dose (SD) and low-dose (LD) groups based on bevacizumab dosage. Comparative analyses evaluated antitumor efficacy and adverse events (AEs) incidence.

Results: A total of 63 patients were included (SD group: n=32; LD group: n=31). Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences between the groups. Median overall survival (OS) was 22.0 months in the SD group and 19.3 months in the LD group, while median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.0 months and 6.9 months, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in OS or PFS between the two groups (P=0.276 and P=0.297, respectively). However, the incidence of bevacizumab-related AEs was lower in the LD group compared to the SD group.

Conclusion: Compared to low-dose bevacizumab combined with atezolizumab, the standard-dose regimen did not demonstrate significant superiority in OS or PFS. Additionally, the low-dose combination may lead to fewer AEs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不同剂量贝伐单抗联合阿特唑单抗治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性
目的:评价不同剂量贝伐单抗联合阿特唑单抗治疗不可切除肝癌的疗效和安全性。方法:对我院接受Atezo-Bev治疗患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。根据贝伐单抗剂量将患者分为标准剂量组(SD)和低剂量组(LD)。对比分析评估了抗肿瘤疗效和不良事件(ae)发生率。结果:共纳入63例患者,其中SD组32例,LD组31例。基线特征显示两组间无显著差异。SD组和LD组的中位总生存期(OS)分别为22.0个月和19.3个月,而中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为8.0个月和6.9个月。两组患者OS、PFS比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.276、P=0.297)。然而,与SD组相比,LD组贝伐单抗相关ae的发生率较低。结论:与低剂量贝伐单抗联合阿特唑单抗相比,标准剂量方案在OS或PFS方面没有显着优势。此外,低剂量组合可能导致更少的不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信