Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation by Intensivists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ryota Sato, Natsumi Hamahata, Daisuke Hasegawa, Jonathan Paladino, Erick Itoman
{"title":"Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation by Intensivists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ryota Sato, Natsumi Hamahata, Daisuke Hasegawa, Jonathan Paladino, Erick Itoman","doi":"10.1177/08850666251375418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo summarize the currently available evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cannulation performed by intensivists.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies of any design in which patients underwent ECMO cannulation by intensivists. The search was updated on Dec 15, 2024. Two independent authors screened titles and abstracts for general applicability, followed by full-text review to determine whether studies met the following criteria: (1) adult patients and (2) ECMO cannulation performed by intensivists. Two independent authors extracted study characteristics and outcomes of interest. The Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation was used to stabilize variance. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled complication rates.ResultsA total of 209 studies were screened, and 12 retrospective, single-center studies were included. The pooled complication rate of ECMO cannulations performed by intensivists was 2% per cannula and 5% per patient. In the subgroup of VA ECMO cannulations, the complication rate was 9% per patient, whereas for VV ECMO cannulations, it was 4% per patient.ConclusionsECMO cannulation by intensivists appears to be safe and feasible when supported by adequate training, credentialing processes, and backup support from surgeons in the event of complications such as vascular injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666251375418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666251375418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeTo summarize the currently available evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cannulation performed by intensivists.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies of any design in which patients underwent ECMO cannulation by intensivists. The search was updated on Dec 15, 2024. Two independent authors screened titles and abstracts for general applicability, followed by full-text review to determine whether studies met the following criteria: (1) adult patients and (2) ECMO cannulation performed by intensivists. Two independent authors extracted study characteristics and outcomes of interest. The Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation was used to stabilize variance. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled complication rates.ResultsA total of 209 studies were screened, and 12 retrospective, single-center studies were included. The pooled complication rate of ECMO cannulations performed by intensivists was 2% per cannula and 5% per patient. In the subgroup of VA ECMO cannulations, the complication rate was 9% per patient, whereas for VV ECMO cannulations, it was 4% per patient.ConclusionsECMO cannulation by intensivists appears to be safe and feasible when supported by adequate training, credentialing processes, and backup support from surgeons in the event of complications such as vascular injury.

强化医师的体外膜氧合插管:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的总结目前关于强化医师实施体外膜氧合(ECMO)插管的有效性和安全性的证据。方法:我们对MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane中央对照试验登记系统进行了系统检索,以查找任何设计的患者接受强化医师的ECMO插管的研究。搜索结果于2024年12月15日更新。两位独立作者筛选了标题和摘要的一般适用性,然后对全文进行审查,以确定研究是否符合以下标准:(1)成人患者;(2)由强化医师进行ECMO插管。两位独立作者提取了研究特征和感兴趣的结果。采用Freeman-Tukey双反正弦变换稳定方差。采用随机效应模型计算合并并发症发生率。结果共纳入209项研究,其中12项为回顾性单中心研究。强化医师执行ECMO插管的合并并发症发生率为每个插管2%,每个患者5%。在VA ECMO亚组中,并发症发生率为每位患者9%,而VV ECMO亚组为每位患者4%。结论:如果有足够的培训、认证程序和外科医生在发生血管损伤等并发症时的支持,重症医师进行secmo插管是安全可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信