Culinary Medicine Interventions Among Racial and Ethnic Minority and Underrepresented Populations: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.3 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Benjamin Brown, Emmanuel Adediran, Eliza Taylor, Dominik Ose, Kolawole Okuyemi
{"title":"Culinary Medicine Interventions Among Racial and Ethnic Minority and Underrepresented Populations: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Benjamin Brown, Emmanuel Adediran, Eliza Taylor, Dominik Ose, Kolawole Okuyemi","doi":"10.1177/15598276251370976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Racial and ethnic minority populations experience a higher rate of diet-related disparities compared to the general population. Culinary medicine interventions have the potential to help improve health equity among disadvantaged groups. We examined behavioral, anthropometric, and laboratory outcomes of culinary medicine interventions among racial and ethnic minority and underrepresented populations. <b>Methods:</b> All articles on the PubMed database were searched to identify eligible studies with no date limitation. Articles that included a culinary medicine intervention for racial and ethnic minority and underrepresented populations were eligible for inclusion. <b>Results:</b> A total of 25 articles were included. There were 4186 participants with 3268 adult, 857 child, and 2452 female participants. Participants predominantly identified as Black (25.0%), South Asian (21.6%), and Hispanic (33.5%). Studies varied in design, setting, length, and outcomes (e.g., behavior, clinical). Overall, outcomes varied in significance and effect size. Risk of bias was high among studies. <b>Discussion:</b> Culinary medicine interventions appear to be successfully integrated across various settings and among diverse populations with variable effect on behavioral changes and anthropometric measurement changes. <b>Conclusion:</b> Culinary medicine interventions show promise for improving diet-related health equity; however, greater rigor and controlled study designs are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47480,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"15598276251370976"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276251370976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Racial and ethnic minority populations experience a higher rate of diet-related disparities compared to the general population. Culinary medicine interventions have the potential to help improve health equity among disadvantaged groups. We examined behavioral, anthropometric, and laboratory outcomes of culinary medicine interventions among racial and ethnic minority and underrepresented populations. Methods: All articles on the PubMed database were searched to identify eligible studies with no date limitation. Articles that included a culinary medicine intervention for racial and ethnic minority and underrepresented populations were eligible for inclusion. Results: A total of 25 articles were included. There were 4186 participants with 3268 adult, 857 child, and 2452 female participants. Participants predominantly identified as Black (25.0%), South Asian (21.6%), and Hispanic (33.5%). Studies varied in design, setting, length, and outcomes (e.g., behavior, clinical). Overall, outcomes varied in significance and effect size. Risk of bias was high among studies. Discussion: Culinary medicine interventions appear to be successfully integrated across various settings and among diverse populations with variable effect on behavioral changes and anthropometric measurement changes. Conclusion: Culinary medicine interventions show promise for improving diet-related health equity; however, greater rigor and controlled study designs are needed.

烹饪医学干预在种族和少数民族和代表性不足的人群:一个系统的回顾。
与一般人群相比,种族和少数民族人群的饮食相关差异率更高。烹饪医学干预措施有可能帮助改善弱势群体的健康公平。我们在种族和少数民族和代表性不足的人群中检查了烹饪医学干预的行为、人体测量学和实验室结果。方法:检索PubMed数据库中的所有文章,以确定无日期限制的符合条件的研究。包括对种族和少数民族以及代表性不足的人口进行烹饪医学干预的文章有资格纳入。结果:共纳入25篇文献。共有4186名参与者,其中成人3268人,儿童857人,女性2452人。参与者主要是黑人(25.0%)、南亚人(21.6%)和西班牙人(33.5%)。研究在设计、环境、长度和结果(如行为、临床)上各不相同。总体而言,结果在显著性和效应大小上有所不同。这些研究的偏倚风险很高。讨论:烹饪医学干预措施似乎在不同的环境和不同的人群中成功地整合在一起,对行为改变和人体测量变化有不同的影响。结论:烹饪医学干预有望改善与饮食相关的健康公平;然而,需要更严格和控制的研究设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
119
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信