William J Canestaro, Julie A Patterson, Jonathan D Campbell
{"title":"Inflation reduction act impact on pharmaceutical investment: insights from investor interviews.","authors":"William J Canestaro, Julie A Patterson, Jonathan D Campbell","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is limited direct measurement of whether the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is beginning to influence investment strategy and decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a standardized guide, we interviewed life science investors from a range of stages, investment sizes, and fund types to explore how incentives under the IRA have impacted investment decisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 31 active investors. Over 90% had discussed the law within their firm. While 71% reported a lack of firm-wide consensus as to the IRA's precise potential impacts, 87% reported that the IRA was making it more challenging to bring innovative new medicines to market. All but one investor reported they were more likely to consider a larger launch indication for products they invest in, and 77% reported the IRA influenced small molecule investing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early signals of IRA impact on investor strategy include favoring a larger population launch and reduced small molecule investing. Noting stated preference and other study limitations, investors signaled continued interest in certain high Medicare utilization drugs. Buy-side investment impacts remain understudied.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 9","pages":"qxaf156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: There is limited direct measurement of whether the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is beginning to influence investment strategy and decisions.
Methods: Using a standardized guide, we interviewed life science investors from a range of stages, investment sizes, and fund types to explore how incentives under the IRA have impacted investment decisions.
Results: We interviewed 31 active investors. Over 90% had discussed the law within their firm. While 71% reported a lack of firm-wide consensus as to the IRA's precise potential impacts, 87% reported that the IRA was making it more challenging to bring innovative new medicines to market. All but one investor reported they were more likely to consider a larger launch indication for products they invest in, and 77% reported the IRA influenced small molecule investing.
Conclusion: Early signals of IRA impact on investor strategy include favoring a larger population launch and reduced small molecule investing. Noting stated preference and other study limitations, investors signaled continued interest in certain high Medicare utilization drugs. Buy-side investment impacts remain understudied.