A Critical Examination of the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Model: Provider Perceptions and Themes.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tugba Olgac, Emma McCann, Michelle Riske-Morris, David L Hussey
{"title":"A Critical Examination of the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Model: Provider Perceptions and Themes.","authors":"Tugba Olgac, Emma McCann, Michelle Riske-Morris, David L Hussey","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the experiences of providers from two community behavioral health agencies involved in the implementation of Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHCs).</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted as part of a larger evaluation of CCBHC implementation outcomes in two community-based behavioral health agencies. Ninety-one participants, including case managers, counselors, care coordinators, and leadership teams from both agencies, participated in focus group discussions to share their experiences regarding the implementation of the CCBHC model within their organizations.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>Three rounds of focus group discussions were held between 2021 and 2023. A total of 24 focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed by one of the researchers. Qualitative data was analyzed by two researchers using the systematic text condensation method.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Six themes emerged from the focus groups reflecting both positive impacts and implementation challenges. Providers reported the implementation of CCBHCs improved service accessibility and effective care coordination; however, staff noted difficulties connecting clients with essential community resources, including housing and transportation. Both agencies underwent significant organizational transformation, although communication strategies varied by agency size. Finally, providers observed improved communication, client benefits (e.g., reduced hospitalizations), and positive organizational change. Despite these successes, agencies expressed significant concerns about long-term program viability due to reliance on temporary grant funding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CCBHC model of integrated care has expanded significantly in recent years. Most participants reported a positive cultural shift within their agencies following CCBHC implementation. However, limited community resources continue to restrict agencies' ability to address clients' basic needs. Since the CCBHC model was implemented through temporary grant funding, sustainability remains a concern. Both issues underscore the need for policies that increase the availability of community resources and ensure the long-term viability of CCBHCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70041"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the experiences of providers from two community behavioral health agencies involved in the implementation of Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHCs).

Study setting and design: This qualitative study was conducted as part of a larger evaluation of CCBHC implementation outcomes in two community-based behavioral health agencies. Ninety-one participants, including case managers, counselors, care coordinators, and leadership teams from both agencies, participated in focus group discussions to share their experiences regarding the implementation of the CCBHC model within their organizations.

Data sources and analytic sample: Three rounds of focus group discussions were held between 2021 and 2023. A total of 24 focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed by one of the researchers. Qualitative data was analyzed by two researchers using the systematic text condensation method.

Principal findings: Six themes emerged from the focus groups reflecting both positive impacts and implementation challenges. Providers reported the implementation of CCBHCs improved service accessibility and effective care coordination; however, staff noted difficulties connecting clients with essential community resources, including housing and transportation. Both agencies underwent significant organizational transformation, although communication strategies varied by agency size. Finally, providers observed improved communication, client benefits (e.g., reduced hospitalizations), and positive organizational change. Despite these successes, agencies expressed significant concerns about long-term program viability due to reliance on temporary grant funding.

Conclusion: The CCBHC model of integrated care has expanded significantly in recent years. Most participants reported a positive cultural shift within their agencies following CCBHC implementation. However, limited community resources continue to restrict agencies' ability to address clients' basic needs. Since the CCBHC model was implemented through temporary grant funding, sustainability remains a concern. Both issues underscore the need for policies that increase the availability of community resources and ensure the long-term viability of CCBHCs.

认证社区行为健康诊所模式的关键检查:提供者的看法和主题。
目的:探讨两家社区行为健康机构的服务提供者参与实施认证社区行为健康诊所(CCBHCs)的经验。研究设置和设计:本定性研究是对两家社区行为健康机构CCBHC实施结果进行更大评估的一部分。91名参与者,包括来自两个机构的病例管理人员、咨询师、护理协调员和领导团队,参加了焦点小组讨论,分享了他们在组织内实施CCBHC模式的经验。数据来源和分析样本:在2021年至2023年期间举行了三轮焦点小组讨论。一名研究人员对24个焦点小组进行了录音和转录。两位研究者采用系统的文本浓缩方法对定性数据进行分析。主要发现:焦点小组提出了六个主题,反映了积极影响和执行方面的挑战。提供者报告说,CCBHCs的实施改善了服务可及性和有效的护理协调;然而,工作人员指出,很难将客户与基本的社区资源联系起来,包括住房和交通。这两个机构都经历了重大的组织变革,尽管传播策略因机构规模而异。最后,提供者观察到沟通得到改善,客户受益(例如,住院次数减少),以及积极的组织变革。尽管取得了这些成功,但由于依赖临时拨款资金,各机构对项目的长期可行性表示严重担忧。结论:CCBHC的综合护理模式近年来有了明显的扩展。大多数参与者报告说,在实施ccbhch后,其机构内的文化发生了积极的转变。然而,有限的社区资源继续限制了机构解决客户基本需求的能力。由于CCBHC模式是通过临时拨款实施的,可持续性仍然是一个问题。这两个问题都强调需要制定政策,增加社区资源的可用性,并确保社区卫生保健中心的长期生存能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信