A Study of Academics' Perceptions of Ethical Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Scientific Research and Publishing.

IF 1.1
Perihan Elif Ekmekci, Banu Buruk, Başak Akar, Nazife Yasemin Ardıçoğlu Akışın
{"title":"A Study of Academics' Perceptions of Ethical Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Scientific Research and Publishing.","authors":"Perihan Elif Ekmekci, Banu Buruk, Başak Akar, Nazife Yasemin Ardıçoğlu Akışın","doi":"10.1177/15562646251370869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates how scientists, educators, and ethics committee members in Türkiye perceive the opportunities and risks posed by generative AI and the ethical implications for science and education. This study uses a 22-question survey developed by the EOSC-Future and RDA AIDV Working Group. The responses were gathered from 62 universities across 208 universities in Türkiye, with a completion rate of 98.4%. By capturing the diverse perspectives of key academic stakeholders, this study makes three significant contributions to the academic literature: 1) the responsible utilization of technologies such as generative AI depends not only on technological capabilities but also on the ethical conscientiousness of scientists. 2) it is crucial to use generative AI tools with critical human oversight to maintain scientific integrity. 3) Promoting a culture of ethical scholarly practice necessitates the standardization of responsible conduct of research and its integration into the training of scientists.</p>","PeriodicalId":520668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE","volume":" ","pages":"190-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251370869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how scientists, educators, and ethics committee members in Türkiye perceive the opportunities and risks posed by generative AI and the ethical implications for science and education. This study uses a 22-question survey developed by the EOSC-Future and RDA AIDV Working Group. The responses were gathered from 62 universities across 208 universities in Türkiye, with a completion rate of 98.4%. By capturing the diverse perspectives of key academic stakeholders, this study makes three significant contributions to the academic literature: 1) the responsible utilization of technologies such as generative AI depends not only on technological capabilities but also on the ethical conscientiousness of scientists. 2) it is crucial to use generative AI tools with critical human oversight to maintain scientific integrity. 3) Promoting a culture of ethical scholarly practice necessitates the standardization of responsible conduct of research and its integration into the training of scientists.

学者对生成式人工智能对科研和出版的伦理影响的认知研究。
本研究调查了日本的科学家、教育工作者和伦理委员会成员如何看待生成式人工智能带来的机遇和风险,以及对科学和教育的伦理影响。这项研究使用了由EOSC-Future和RDA AIDV工作组开发的22个问题的调查。问卷调查来自日本208所大学的62所大学,完成率为98.4%。通过捕捉关键学术利益相关者的不同观点,本研究对学术文献做出了三个重大贡献:1)对生成式人工智能等技术的负责任利用不仅取决于技术能力,还取决于科学家的道德责任感。2)使用具有关键人类监督的生成式人工智能工具来维护科学完整性至关重要。3)促进道德学术实践的文化需要对负责任的研究行为进行标准化,并将其纳入科学家的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书