Unveiling the Ethics of Chinese Biobank: Insights from Consent Document Analysis.

IF 1.1
Mingtao Huang, Kun Li, Baicheng Yang, Xiaonan Wang, Jichao Wang, Xiaomei Zhai
{"title":"Unveiling the Ethics of Chinese Biobank: Insights from Consent Document Analysis.","authors":"Mingtao Huang, Kun Li, Baicheng Yang, Xiaonan Wang, Jichao Wang, Xiaomei Zhai","doi":"10.1177/15562646251371249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biobanking in China has seen rapid development, placing the country as a key player globally. However, significant ethical challenges arise, particularly around donor autonomy in informed consent for collecting and using biological materials and personal data. This study examines how Chinese biobanks inform donors about their participation and the ethical content of consent documents. Using qualitative content analysis, 12 consent documents from various biobanks were reviewed against six ethical dimensions. Findings revealed significant variability, with only two biobanks providing comprehensive information across all dimensions. While all biobanks employed an opt-in consent model, the scope of future research and data-sharing was often vaguely defined, raising concerns about donor autonomy. Practical recommendations include adopting flexible legal approaches to enhance donor rights, build public trust, and support biobank research. These findings offer actionable insights for policymakers and biobank administrators, emphasizing the need for more standardized and transparent consent practices to advance public health and medical research ethically and sustainably.</p>","PeriodicalId":520668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE","volume":" ","pages":"241-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251371249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biobanking in China has seen rapid development, placing the country as a key player globally. However, significant ethical challenges arise, particularly around donor autonomy in informed consent for collecting and using biological materials and personal data. This study examines how Chinese biobanks inform donors about their participation and the ethical content of consent documents. Using qualitative content analysis, 12 consent documents from various biobanks were reviewed against six ethical dimensions. Findings revealed significant variability, with only two biobanks providing comprehensive information across all dimensions. While all biobanks employed an opt-in consent model, the scope of future research and data-sharing was often vaguely defined, raising concerns about donor autonomy. Practical recommendations include adopting flexible legal approaches to enhance donor rights, build public trust, and support biobank research. These findings offer actionable insights for policymakers and biobank administrators, emphasizing the need for more standardized and transparent consent practices to advance public health and medical research ethically and sustainably.

揭示中国生物样本库的伦理:来自同意文件分析的见解。
中国的生物银行发展迅速,使中国成为全球的重要参与者。然而,出现了重大的伦理挑战,特别是在收集和使用生物材料和个人数据的捐助者知情同意自主权方面。本研究考察了中国的生物银行如何告知捐赠者他们的参与情况以及同意文件的伦理内容。使用定性内容分析,从六个伦理维度审查了来自各个生物库的12份同意文件。研究结果显示了显著的可变性,只有两个生物库提供了所有维度的全面信息。虽然所有的生物银行都采用了自愿加入的同意模式,但未来研究和数据共享的范围往往定义模糊,这引发了对捐赠者自主权的担忧。切实可行的建议包括采用灵活的法律途径来增强捐赠者的权利、建立公众信任和支持生物银行的研究。这些发现为决策者和生物库管理人员提供了可行的见解,强调需要更标准化和透明的同意做法,以合乎道德和可持续地推进公共卫生和医学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书