Max Fisher, Oluwatobi O Onafowokan, Kyriakos Chatzis, Peter Tretiakov, Peter G Passias
{"title":"Understanding Radiographic Parameters in Cervical Deformity.","authors":"Max Fisher, Oluwatobi O Onafowokan, Kyriakos Chatzis, Peter Tretiakov, Peter G Passias","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Narrative review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize current knowledge on radiographic parameters, classification systems, and compensatory mechanisms essential to the diagnosis and surgical planning of cervical spine deformity (CD) correction.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>CD encompasses a heterogeneous set of conditions associated with neurological impairment and impaired health-related quality of life. Surgical outcomes are closely linked to radiographic alignment, yet no framework exists that integrates all relevant metrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review evaluates contemporary literature to outline major cervical and global alignment parameters, classification systems, and compensatory mechanisms relevant to surgical planning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key parameters such as T1S-CL mismatch and cSVA remain essential for assessing sagittal imbalance in CD. However, cervical alignment is often influenced by global compensation, highlighting the need for full-spine evaluation. Classification systems offer structured, outcome-driven frameworks, while morphologic subtypes further guide surgical approach. Despite these tools, revision rates remain relatively high. Emerging metrics, such as upper cervical extension reserve (UER), may offer additional insight into patient-specific alignment capacity, serving as valuable adjuncts to better predict outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optimal surgical planning in CD requires a comprehensive approach that integrates regional and global alignment parameters, individualized modifiers, and morphologic considerations. Incorporating emerging metrics may improve long-term clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001897","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Narrative review.
Objective: To synthesize current knowledge on radiographic parameters, classification systems, and compensatory mechanisms essential to the diagnosis and surgical planning of cervical spine deformity (CD) correction.
Summary of background data: CD encompasses a heterogeneous set of conditions associated with neurological impairment and impaired health-related quality of life. Surgical outcomes are closely linked to radiographic alignment, yet no framework exists that integrates all relevant metrics.
Methods: This review evaluates contemporary literature to outline major cervical and global alignment parameters, classification systems, and compensatory mechanisms relevant to surgical planning.
Results: Key parameters such as T1S-CL mismatch and cSVA remain essential for assessing sagittal imbalance in CD. However, cervical alignment is often influenced by global compensation, highlighting the need for full-spine evaluation. Classification systems offer structured, outcome-driven frameworks, while morphologic subtypes further guide surgical approach. Despite these tools, revision rates remain relatively high. Emerging metrics, such as upper cervical extension reserve (UER), may offer additional insight into patient-specific alignment capacity, serving as valuable adjuncts to better predict outcomes.
Conclusions: Optimal surgical planning in CD requires a comprehensive approach that integrates regional and global alignment parameters, individualized modifiers, and morphologic considerations. Incorporating emerging metrics may improve long-term clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.