Sense-Making Phenomena-Based Planning: Development of Professional Vision on Ambitious Science Teaching

IF 3.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Arzu Tanis Ozcelik, Scott McDonald
{"title":"Sense-Making Phenomena-Based Planning: Development of Professional Vision on Ambitious Science Teaching","authors":"Arzu Tanis Ozcelik,&nbsp;Scott McDonald","doi":"10.1002/sce.21967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the era of the Framework for K-12 Science Education and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), research on preparing preservice science teachers (PSTs) for NGSS-aligned teaching practices is important. In this study, we explored PSTs' sense-making around planning for Ambitious Science Teaching (AST) during their discussions of teaching in a secondary science teaching methods course. Grounded in sociocultural and situated views of learning, we examine how approximation and decomposition of AST practices support PSTs in making sense of lesson planning in developing meaningful learning and teaching environments. We conducted this case study in a secondary science teaching methods course within a teacher education program at a large mid-Atlantic university. The participants included six PSTs and their instructor. We used video recordings of the course and the lesson plans PSTs developed as data sources. Using both inductive and deductive coding, we applied discourse analysis based on interactional sociolinguistics theory and the framework of professional vision to analyze the data. Findings indicate PSTs engaged in sense-making around two key areas of AST planning: defining phenomena and constructing explanations. PSTs made sense of the characteristics of the chosen phenomenon, including its explicitness and its alignment with the storyline of the unit, as well as what counted as an explanation, focusing on two aspects of scientific explanations: gapless explanations and levels of explanations. Based on these findings, we provided implications for teacher educators designing methods courses that focus on ambitious science instruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"109 5","pages":"1384-1405"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sce.21967","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21967","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the era of the Framework for K-12 Science Education and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), research on preparing preservice science teachers (PSTs) for NGSS-aligned teaching practices is important. In this study, we explored PSTs' sense-making around planning for Ambitious Science Teaching (AST) during their discussions of teaching in a secondary science teaching methods course. Grounded in sociocultural and situated views of learning, we examine how approximation and decomposition of AST practices support PSTs in making sense of lesson planning in developing meaningful learning and teaching environments. We conducted this case study in a secondary science teaching methods course within a teacher education program at a large mid-Atlantic university. The participants included six PSTs and their instructor. We used video recordings of the course and the lesson plans PSTs developed as data sources. Using both inductive and deductive coding, we applied discourse analysis based on interactional sociolinguistics theory and the framework of professional vision to analyze the data. Findings indicate PSTs engaged in sense-making around two key areas of AST planning: defining phenomena and constructing explanations. PSTs made sense of the characteristics of the chosen phenomenon, including its explicitness and its alignment with the storyline of the unit, as well as what counted as an explanation, focusing on two aspects of scientific explanations: gapless explanations and levels of explanations. Based on these findings, we provided implications for teacher educators designing methods courses that focus on ambitious science instruction.

Abstract Image

基于意义生成现象的规划:雄心科学教学专业视野的发展
在K-12科学教育框架和下一代科学标准(NGSS)时代,为符合NGSS的教学实践培养职前科学教师(PSTs)的研究非常重要。在本研究中,我们探讨了教师在中学科学教学方法课程的教学讨论中围绕雄心科学教学(AST)计划的意义建构。在社会文化和情境学习观的基础上,我们研究了AST实践的近似和分解如何支持pst在开发有意义的学习和教学环境中理解课程计划。我们在大西洋中部一所大型大学的教师教育项目的中学科学教学方法课程中进行了这个案例研究。参与者包括六名pst和他们的导师。我们使用课程录像和PSTs制定的教案作为数据源。采用归纳编码和演绎编码两种方法,运用基于互动社会语言学理论的语篇分析和专业视野框架对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,pst参与围绕AST规划的两个关键领域的意义构建:定义现象和构建解释。PSTs理解所选现象的特征,包括其明确性和与该单元的故事情节的一致性,以及什么是解释,重点关注科学解释的两个方面:无间隙解释和解释层次。基于这些发现,我们为教师教育工作者提供了设计方法课程的启示,这些课程侧重于雄心勃勃的科学教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信