Francis C. Djoumessi Zamo, Anthony Colliaux, Valérie Blot-Lafond, Ndontchueng Moyo, Christopher F Njeh
{"title":"Enhancing patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT for breast cancer treatment: A machine learning approach for gamma passing rate (GPR) prediction","authors":"Francis C. Djoumessi Zamo, Anthony Colliaux, Valérie Blot-Lafond, Ndontchueng Moyo, Christopher F Njeh","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Modern radiation therapy for breast cancer has significantly advanced with the adoption of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), offering enhanced precision and improved treatment efficiency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To ensure the accuracy and precision of such complex treatments, a robust patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) protocol is essential. This study investigates the potential of machine learning (ML) models to predict gamma passing rates (GPR), a key metric in PSQA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A dataset comprising 863 VMAT plans was used to develop and compare seven ML models: Histogram-based gradient boosting regressor, random forest regressor, extra trees regressor, gradient boosting regressor, linear regression, AdaBoost regressor, and Multi-layer perceptron regressor. These models incorporated anatomical, dosimetric, and plan complexity features.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among the evaluated models, the extra trees regressor (ETR), random forest regressor (RFR), and gradient boosting regressor (GBR) demonstrated the best performance, achieving mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 0.51%, 0.52%, and 0.51%, and mean squared errors (MSEs) of 0.0051%, 0.0051%, and 0.0052%, respectively, on the validation dataset.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights the promise of ML-based approaches in streamlining PSQA processes, thereby supporting the quality assurance of breast cancer treatments using VMAT.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70251","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Modern radiation therapy for breast cancer has significantly advanced with the adoption of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), offering enhanced precision and improved treatment efficiency.
Purpose
To ensure the accuracy and precision of such complex treatments, a robust patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) protocol is essential. This study investigates the potential of machine learning (ML) models to predict gamma passing rates (GPR), a key metric in PSQA.
Methods
A dataset comprising 863 VMAT plans was used to develop and compare seven ML models: Histogram-based gradient boosting regressor, random forest regressor, extra trees regressor, gradient boosting regressor, linear regression, AdaBoost regressor, and Multi-layer perceptron regressor. These models incorporated anatomical, dosimetric, and plan complexity features.
Results
Among the evaluated models, the extra trees regressor (ETR), random forest regressor (RFR), and gradient boosting regressor (GBR) demonstrated the best performance, achieving mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 0.51%, 0.52%, and 0.51%, and mean squared errors (MSEs) of 0.0051%, 0.0051%, and 0.0052%, respectively, on the validation dataset.
Conclusions
This study highlights the promise of ML-based approaches in streamlining PSQA processes, thereby supporting the quality assurance of breast cancer treatments using VMAT.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic