Enhancing patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT for breast cancer treatment: A machine learning approach for gamma passing rate (GPR) prediction

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Francis C. Djoumessi Zamo, Anthony Colliaux, Valérie Blot-Lafond, Ndontchueng Moyo, Christopher F Njeh
{"title":"Enhancing patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT for breast cancer treatment: A machine learning approach for gamma passing rate (GPR) prediction","authors":"Francis C. Djoumessi Zamo,&nbsp;Anthony Colliaux,&nbsp;Valérie Blot-Lafond,&nbsp;Ndontchueng Moyo,&nbsp;Christopher F Njeh","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Modern radiation therapy for breast cancer has significantly advanced with the adoption of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), offering enhanced precision and improved treatment efficiency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To ensure the accuracy and precision of such complex treatments, a robust patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) protocol is essential. This study investigates the potential of machine learning (ML) models to predict gamma passing rates (GPR), a key metric in PSQA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A dataset comprising 863 VMAT plans was used to develop and compare seven ML models: Histogram-based gradient boosting regressor, random forest regressor, extra trees regressor, gradient boosting regressor, linear regression, AdaBoost regressor, and Multi-layer perceptron regressor. These models incorporated anatomical, dosimetric, and plan complexity features.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among the evaluated models, the extra trees regressor (ETR), random forest regressor (RFR), and gradient boosting regressor (GBR) demonstrated the best performance, achieving mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 0.51%, 0.52%, and 0.51%, and mean squared errors (MSEs) of 0.0051%, 0.0051%, and 0.0052%, respectively, on the validation dataset.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights the promise of ML-based approaches in streamlining PSQA processes, thereby supporting the quality assurance of breast cancer treatments using VMAT.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70251","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Modern radiation therapy for breast cancer has significantly advanced with the adoption of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), offering enhanced precision and improved treatment efficiency.

Purpose

To ensure the accuracy and precision of such complex treatments, a robust patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) protocol is essential. This study investigates the potential of machine learning (ML) models to predict gamma passing rates (GPR), a key metric in PSQA.

Methods

A dataset comprising 863 VMAT plans was used to develop and compare seven ML models: Histogram-based gradient boosting regressor, random forest regressor, extra trees regressor, gradient boosting regressor, linear regression, AdaBoost regressor, and Multi-layer perceptron regressor. These models incorporated anatomical, dosimetric, and plan complexity features.

Results

Among the evaluated models, the extra trees regressor (ETR), random forest regressor (RFR), and gradient boosting regressor (GBR) demonstrated the best performance, achieving mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 0.51%, 0.52%, and 0.51%, and mean squared errors (MSEs) of 0.0051%, 0.0051%, and 0.0052%, respectively, on the validation dataset.

Conclusions

This study highlights the promise of ML-based approaches in streamlining PSQA processes, thereby supporting the quality assurance of breast cancer treatments using VMAT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

增强乳腺癌治疗中VMAT的患者特异性质量保证:一种用于伽马通过率(GPR)预测的机器学习方法
随着体积调制弧线治疗(VMAT)的采用,乳腺癌的现代放射治疗取得了显著进展,提高了精度和治疗效率。为了确保这种复杂治疗的准确性和精确性,一个健全的患者特异性质量保证(PSQA)方案是必不可少的。本研究探讨了机器学习(ML)模型预测γ通过率(GPR)的潜力,这是PSQA的一个关键指标。方法利用863个VMAT计划的数据集,建立梯度增强回归、随机森林回归、额外树回归、梯度增强回归、线性回归、AdaBoost回归和多层感知器回归等7种机器学习模型并进行比较。这些模型结合了解剖学、剂量学和平面复杂性特征。结果在评估的模型中,额外树回归量(ETR)、随机森林回归量(RFR)和梯度增强回归量(GBR)表现最好,在验证数据集上的平均绝对误差(MAEs)分别为0.51%、0.52%和0.51%,均方误差(MSEs)分别为0.0051%、0.0051%和0.0052%。本研究强调了基于ml的方法在简化PSQA过程中的前景,从而支持使用VMAT治疗乳腺癌的质量保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信