Young People’s Views of Social Prescribing as an Approach to Improving Mental Health: A Qualitative Study

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Annabelle Olsson, Emily Stapley, Alexander Russell, Daniel Hayes
{"title":"Young People’s Views of Social Prescribing as an Approach to Improving Mental Health: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Annabelle Olsson,&nbsp;Emily Stapley,&nbsp;Alexander Russell,&nbsp;Daniel Hayes","doi":"10.1155/hsc/2969967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Child and adolescent mental health difficulties are increasing in the UK and internationally. Social prescribing (SP), a nonmedical, community-linked approach, has shown promise for improving adult wellbeing, but its use and acceptability among young people (YP) remain under-researched. There is limited evidence regarding YP’s own views on whether SP is a valuable option for supporting youth mental health. This study aimed to explore YP’s views on SP in England. Participants included YP both with and without experience of SP in England, recruited via youth organisations, social media and community contacts. Overall, 10 YP between the ages of 11 and 25 (mean = 19.6) were interviewed. This included five YP who had engaged in SP and five who had not. Data from semistructured interviews were analysed using thematic analysis (TA), identifying 10 themes organised within three main categories. These reflected positive views (e.g., a new social sphere, self-transformation and valuing a nonmedical alternative), negative views (including concerns about SP replacing therapy and experiences of feeling invalidated or dismissed) and moderating factors (such as the influence of social support, shared decision-making, resource availability and differing expectations). Findings from this study have highlighted what YP themselves think of and may want from SP services, including what would make them more or less likely to engage with SP. This study has also highlighted some limits of SP as an approach to tackle mental health inequalities in YP.</p>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/2969967","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/2969967","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Child and adolescent mental health difficulties are increasing in the UK and internationally. Social prescribing (SP), a nonmedical, community-linked approach, has shown promise for improving adult wellbeing, but its use and acceptability among young people (YP) remain under-researched. There is limited evidence regarding YP’s own views on whether SP is a valuable option for supporting youth mental health. This study aimed to explore YP’s views on SP in England. Participants included YP both with and without experience of SP in England, recruited via youth organisations, social media and community contacts. Overall, 10 YP between the ages of 11 and 25 (mean = 19.6) were interviewed. This included five YP who had engaged in SP and five who had not. Data from semistructured interviews were analysed using thematic analysis (TA), identifying 10 themes organised within three main categories. These reflected positive views (e.g., a new social sphere, self-transformation and valuing a nonmedical alternative), negative views (including concerns about SP replacing therapy and experiences of feeling invalidated or dismissed) and moderating factors (such as the influence of social support, shared decision-making, resource availability and differing expectations). Findings from this study have highlighted what YP themselves think of and may want from SP services, including what would make them more or less likely to engage with SP. This study has also highlighted some limits of SP as an approach to tackle mental health inequalities in YP.

Abstract Image

青少年对社会处方作为改善心理健康途径的看法:一项定性研究
儿童和青少年心理健康问题在英国和国际上都在增加。社会处方(SP)是一种非医疗的、与社区相关的方法,已显示出改善成年人福祉的希望,但其在年轻人中的使用和可接受性(YP)仍未得到充分研究。关于青少年心理健康计划是否为支持青少年心理健康的一个有价值的选择,青少年心理健康计划的个人观点证据有限。本研究旨在探讨英国YP对SP的看法。参与者包括在英国有或没有SP经验的青年,通过青年组织、社交媒体和社区联系招募。总体而言,访谈了10名年龄在11至25岁之间的青少年(平均= 19.6)。其中包括5名参与过SP的YP和5名没有参与SP的YP。使用主题分析(TA)分析来自半结构化访谈的数据,确定了分为三个主要类别的10个主题。这些反映了积极的观点(例如,一个新的社会领域,自我转变和重视非医疗替代方案),消极的观点(包括对SP替代治疗的担忧和感觉无效或被忽视的经历)和缓和因素(例如社会支持的影响,共同决策,资源可用性和不同的期望)。本研究的结果强调了青少年自己对青少年心理健康服务的看法和期望,包括什么会使他们更有可能或更不可能与青少年心理健康服务合作。本研究还强调了青少年心理健康服务作为解决青少年心理健康不平等的方法的一些局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信