A Scoping Review of Health-Related Citizen Science Projects Involving Indigenous Peoples in Australia and Internationally

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Josephine Y. Chau, John Hunter, Josephine D. Gwynn, Ms. Putu Novi Arfirsta Dharmayani, Connie Henson, Briellyn Ludlow, John C. Skinner, Kylie Gwynne, Boe Rambaldini
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Health-Related Citizen Science Projects Involving Indigenous Peoples in Australia and Internationally","authors":"Josephine Y. Chau,&nbsp;John Hunter,&nbsp;Josephine D. Gwynn,&nbsp;Ms. Putu Novi Arfirsta Dharmayani,&nbsp;Connie Henson,&nbsp;Briellyn Ludlow,&nbsp;John C. Skinner,&nbsp;Kylie Gwynne,&nbsp;Boe Rambaldini","doi":"10.1002/hpja.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issue Addressed</h3>\n \n <p>Citizen science, an approach to health promotion that involves public participation and collaboration, has been posited as a promising approach to reach diverse or marginalised populations. This scoping review aims to explore the involvement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders and other First Nations and Indigenous peoples internationally in citizen science in health-related studies. While current health promotion in Indigenous communities is already strongly embedded in participatory approaches, we sought to examine whether citizen science methodologies have been used in health promotion and see what it could add.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched three databases for self-identified citizen science studies on health-related topics in the peer-reviewed literature using the term ‘citizen science’ combined with search terms relevant to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders and global Indigenous populations. We recorded data about project characteristics and the citizen science approach used and appraised the cultural engagement quality of studies included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eleven articles were included for full-text review. Included studies focused on a range of health-related topics, including environmental issues, physical health, food security, and youth mental health. Six studies (55%) adopted a co-created citizen science approach in which citizen scientists had input in key project phases and activities as collaborators and partners. The remaining studies took contributory (27%) or collaborative (9%) approaches, while no studies were citizen-led. The cultural engagement quality of included citizen science projects was positive overall, although there were areas for improvement, specifically having clear Indigenous research leadership and governance, and transparent agreements on rights to cultural and intellectual property arising from the research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Citizen science projects focusing on health-related issues among Indigenous peoples and communities are relatively few. The potential of this approach to enrich current community-based participatory or co-design approaches to health promotion among Indigenous communities remains to be determined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> So What?</h3>\n \n <p>Future citizen science projects involving Indigenous people and communities should prioritise and support Indigenous-led citizen science approaches where communities initiate, lead, and govern research processes. Cultural engagement quality could be improved, particularly in relation to having Indigenous-led research governance, and rights of access to and protections of Indigenous intellectual and cultural property.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"36 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue Addressed

Citizen science, an approach to health promotion that involves public participation and collaboration, has been posited as a promising approach to reach diverse or marginalised populations. This scoping review aims to explore the involvement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders and other First Nations and Indigenous peoples internationally in citizen science in health-related studies. While current health promotion in Indigenous communities is already strongly embedded in participatory approaches, we sought to examine whether citizen science methodologies have been used in health promotion and see what it could add.

Methods

We searched three databases for self-identified citizen science studies on health-related topics in the peer-reviewed literature using the term ‘citizen science’ combined with search terms relevant to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders and global Indigenous populations. We recorded data about project characteristics and the citizen science approach used and appraised the cultural engagement quality of studies included.

Results

Eleven articles were included for full-text review. Included studies focused on a range of health-related topics, including environmental issues, physical health, food security, and youth mental health. Six studies (55%) adopted a co-created citizen science approach in which citizen scientists had input in key project phases and activities as collaborators and partners. The remaining studies took contributory (27%) or collaborative (9%) approaches, while no studies were citizen-led. The cultural engagement quality of included citizen science projects was positive overall, although there were areas for improvement, specifically having clear Indigenous research leadership and governance, and transparent agreements on rights to cultural and intellectual property arising from the research.

Conclusion

Citizen science projects focusing on health-related issues among Indigenous peoples and communities are relatively few. The potential of this approach to enrich current community-based participatory or co-design approaches to health promotion among Indigenous communities remains to be determined.

So What?

Future citizen science projects involving Indigenous people and communities should prioritise and support Indigenous-led citizen science approaches where communities initiate, lead, and govern research processes. Cultural engagement quality could be improved, particularly in relation to having Indigenous-led research governance, and rights of access to and protections of Indigenous intellectual and cultural property.

Abstract Image

涉及澳大利亚和国际土著人民的与健康有关的公民科学项目的范围审查
公民科学是一种涉及公众参与和合作的健康促进方法,被认为是一种有希望接触到不同或边缘化人群的方法。这项范围审查的目的是探讨土著和托雷斯海峡岛民以及其他第一民族和土著人民在国际上参与公民科学与健康有关的研究。虽然目前土著社区的健康促进工作已牢固地纳入参与性办法,我们试图检查公民科学方法是否已用于健康促进,并看看它可以添加什么。方法我们搜索了三个数据库,使用“公民科学”一词结合与土著和托雷斯海峡岛民和全球土著相关的搜索词,在同行评议的文献中搜索自我认定的与健康相关主题的公民科学研究人群。我们记录了有关项目特征和所使用的公民科学方法的数据,并评估了所包括研究的文化参与质量。结果11篇文章纳入全文综述。纳入的研究侧重于一系列与健康相关的主题,包括环境问题、身体健康、食品安全和青少年心理健康。六项研究(55%)采用了共同创造的公民科学方法,其中公民科学家作为合作者和伙伴在关键的项目阶段和活动中投入。其余的研究采用贡献(27%)或合作(9%)的方法,而没有公民主导的研究。纳入的公民科学项目的文化参与质量总体上是积极的,尽管有一些领域需要改进,特别是明确的土著研究领导和治理,以及关于研究产生的文化和知识产权权利的透明协议。结论关注土著人民和社区健康相关问题的公民科学项目相对较少。这种方法是否有潜力丰富目前以社区为基础的参与式或共同设计的土著社区健康促进方法,仍有待确定。那又怎样?未来涉及土著人民和社区的公民科学项目应该优先考虑和支持土著领导的公民科学方法,在这些方法中,社区发起、领导和管理研究过程。文化参与的质量可以得到改善,特别是在由土著领导的研究治理以及获得和保护土著知识和文化财产的权利方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信