{"title":"Toward a theory of sustainable resource integration","authors":"Rolf Findsrud, Martin Hanssen, David Sörhammar","doi":"10.1007/s13162-025-00315-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The concept of sustainability has fostered increased interest among service researchers, particularly in relation to making service ecosystems more sustainable. While this growing body of work has examined relevant drivers and barriers and explored strategies for facilitating such transitions, the concept of sustainable resource integration remains underdeveloped. With no clear definition to guide research and practice, the need for theorizing resource integration from a sustainability perspective is key. To address this gap, the present study employed a theory adaptation approach, drawing on service-dominant logic (domain theory) and sustainability and circular economy (method theories) to define sustainable resource integration as using resources in ways that are materially supportable, performatively viable, and temporally adaptive, such that the activities can be continued without undermining the systemic conditions it depends upon. In addition to a definition, the paper provides three propositions as a foundation for theorizing sustainable resource integration and its role in the evolution of service ecosystems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"15 1-2","pages":"142 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13162-025-00315-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-025-00315-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The concept of sustainability has fostered increased interest among service researchers, particularly in relation to making service ecosystems more sustainable. While this growing body of work has examined relevant drivers and barriers and explored strategies for facilitating such transitions, the concept of sustainable resource integration remains underdeveloped. With no clear definition to guide research and practice, the need for theorizing resource integration from a sustainability perspective is key. To address this gap, the present study employed a theory adaptation approach, drawing on service-dominant logic (domain theory) and sustainability and circular economy (method theories) to define sustainable resource integration as using resources in ways that are materially supportable, performatively viable, and temporally adaptive, such that the activities can be continued without undermining the systemic conditions it depends upon. In addition to a definition, the paper provides three propositions as a foundation for theorizing sustainable resource integration and its role in the evolution of service ecosystems.
AMS ReviewBusiness, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍:
The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication. The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.