Striking dynamic balance between functional and structural sustainability in service ecosystems

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
Petter Braathen
{"title":"Striking dynamic balance between functional and structural sustainability in service ecosystems","authors":"Petter Braathen","doi":"10.1007/s13162-025-00305-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainable service provision in large-scale and complex ecosystems requires balancing structural resilience with functional alignment. This paper proposes a holistic framework for service ecosystem sustainability, conceptualizing these dual dimensions as (1) structural sustainability—the system’s capacity for self-maintenance and resilience—and (2) functional sustainability—the system’s ability to uphold the broader macrosystem it depends on. These concepts are integrated into a sustainability state map that distinguishes four possible holistic states, each reflecting unique challenges and opportunities. Building on complex adaptive systems theory and the notion of adaptive cycles, the paper illustrates how service ecosystems traverse these states as they respond to internal tensions and external pressures. We further explain how strategy models such as exploration-exploitation, ambidexterity, and creative destruction can deliberately guide service ecosystems between states to maintain—or recover—holistic sustainability. In doing so, the framework elucidates why sustainability is inherently dynamic and evolutionary, shaped by multilevel interactions spanning individuals, organizations, and societal institutions. Ultimately, we offer scholars, practitioners, and policymakers a diagnostic tool and a set of strategic interventions to navigate sustainability transitions more effectively in service ecosystems facing persistent social and environmental concerns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"15 1-2","pages":"112 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13162-025-00305-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-025-00305-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainable service provision in large-scale and complex ecosystems requires balancing structural resilience with functional alignment. This paper proposes a holistic framework for service ecosystem sustainability, conceptualizing these dual dimensions as (1) structural sustainability—the system’s capacity for self-maintenance and resilience—and (2) functional sustainability—the system’s ability to uphold the broader macrosystem it depends on. These concepts are integrated into a sustainability state map that distinguishes four possible holistic states, each reflecting unique challenges and opportunities. Building on complex adaptive systems theory and the notion of adaptive cycles, the paper illustrates how service ecosystems traverse these states as they respond to internal tensions and external pressures. We further explain how strategy models such as exploration-exploitation, ambidexterity, and creative destruction can deliberately guide service ecosystems between states to maintain—or recover—holistic sustainability. In doing so, the framework elucidates why sustainability is inherently dynamic and evolutionary, shaped by multilevel interactions spanning individuals, organizations, and societal institutions. Ultimately, we offer scholars, practitioners, and policymakers a diagnostic tool and a set of strategic interventions to navigate sustainability transitions more effectively in service ecosystems facing persistent social and environmental concerns.

在服务生态系统的功能可持续性和结构可持续性之间取得动态平衡
在大规模和复杂的生态系统中提供可持续的服务需要平衡结构弹性和功能一致性。本文提出了一个服务生态系统可持续性的整体框架,将这两个维度概念化为:(1)结构可持续性——系统自我维持和恢复的能力;(2)功能可持续性——系统维护其所依赖的更广泛宏观系统的能力。这些概念被整合到可持续性状态图中,该图区分了四种可能的整体状态,每种状态都反映了独特的挑战和机遇。本文以复杂适应系统理论和适应周期的概念为基础,阐述了服务生态系统在应对内部紧张和外部压力时如何穿越这些状态。我们进一步解释了诸如探索-开发、双灵巧性和创造性破坏等战略模型如何有意识地引导状态之间的服务生态系统保持或恢复整体可持续性。在此过程中,该框架阐明了为什么可持续性本质上是动态和进化的,是由跨越个人、组织和社会机构的多层次互动形成的。最终,我们为学者、从业者和政策制定者提供了一个诊断工具和一套战略干预措施,以便在面临持续的社会和环境问题的服务生态系统中更有效地引导可持续性转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AMS Review
AMS Review Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication.  The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信