{"title":"S12-04 Developments and potential applications of epigenetic tools for chemical hazard assessment","authors":"M. Jacobs","doi":"10.1016/j.toxlet.2025.07.082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Epigenetic modulations underlie critical developmental processes that contribute to determining adult phenotypes (physiological outcomes). They involve a series of mechanisms that entail histone and DNA covalent modifications and non-coding RNAs, which collectively contribute to programming cell functions and differentiation. Epigenetic anomalies and DNA mutations are co-drivers of cellular dysfunction pathways, from endocrine disruption (Greally and Jacobs 2013, Jacobs <em>et al.</em> 2017), to metabolic and immune disruption and ultimately carcinogenesis (Jacobs <em>et al.</em> 2020, Desaulniers <em>et al.</em> 2021, Louekari and Jacobs 2024). Test methods that can be adapted to measure and monitor key epigenetic marks in response to toxicant exposure could already be providing a valuable tool for predicting adverse health outcomes. However the evidence basis for regulatory purposes needs to be translated from <em>in vivo</em> to <em>in vitro</em> and strengthened experimentally. Furthermore, how such tests could be combined into and be interpreted by integrated approaches for testing and assessment of chemicals needs to be clearly described to assist test method developers, regulators and policy makers. These considerations will be discussed, with examples, in my presentation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23206,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology letters","volume":"411 ","pages":"Page S27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378427425016650","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Epigenetic modulations underlie critical developmental processes that contribute to determining adult phenotypes (physiological outcomes). They involve a series of mechanisms that entail histone and DNA covalent modifications and non-coding RNAs, which collectively contribute to programming cell functions and differentiation. Epigenetic anomalies and DNA mutations are co-drivers of cellular dysfunction pathways, from endocrine disruption (Greally and Jacobs 2013, Jacobs et al. 2017), to metabolic and immune disruption and ultimately carcinogenesis (Jacobs et al. 2020, Desaulniers et al. 2021, Louekari and Jacobs 2024). Test methods that can be adapted to measure and monitor key epigenetic marks in response to toxicant exposure could already be providing a valuable tool for predicting adverse health outcomes. However the evidence basis for regulatory purposes needs to be translated from in vivo to in vitro and strengthened experimentally. Furthermore, how such tests could be combined into and be interpreted by integrated approaches for testing and assessment of chemicals needs to be clearly described to assist test method developers, regulators and policy makers. These considerations will be discussed, with examples, in my presentation.
表观遗传调节是决定成人表型(生理结果)的关键发育过程的基础。它们涉及一系列机制,包括组蛋白和DNA共价修饰以及非编码rna,它们共同有助于编程细胞功能和分化。表观遗传异常和DNA突变是细胞功能障碍途径的共同驱动因素,从内分泌干扰(Greally and Jacobs 2013, Jacobs et al. 2017),到代谢和免疫干扰,并最终致癌(Jacobs et al. 2020, Desaulniers et al. 2021, Louekari and Jacobs 2024)。可用于测量和监测对有毒物质接触的关键表观遗传标记的测试方法可能已经为预测不良健康结果提供了有价值的工具。然而,监管目的的证据基础需要从体内转化到体外,并在实验上得到加强。此外,需要明确说明如何将这些测试纳入化学品测试和评估的综合方法并加以解释,以协助测试方法的开发人员、监管机构和决策者。这些考虑将在我的报告中通过实例加以讨论。