Exploring the Role of Dialogue and Technology in Students’ Development and Utilization of Representations in Chemistry

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Fatma Yaman*,  and , Brian Hand, 
{"title":"Exploring the Role of Dialogue and Technology in Students’ Development and Utilization of Representations in Chemistry","authors":"Fatma Yaman*,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Brian Hand,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study investigates how preservice science teachers (PSTs) develop and utilize representations in chemistry when they engage in argument-based inquiry environments using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach. The data-transformation variant of convergent design, which is a particular form of mixed method research, was used in the study. There were three studies: minimal dialogue (SWH-MD), rich dialogue (SWH-RD) and rich dialogue with technology (SWH-RDT). The participants consisted of 32 PSTs (3 for the first study, 9 for the second study, and 20 for the third study) who enrolled in the Chemistry 1 course in different years and participated in 10 activities over one semester. A total of 320 SWH lab reports were analyzed: 30 in the first study, 90 in the second study, and 200 in the third study. Each of the PSTs’ laboratory reports were analyzed considering multiple levels of representations utilized (macroscopic, microscopic, symbolic and algebraic), and the SWH components (design, observation, claim, evidence, and reflection). The results highlighted that the PSTs’ representational competency increased over time in all studies. As studies shifted from minimal dialogue to rich dialogue with technology, PSTs started using more connected and different types of representations. Even though there is no difference when using technology in the total percentage of representations use, the results show that PSTs use the microscopic level in a more connected way, earlier in time (such as development phase) and throughout the components of the SWH approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 9","pages":"3793–3806"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c01523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how preservice science teachers (PSTs) develop and utilize representations in chemistry when they engage in argument-based inquiry environments using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach. The data-transformation variant of convergent design, which is a particular form of mixed method research, was used in the study. There were three studies: minimal dialogue (SWH-MD), rich dialogue (SWH-RD) and rich dialogue with technology (SWH-RDT). The participants consisted of 32 PSTs (3 for the first study, 9 for the second study, and 20 for the third study) who enrolled in the Chemistry 1 course in different years and participated in 10 activities over one semester. A total of 320 SWH lab reports were analyzed: 30 in the first study, 90 in the second study, and 200 in the third study. Each of the PSTs’ laboratory reports were analyzed considering multiple levels of representations utilized (macroscopic, microscopic, symbolic and algebraic), and the SWH components (design, observation, claim, evidence, and reflection). The results highlighted that the PSTs’ representational competency increased over time in all studies. As studies shifted from minimal dialogue to rich dialogue with technology, PSTs started using more connected and different types of representations. Even though there is no difference when using technology in the total percentage of representations use, the results show that PSTs use the microscopic level in a more connected way, earlier in time (such as development phase) and throughout the components of the SWH approach.

Abstract Image

探讨对话和技术在学生化学表征的发展和利用中的作用
本研究调查了职前科学教师(pst)在使用科学写作启发式(SWH)方法从事基于论证的探究环境时如何发展和利用化学表征。本文采用了混合方法研究的一种特殊形式——收敛设计的数据变换变体。有三个研究:最小对话(SWH-MD)、丰富对话(SWH-RD)和丰富技术对话(SWH-RDT)。参与者包括32名pst(第一项研究3名,第二项研究9名,第三项研究20名),他们在不同的年份注册了化学1课程,在一个学期内参加了10项活动。总共分析了320份SWH实验室报告:第一项研究30份,第二项研究90份,第三项研究200份。每个pst的实验室报告都考虑了多个层次的表征(宏观、微观、符号和代数),以及SWH成分(设计、观察、主张、证据和反思)。结果强调,在所有研究中,pst的代表性能力随着时间的推移而增加。随着研究从最小的对话转向与技术的丰富对话,pst开始使用更多连接和不同类型的表示。尽管在使用技术时,表示使用的总百分比没有差异,但结果表明,pst以更紧密的方式、更早的时间(如开发阶段)和整个SWH方法的组成部分使用微观层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信