Think–Pair–Chatbot–Share: AI-Facilitated Peer Learning in Chemistry

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Pierre J. P. Naeyaert*, Liam R. J. Scarratt, Thomas Murphy and Reyne Pullen*, 
{"title":"Think–Pair–Chatbot–Share: AI-Facilitated Peer Learning in Chemistry","authors":"Pierre J. P. Naeyaert*,&nbsp;Liam R. J. Scarratt,&nbsp;Thomas Murphy and Reyne Pullen*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study introduces and evaluates the Think–Pair–Chatbot–Share (TPCS) model, an adaptation of the traditional Think–Pair–Share (TPS) framework where a generative AI (Gen-AI) chatbot is integrated to scaffold learning and provide feedback. We compared first-year chemistry students learning ionization energy and atomic structure using traditional TPS versus the Gen-AI-facilitated TPCS model. Student responses from both think and share stages were analyzed for accuracy and common errors, while engagement was examined via participation rates. Results indicate that for students who completed all stages, the Gen-AI-facilitated TPCS group recorded a higher proportion of correct share stage responses in three of the four tasks. However, the Gen-AI-facilitated TPCS intervention was associated with lower overall participation, suggesting potential challenges related to sustained engagement with the Gen-AI-facilitated, multitask activity. These findings offer the first classroom-level evidence of AI-mediated TPS in action within tertiary chemistry education and underscore both its instructional potential and the challenges in maintaining engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 9","pages":"3936–3944"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00438","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study introduces and evaluates the Think–Pair–Chatbot–Share (TPCS) model, an adaptation of the traditional Think–Pair–Share (TPS) framework where a generative AI (Gen-AI) chatbot is integrated to scaffold learning and provide feedback. We compared first-year chemistry students learning ionization energy and atomic structure using traditional TPS versus the Gen-AI-facilitated TPCS model. Student responses from both think and share stages were analyzed for accuracy and common errors, while engagement was examined via participation rates. Results indicate that for students who completed all stages, the Gen-AI-facilitated TPCS group recorded a higher proportion of correct share stage responses in three of the four tasks. However, the Gen-AI-facilitated TPCS intervention was associated with lower overall participation, suggesting potential challenges related to sustained engagement with the Gen-AI-facilitated, multitask activity. These findings offer the first classroom-level evidence of AI-mediated TPS in action within tertiary chemistry education and underscore both its instructional potential and the challenges in maintaining engagement.

Abstract Image

思考-配对-聊天-分享:人工智能促进化学中的同伴学习
本研究介绍并评估了Think-Pair-Chatbot-Share (TPCS)模型,该模型是对传统Think-Pair-Share (TPS)框架的改编,其中集成了生成式AI (Gen-AI)聊天机器人来支持学习并提供反馈。我们比较了一年级化学学生使用传统的TPS和gen - ai促进的TPCS模型学习电离能和原子结构。研究人员分析了学生在思考和分享阶段的回答的准确性和常见错误,并通过参与率考察了参与度。结果表明,对于完成所有阶段的学生,gen - ai促进的TPCS组在四个任务中的三个任务中记录了更高比例的正确分享阶段反应。然而,gen - ai促进的TPCS干预与较低的总体参与度相关,这表明与gen - ai促进的多任务活动的持续参与相关的潜在挑战。这些发现为人工智能介导的TPS在高等化学教育中的作用提供了第一个课堂水平的证据,并强调了其教学潜力和保持参与的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信