Effect of a treatment strategy utilising golimumab, methotrexate and corticosteroids versus methotrexate and corticosteroids in early, untreated psoriatic arthritis (GOLMePsA): a single-centre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial

IF 16.4 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Gabriele De Marco PhD , Elizabeth M A Hensor PhD , Prof Philip S Helliwell PhD , Shabina Sultan MD , Sayam R Dubash MD , Xabier Michelena PhD , Prof Laura C Coates PhD , Prof Paul Emery PhD , Ai Lyn Tan MD , Prof Dennis McGonagle PhD , Prof Helena Marzo-Ortega PhD
{"title":"Effect of a treatment strategy utilising golimumab, methotrexate and corticosteroids versus methotrexate and corticosteroids in early, untreated psoriatic arthritis (GOLMePsA): a single-centre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial","authors":"Gabriele De Marco PhD ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M A Hensor PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Philip S Helliwell PhD ,&nbsp;Shabina Sultan MD ,&nbsp;Sayam R Dubash MD ,&nbsp;Xabier Michelena PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Laura C Coates PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Paul Emery PhD ,&nbsp;Ai Lyn Tan MD ,&nbsp;Prof Dennis McGonagle PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Helena Marzo-Ortega PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2665-9913(25)00156-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The optimal treatment strategy in early psoriatic arthritis remains unknown. We aimed to assess whether the combination of methotrexate and golimumab plus corticosteroids is superior to methotrexate plus corticosteroids in reducing disease activity in early, untreated psoriatic arthritis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-centre study in adults with treatment-naïve active psoriatic arthritis. Participants were required to have been diagnosed up to 24 months before enrolment and had to be naïve to conventional synthetic, biologic, or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or systemic treatments before enrolment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either combination therapy of golimumab and methotrexate or placebo and methotrexate, stratified by the number of involved peripheral joints at baseline. Investigators and participants were masked to treatment allocation. At baseline, all participants received methylprednisolone (120 mg intramuscular administration, single dose) and commenced weekly methotrexate (increased to 25 mg within 28 days). Golimumab or placebo were administered by subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks. By week 24, additional methylprednisolone was permitted once (totalling up to 240 mg exposure). The primary endpoint was the difference in mean Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at week 24 in the intention-to-treat population, compared using analysis of covariance via multiple linear regression. People with lived experience of psoriatic arthritis were involved in the design and conduct the study. The study was registered with EudraCT, 2013-004122-28, and is complete.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Between Nov 3, 2015 and Jan 26, 2022, 106 people were assessed for eligibility, 22 were excluded, and 84 were randomly assigned (43 to the golimumab and methotrexate group and 41 to the placebo and methotrexate group). 46 (55%) participants were male and 38 (45%) were female. The mean age was 42·5 years (SD 12·4) and 61 (73%) participants were White and seven (8%) were from any Asian, Black, or other ethnic background. PASDAS did not differ between treatment groups at week 24 (unadjusted mean 3·09 [SD 1·32] in the placebo and methotrexate group and 2·70 [1·38] in the golimumab and methotrexate group; adjusted difference –0·55 [95% CI –1·12 to 0·03]; p=0·064). More participants in the placebo and methotrexate group received additional corticosteroids before week 24 (20 [49%] of 41 <em>vs</em> nine [21%] of 43; odds ratio 0·28 [95% CI 0·11 to 0·72]; p=0·009). Similar numbers of participants had adverse events (38 [93%] of 41 in the placebo and methotrexate group <em>vs</em> 41 [95%] of 43 in the golimumab and methotrexate group; risk difference 0·03 [95% CI –0·09 to 0·15]), although altered laboratory investigations and infections occurred more frequently in the golimumab and methotrexate group. No deaths, serious, or unexpected adverse events occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Both interventions led to improved disease activity in patients with early, untreated psoriatic arthritis, without a clinically or statistically significant difference in PASDAS between treatment groups at week 24. Participants in the placebo and methotrexate group required more rescue corticosteroids. Sustained results were observed at week 52 in both groups, without serious or unexpected adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>Janssen Biologics BV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48540,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Rheumatology","volume":"7 11","pages":"Pages e776-e788"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665991325001560","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The optimal treatment strategy in early psoriatic arthritis remains unknown. We aimed to assess whether the combination of methotrexate and golimumab plus corticosteroids is superior to methotrexate plus corticosteroids in reducing disease activity in early, untreated psoriatic arthritis.

Methods

We did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-centre study in adults with treatment-naïve active psoriatic arthritis. Participants were required to have been diagnosed up to 24 months before enrolment and had to be naïve to conventional synthetic, biologic, or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or systemic treatments before enrolment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either combination therapy of golimumab and methotrexate or placebo and methotrexate, stratified by the number of involved peripheral joints at baseline. Investigators and participants were masked to treatment allocation. At baseline, all participants received methylprednisolone (120 mg intramuscular administration, single dose) and commenced weekly methotrexate (increased to 25 mg within 28 days). Golimumab or placebo were administered by subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks. By week 24, additional methylprednisolone was permitted once (totalling up to 240 mg exposure). The primary endpoint was the difference in mean Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at week 24 in the intention-to-treat population, compared using analysis of covariance via multiple linear regression. People with lived experience of psoriatic arthritis were involved in the design and conduct the study. The study was registered with EudraCT, 2013-004122-28, and is complete.

Findings

Between Nov 3, 2015 and Jan 26, 2022, 106 people were assessed for eligibility, 22 were excluded, and 84 were randomly assigned (43 to the golimumab and methotrexate group and 41 to the placebo and methotrexate group). 46 (55%) participants were male and 38 (45%) were female. The mean age was 42·5 years (SD 12·4) and 61 (73%) participants were White and seven (8%) were from any Asian, Black, or other ethnic background. PASDAS did not differ between treatment groups at week 24 (unadjusted mean 3·09 [SD 1·32] in the placebo and methotrexate group and 2·70 [1·38] in the golimumab and methotrexate group; adjusted difference –0·55 [95% CI –1·12 to 0·03]; p=0·064). More participants in the placebo and methotrexate group received additional corticosteroids before week 24 (20 [49%] of 41 vs nine [21%] of 43; odds ratio 0·28 [95% CI 0·11 to 0·72]; p=0·009). Similar numbers of participants had adverse events (38 [93%] of 41 in the placebo and methotrexate group vs 41 [95%] of 43 in the golimumab and methotrexate group; risk difference 0·03 [95% CI –0·09 to 0·15]), although altered laboratory investigations and infections occurred more frequently in the golimumab and methotrexate group. No deaths, serious, or unexpected adverse events occurred.

Interpretation

Both interventions led to improved disease activity in patients with early, untreated psoriatic arthritis, without a clinically or statistically significant difference in PASDAS between treatment groups at week 24. Participants in the placebo and methotrexate group required more rescue corticosteroids. Sustained results were observed at week 52 in both groups, without serious or unexpected adverse events.

Funding

Janssen Biologics BV.
在早期未经治疗的银屑病关节炎(GOLMePsA)中,使用戈利单抗、甲氨蝶呤和皮质类固醇与使用甲氨蝶呤和皮质类固醇的治疗策略的效果:一项单中心、双盲、平行组、随机对照试验。
背景:早期银屑病关节炎的最佳治疗策略尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估甲氨蝶呤和戈利单抗加皮质类固醇联合治疗在降低早期未经治疗的银屑病关节炎的疾病活动性方面是否优于甲氨蝶呤加皮质类固醇。方法:我们对患有treatment-naïve活动性银屑病关节炎的成人患者进行了一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、平行组、单中心研究。受试者被要求在入组前24个月进行诊断,并且必须在入组前naïve接受常规合成、生物或靶向合成疾病改善抗风湿药物或全身治疗。参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受戈利木单抗和甲氨蝶呤联合治疗或安慰剂和甲氨蝶呤联合治疗,根据基线时受累的外周关节数量分层。调查人员和参与者对治疗分配不知情。在基线时,所有参与者接受甲强的松龙(120 mg肌肉注射,单剂量),并开始每周服用甲氨蝶呤(28天内增加到25 mg)。Golimumab或安慰剂每4周皮下注射一次。到第24周,甲强的松龙被允许额外使用一次(总计240毫克)。主要终点是意向治疗人群第24周平均银屑病关节炎疾病活动评分(PASDAS)的差异,通过多元线性回归进行协方差分析进行比较。有银屑病关节炎生活经验的人参与了研究的设计和实施。本研究已在EudraCT注册,编号为2013-004122-28,现已完成。研究结果:在2015年11月3日至2022年1月26日期间,106人被评估为合格,22人被排除,84人被随机分配(43人被分配到戈利单抗和甲氨蝶呤组,41人被分配到安慰剂和甲氨蝶呤组)。46人(55%)为男性,38人(45%)为女性。平均年龄为42.5岁(标准差为12.4),白人61人(73%),亚洲人、黑人或其他种族背景的人7人(8%)。治疗组间PASDAS在第24周无差异(安慰剂组和甲氨蝶呤组未经校正的平均值为3.09 [SD 1.32],戈利单抗组和甲氨蝶呤组未经校正的平均值为2.70[1.38];校正后的差异为- 0.55 [95% CI - 1.12至0.03];p= 0.064)。安慰剂和甲氨蝶呤组更多的参与者在第24周之前接受了额外的皮质类固醇治疗(41例中有20例[49%]vs 43例中有9例[21%];优势比为0.28 [95% CI 0.11 ~ 0.72]; p= 0.009)。相似数量的参与者出现不良事件(安慰剂和甲氨蝶呤组41人中的38人[93%]vs戈利单抗和甲氨蝶呤组43人中的41人[95%];风险差异为0.03 [95% CI - 0.09至0.15]),尽管戈利单抗和甲氨蝶呤组改变了实验室调查和感染发生的频率。未发生死亡、严重或意外不良事件。解释:两种干预措施均可改善早期未经治疗的银屑病关节炎患者的疾病活动性,在第24周时,两组间PASDAS无临床或统计学显著差异。安慰剂组和甲氨蝶呤组需要更多的皮质类固醇。在52周时,两组均观察到持续的结果,未发生严重或意外的不良事件。资助:Janssen Biologics BV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Rheumatology
Lancet Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
34.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
279
期刊介绍: The Lancet Rheumatology, an independent journal, is dedicated to publishing content relevant to rheumatology specialists worldwide. It focuses on studies that advance clinical practice, challenge existing norms, and advocate for changes in health policy. The journal covers clinical research, particularly clinical trials, expert reviews, and thought-provoking commentary on the diagnosis, classification, management, and prevention of rheumatic diseases, including arthritis, musculoskeletal disorders, connective tissue diseases, and immune system disorders. Additionally, it publishes high-quality translational studies supported by robust clinical data, prioritizing those that identify potential new therapeutic targets, advance precision medicine efforts, or directly contribute to future clinical trials. With its strong clinical orientation, The Lancet Rheumatology serves as an independent voice for the rheumatology community, advocating strongly for the enhancement of patients' lives affected by rheumatic diseases worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信