The efficacy of the remote monitoring system following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Takuya Ogami, Cezar S Staniloae, Hany Habib, Michael Querijero, Stephanie Gaudio, Mathew R Williams
{"title":"The efficacy of the remote monitoring system following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.","authors":"Takuya Ogami, Cezar S Staniloae, Hany Habib, Michael Querijero, Stephanie Gaudio, Mathew R Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a cornerstone in the management of aortic valve disease. However, delayed complications after hospital discharge and readmission remain in an issue following TAVR. We aimed to evaluate the impact of remote monitoring systems on clinical outcomes after TAVR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent TAVR from September 2014 through January 2019 were included retrospectively. Additionally, all patients, clinically indicated for TAVR from 9/1/2018 through 8/30/2021, were screened, and patients who agreed were prospectively enrolled. Medtronic Care Management Service (MCMS) was used to monitor patients following TAVR after discharge (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1078 patients were included. Among them, 843 (78.2 %) patients were discharged with MCMS (MCMS group) and 235 (21.8 %) patients were discharged without (non-MCMS group). Overall, the mean age was 81.5 years, and mean STS-PROM was 5.53 %. Baseline conduction defect was observed in 427 (39.6 %). Peripheral artery disease was more common in the MCMS group while a history of myocardial infarction was more likely seen in the non-MCMS group. After propensity-score matching, length of hospital stays was significantly shorter in the MCMS group (1.42 days vs. 1.82 days in the non-MCMS group, p < 0.001). Readmission rates and new permanent pacemaker insertion rates were similar between the two groups. All-cause mortality, 30-day and 90-day mortality were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MCMS was easily applicable to a clinical practice and may reduce length of hospital stays in patients undergoing TAVR without increasing readmission or mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.08.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a cornerstone in the management of aortic valve disease. However, delayed complications after hospital discharge and readmission remain in an issue following TAVR. We aimed to evaluate the impact of remote monitoring systems on clinical outcomes after TAVR.

Methods: All patients who underwent TAVR from September 2014 through January 2019 were included retrospectively. Additionally, all patients, clinically indicated for TAVR from 9/1/2018 through 8/30/2021, were screened, and patients who agreed were prospectively enrolled. Medtronic Care Management Service (MCMS) was used to monitor patients following TAVR after discharge (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN).

Results: A total of 1078 patients were included. Among them, 843 (78.2 %) patients were discharged with MCMS (MCMS group) and 235 (21.8 %) patients were discharged without (non-MCMS group). Overall, the mean age was 81.5 years, and mean STS-PROM was 5.53 %. Baseline conduction defect was observed in 427 (39.6 %). Peripheral artery disease was more common in the MCMS group while a history of myocardial infarction was more likely seen in the non-MCMS group. After propensity-score matching, length of hospital stays was significantly shorter in the MCMS group (1.42 days vs. 1.82 days in the non-MCMS group, p < 0.001). Readmission rates and new permanent pacemaker insertion rates were similar between the two groups. All-cause mortality, 30-day and 90-day mortality were comparable between the groups.

Conclusions: MCMS was easily applicable to a clinical practice and may reduce length of hospital stays in patients undergoing TAVR without increasing readmission or mortality.

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后远程监测系统的疗效。
背景:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)已成为主动脉瓣疾病治疗的基石。然而,TAVR术后出院和再入院后的延迟并发症仍然是一个问题。我们的目的是评估远程监测系统对TAVR后临床结果的影响。方法:回顾性分析2014年9月至2019年1月期间所有接受TAVR的患者。此外,对2018年1月9日至2021年8月30日期间临床适应症为TAVR的所有患者进行了筛查,同意的患者被纳入前瞻性研究。使用美敦力护理管理服务(MCMS)监测出院后TAVR患者(Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN)。结果:共纳入1078例患者。其中,843例(78.2%)患者出院时伴有MCMS (MCMS组),235例(21.8%)患者出院时无MCMS(非MCMS组)。总体而言,平均年龄为81.5岁,平均STS-PROM为5.53%。基线传导缺损427例(39.6%)。外周动脉疾病在MCMS组中更常见,而心肌梗死史在非MCMS组中更常见。在倾向评分匹配后,MCMS组的住院时间明显缩短(1.42天,非MCMS组为1.82天)。结论:MCMS易于应用于临床实践,可以缩短TAVR患者的住院时间,而不会增加再入院率或死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信