Future-Proofing European Pharmaceutical Regulatory and Market Access Practices Based on EU Learnings from the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from Multi-Stakeholder Interviews.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Zilke Claessens, Grace Beirne, Catherine Decouttere, Nico Vandaele, Liese Barbier, Isabelle Huys
{"title":"Future-Proofing European Pharmaceutical Regulatory and Market Access Practices Based on EU Learnings from the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from Multi-Stakeholder Interviews.","authors":"Zilke Claessens, Grace Beirne, Catherine Decouttere, Nico Vandaele, Liese Barbier, Isabelle Huys","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00855-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, regulatory and market access actions were taken to expedite the market entry of COVID-19 medicines. This study aims to (i) capture multi-stakeholder views on these actions, and (ii) provide recommendations for future-proofing routine and health-emergency frameworks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with policy makers/advisors (i.e. regulators, HTA assessors, and payers), and pharmaceutical industry representatives across Europe to elicit their perspectives on marketing authorisation and market access practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interviews were transcribed ad verbatim and transcripts analysed via the thematic framework method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interviews (n = 16) resulted in an overview of stakeholder-perceived benefits and limitations for four key regulatory advice or authorisation procedures (i.e. emergency task force, rapid scientific advice, rolling review, conditional marketing authorisation) and one market access procedure (i.e. joint procurement) applied during the COVID-19 pandemic. Highlighted benefits of the procedures relate to a reduction in timelines, enhanced collaboration and alignment, procedural flexibilities, and often a combination of these. Challenges are linked to inefficient allocation of time and resources for both industry representatives and policymakers/advisors and decreased transparency in certain procedures. In addition, several recommendations for the optimisation of both the routine and health-emergency healthcare framework were proposed. Emphasis is placed on the need for enhanced interaction and alignment between industry representatives and policymakers/advisors but also within stakeholder groups, development of more pragmatic and flexible procedures, and application of clear and transparent eligibility criteria for facilitating actions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides an overview of the perceptions from regulatory, and market access practices during COVID-19, highlighting how these experiences can inform regulatory and market access practices both in routine times and during health emergencies. Taking stock of stakeholder reflections and lessons learned are valuable for improving preparedness and responsiveness in future health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00855-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, regulatory and market access actions were taken to expedite the market entry of COVID-19 medicines. This study aims to (i) capture multi-stakeholder views on these actions, and (ii) provide recommendations for future-proofing routine and health-emergency frameworks.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with policy makers/advisors (i.e. regulators, HTA assessors, and payers), and pharmaceutical industry representatives across Europe to elicit their perspectives on marketing authorisation and market access practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interviews were transcribed ad verbatim and transcripts analysed via the thematic framework method.

Results: The interviews (n = 16) resulted in an overview of stakeholder-perceived benefits and limitations for four key regulatory advice or authorisation procedures (i.e. emergency task force, rapid scientific advice, rolling review, conditional marketing authorisation) and one market access procedure (i.e. joint procurement) applied during the COVID-19 pandemic. Highlighted benefits of the procedures relate to a reduction in timelines, enhanced collaboration and alignment, procedural flexibilities, and often a combination of these. Challenges are linked to inefficient allocation of time and resources for both industry representatives and policymakers/advisors and decreased transparency in certain procedures. In addition, several recommendations for the optimisation of both the routine and health-emergency healthcare framework were proposed. Emphasis is placed on the need for enhanced interaction and alignment between industry representatives and policymakers/advisors but also within stakeholder groups, development of more pragmatic and flexible procedures, and application of clear and transparent eligibility criteria for facilitating actions.

Conclusion: This study provides an overview of the perceptions from regulatory, and market access practices during COVID-19, highlighting how these experiences can inform regulatory and market access practices both in routine times and during health emergencies. Taking stock of stakeholder reflections and lessons learned are valuable for improving preparedness and responsiveness in future health crises.

基于欧盟从COVID-19大流行中学到的经验,面向未来的欧洲药品监管和市场准入实践:来自多方利益相关者访谈的见解。
导言:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,采取了监管和市场准入行动,加快了COVID-19药物的市场准入。本研究旨在(i)收集多方利益攸关方对这些行动的看法,以及(ii)为未来的常规和突发卫生事件框架提供建议。方法:对欧洲各地的政策制定者/顾问(即监管机构、HTA评估人员和支付方)和制药行业代表进行了半结构化访谈,以了解他们对2019冠状病毒病大流行期间上市许可和市场准入实践的看法。采访被逐字记录下来,并通过主题框架方法对记录进行分析。结果:访谈(n = 16)概述了在COVID-19大流行期间应用的四种关键监管咨询或授权程序(即紧急工作组、快速科学咨询、滚动审查、有条件上市许可)和一种市场准入程序(即联合采购)的利益相关者认为的好处和局限性。这些程序的突出好处与缩短时间、增强协作和一致性、程序灵活性以及通常是这些优点的组合有关。挑战与行业代表和政策制定者/顾问的时间和资源分配效率低下以及某些程序透明度降低有关。此外,还提出了一些建议,以优化常规和突发卫生保健框架。重点是需要加强行业代表与决策者/顾问之间以及利益相关者群体之间的互动和协调,制定更务实和灵活的程序,以及应用明确和透明的资格标准以促进行动。结论:本研究概述了COVID-19期间监管和市场准入实践的看法,强调了这些经验如何为日常工作和突发卫生事件期间的监管和市场准入实践提供信息。总结利益攸关方的思考和吸取的经验教训,对于改进对未来卫生危机的准备和反应能力是很有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信