Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases locally recurrent following initial radiosurgery.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-07 DOI:10.1007/s11060-025-05201-y
Jennifer C Hall, Keshav Goel, Yulia Lozko, Steven D Chang, David J Park, Yusuke S Hori, Fred C Lam, Deyaldeen AbuReesh, Scott Jackson, Gordon Li, Melanie Hayden-Gephart, Taryn Kaneko, Seema Nagpal, Iris C Gibbs, Elham Rahimy, John Byun, Katherine Jin, Erqi Pollom, Scott G Soltys
{"title":"Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases locally recurrent following initial radiosurgery.","authors":"Jennifer C Hall, Keshav Goel, Yulia Lozko, Steven D Chang, David J Park, Yusuke S Hori, Fred C Lam, Deyaldeen AbuReesh, Scott Jackson, Gordon Li, Melanie Hayden-Gephart, Taryn Kaneko, Seema Nagpal, Iris C Gibbs, Elham Rahimy, John Byun, Katherine Jin, Erqi Pollom, Scott G Soltys","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-05201-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We report outcomes of repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (rSRS) to sites of tumor progression following initial SRS. Additionally, we sought to determine if, at the time of recurrence following initial SRS, surgical resection of the tumor followed by SRS (surgery + rSRS) provided benefit compared to rSRS alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with rSRS for local recurrence after initial SRS. The cumulative incidences of LF and adverse radiation effect (ARE), with death as a competing risk, were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2004 to 2022, we identified 77 patients with 429 brain metastases treated with initial SRS, of which 97 metastases were treated with rSRS for salvage of LF following initial SRS; 49 metastases had resection prior to rSRS. Of the 429 brain metastases treated with initial SRS, the cumulative incidence of LF was 12.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.7-15.9] at 1 year; in 97 sites treated with rSRS, LF was 14.6% (95%CI 8.4-22.4) at 1 year. There was no significant difference (p = 0.3) in 1-year LF after surgery + rSRS [11.1% (95%CI 4.0-22.31)] versus rSRS alone [18.4% (95%CI 9.0-30.5)]. The 1-year rates of ARE were: 3.0% (95%CI 1.7-5.0%) for initial SRS (overall grade 1-4), 15.6% (95%CI 9.2-23.6) for rSRS (overall grade 1-4), and 12.6% (95%CI 6.8-20.1%) for rSRS (symptomatic grade 2-4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given that the 1-year local progression of 15% with rSRS is similar to the 13% of initial SRS, our data do not support that tumors recurrent after initial SRS are inherently radioresistant to salvage SRS. Tumor control must be balanced by the 1-year rates of adverse radiation effect (16% overall, 13% symptomatic).</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1271-1283"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05201-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We report outcomes of repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (rSRS) to sites of tumor progression following initial SRS. Additionally, we sought to determine if, at the time of recurrence following initial SRS, surgical resection of the tumor followed by SRS (surgery + rSRS) provided benefit compared to rSRS alone.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with rSRS for local recurrence after initial SRS. The cumulative incidences of LF and adverse radiation effect (ARE), with death as a competing risk, were estimated.

Results: From 2004 to 2022, we identified 77 patients with 429 brain metastases treated with initial SRS, of which 97 metastases were treated with rSRS for salvage of LF following initial SRS; 49 metastases had resection prior to rSRS. Of the 429 brain metastases treated with initial SRS, the cumulative incidence of LF was 12.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.7-15.9] at 1 year; in 97 sites treated with rSRS, LF was 14.6% (95%CI 8.4-22.4) at 1 year. There was no significant difference (p = 0.3) in 1-year LF after surgery + rSRS [11.1% (95%CI 4.0-22.31)] versus rSRS alone [18.4% (95%CI 9.0-30.5)]. The 1-year rates of ARE were: 3.0% (95%CI 1.7-5.0%) for initial SRS (overall grade 1-4), 15.6% (95%CI 9.2-23.6) for rSRS (overall grade 1-4), and 12.6% (95%CI 6.8-20.1%) for rSRS (symptomatic grade 2-4).

Conclusion: Given that the 1-year local progression of 15% with rSRS is similar to the 13% of initial SRS, our data do not support that tumors recurrent after initial SRS are inherently radioresistant to salvage SRS. Tumor control must be balanced by the 1-year rates of adverse radiation effect (16% overall, 13% symptomatic).

重复立体定向放射手术治疗脑转移瘤局部复发后,首次放射手术。
目的:我们报告首次立体定向放射治疗后肿瘤进展部位的重复立体定向放射治疗(rSRS)的结果。此外,我们试图确定在初始SRS后复发时,手术切除肿瘤后再进行SRS(手术+ rSRS)是否比单独rSRS更有利。方法:回顾性分析首次SRS后局部复发的rSRS患者。估计了以死亡为竞争风险的LF和不良辐射效应(ARE)的累积发生率。结果:从2004年到2022年,我们确定了77例429例接受初始SRS治疗的脑转移患者,其中97例转移患者在初始SRS后接受了rSRS治疗以挽救LF;49例转移灶在rSRS前已切除。在接受初始SRS治疗的429例脑转移患者中,1年时LF的累积发病率为12.6%[95%可信区间(CI) 9.7-15.9];在使用rSRS治疗的97个部位,1年生存率为14.6% (95%CI 8.4-22.4)。术后1年LF + rSRS组[11.1% (95%CI 4.0 ~ 22.31)]与单独rSRS组[18.4% (95%CI 9.0 ~ 30.5)]无显著差异(p = 0.3)。初始SRS(总分级1-4)的1年ARE发生率为3.0% (95%CI 1.7-5.0%), rSRS(总分级1-4)的1年ARE发生率为15.6% (95%CI 9.2-23.6), rSRS(症状级2-4)的1年ARE发生率为12.6% (95%CI 6.8-20.1%)。结论:考虑到rSRS的1年局部进展率为15%,与初始SRS的13%相似,我们的数据不支持初始SRS后复发的肿瘤固有地对补救性SRS具有放射抗性。肿瘤控制必须与1年不良放射反应率(总体16%,症状13%)相平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信