Optimizing ML classifiers for superior intrusion detection in resource-constrained smart homes

Rong Xu
{"title":"Optimizing ML classifiers for superior intrusion detection in resource-constrained smart homes","authors":"Rong Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcce.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Machine learning (ML) has indeed become essential to the enhancement of intrusion detection systems in different scenarios. It has become a critical barrier against various sophisticated cyber threats. Security vulnerabilities pose special challenges to smart homes, given that devices, sensors, and network connections make the ecosystem highly connected. Such systems improve convenience and efficiency but are generally based on hardware with limited processing power and storage capacity. Therefore, these are prone to a variety of potential attacks. To do so, an effective IDS would have to identify known and evolving threats at all the various vulnerable points, starting from network interfaces down to individual devices. This work tackles these challenges by designing and optimizing ML models that offer reliable intrusion detection tailored for resource-constrained smart home environments. This work argues for intrusion prediction in smart homes using the Extra Tree Classification (ETC) and Linear Discriminant Analysis Classification (LDAC). To strengthen these base models' predictive capability, this paper considered the use of 2 optimization algorithms: the Rider Optimization Algorithm (ROA) and the Aquila Optimizer (AO). The optimizers were integrated strategically with the base models for improved accuracy, thus giving rise to new hybrid models. The combination of ETC with AO provides the ETAO model, while ETC with ROA gives the ETRO model. In equal measure, the LDAC model combined with ROA gives the LDRO model, while that of the LDAC model combined with AO gives the LDAO model. Basically, these hybrid models aim to ensure better performance from a prediction perspective. In the test section, the ETAO model was head and shoulders above the others in this metric, with an excellent value of 0.984, while for the ETRO model, the second-best performing model achieved 0.975. Later on, looking at the entire section, the precision metric again scored highest with the ETAO model at 0.987, while the weakest performance was from the LDAO model, which had a value of 0.888.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100694,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering","volume":"7 ","pages":"Pages 58-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666307425000361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has indeed become essential to the enhancement of intrusion detection systems in different scenarios. It has become a critical barrier against various sophisticated cyber threats. Security vulnerabilities pose special challenges to smart homes, given that devices, sensors, and network connections make the ecosystem highly connected. Such systems improve convenience and efficiency but are generally based on hardware with limited processing power and storage capacity. Therefore, these are prone to a variety of potential attacks. To do so, an effective IDS would have to identify known and evolving threats at all the various vulnerable points, starting from network interfaces down to individual devices. This work tackles these challenges by designing and optimizing ML models that offer reliable intrusion detection tailored for resource-constrained smart home environments. This work argues for intrusion prediction in smart homes using the Extra Tree Classification (ETC) and Linear Discriminant Analysis Classification (LDAC). To strengthen these base models' predictive capability, this paper considered the use of 2 optimization algorithms: the Rider Optimization Algorithm (ROA) and the Aquila Optimizer (AO). The optimizers were integrated strategically with the base models for improved accuracy, thus giving rise to new hybrid models. The combination of ETC with AO provides the ETAO model, while ETC with ROA gives the ETRO model. In equal measure, the LDAC model combined with ROA gives the LDRO model, while that of the LDAC model combined with AO gives the LDAO model. Basically, these hybrid models aim to ensure better performance from a prediction perspective. In the test section, the ETAO model was head and shoulders above the others in this metric, with an excellent value of 0.984, while for the ETRO model, the second-best performing model achieved 0.975. Later on, looking at the entire section, the precision metric again scored highest with the ETAO model at 0.987, while the weakest performance was from the LDAO model, which had a value of 0.888.
优化机器学习分类器,在资源受限的智能家居中进行高级入侵检测
机器学习(ML)确实已经成为在不同场景下增强入侵检测系统的关键。它已成为抵御各种复杂网络威胁的关键屏障。安全漏洞给智能家居带来了特殊的挑战,因为设备、传感器和网络连接使生态系统高度相连。这类系统提高了便利性和效率,但通常基于处理能力和存储容量有限的硬件。因此,这些都容易受到各种潜在的攻击。要做到这一点,一个有效的IDS必须在所有不同的易受攻击点(从网络接口到单个设备)识别已知的和不断发展的威胁。这项工作通过设计和优化ML模型来解决这些挑战,这些模型为资源受限的智能家居环境提供了可靠的入侵检测。这项工作提出了使用额外树分类(ETC)和线性判别分析分类(LDAC)的智能家居入侵预测。为了增强这些基础模型的预测能力,本文考虑使用2种优化算法:Rider optimization Algorithm (ROA)和Aquila Optimizer (AO)。优化器与基本模型有策略地集成以提高精度,从而产生新的混合模型。ETC与AO的结合提供了ETAO模型,ETC与ROA的结合提供了ETRO模型。同样,LDAC模型与ROA结合得到LDRO模型,LDAC模型与AO结合得到LDAO模型。基本上,这些混合模型旨在从预测的角度确保更好的性能。在测试部分,ETAO模型在这一指标上的表现远远高于其他模型,达到了0.984的优异值,而对于ETRO模型,表现第二好的模型达到了0.975。稍后,查看整个部分,精度指标在ETAO模型中再次得分最高,为0.987,而LDAO模型的性能最差,其值为0.888。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信