Assessing grapevine water status and rootstock effects using vegetation indices from UAV and proximal sensors

IF 4.5 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Anderson de Jesus Pereira , Larissa Godarelli Farinassi , Bruno Ricardo Silva Costa , Israel de Oliveira Junior , Robson Argolo dos Santos , Lucio André de Castro Jorge , Luís Henrique Bassoi
{"title":"Assessing grapevine water status and rootstock effects using vegetation indices from UAV and proximal sensors","authors":"Anderson de Jesus Pereira ,&nbsp;Larissa Godarelli Farinassi ,&nbsp;Bruno Ricardo Silva Costa ,&nbsp;Israel de Oliveira Junior ,&nbsp;Robson Argolo dos Santos ,&nbsp;Lucio André de Castro Jorge ,&nbsp;Luís Henrique Bassoi","doi":"10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based sensing and proximal sensing are effective techniques for monitoring grapevine canopies through vegetation indices (VI), enabling the assessment of plant growth-related factors. This study aimed to evaluate whether VIs derived from both sensing platforms correlate with leaf grapevine and soil water status. The similarity between the two platforms in estimating VI and their effectiveness in detecting variations in plant growth associated with different rootstocks were examined. Grapevines cv. Syrah grafted onto IAC 572 and Paulsen 1103 rootstocks were monitored across a 1.1 ha vineyard in Southeastern Brazil. UAV-based sensing involved capturing images with a multispectral sensor mounted on an UAV, while proximal sensing was conducted by measuring canopy reflectance with an active sensor. The Normalized Difference Red Edge (NDRE) derived from UAV-based sensing showed the strongest correlation with stomatal conductance <em>g</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> (r = 0.84, p &lt; 0.001, pseudo-R<sup>2</sup> = 0.73) and relative leaf water content RLWC (r = 0.73, p &lt; 0.001, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.60). No significant correlation was observed between the soil water parameter θ at 0–0.2 m and VI estimates from either platform (p &gt; 0.05). Significant correlations (p &lt; 0.001) were found between NDRE (r = 0.70, pseudo-R<sup>2</sup> = 0,58) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) (r = 0.72, pseudo-R<sup>2</sup> = 0,54), derived from both sensing methods. Both indices also detected differences in grapevine vigor related to rootstock influence. UAV-based measures provided stronger correlations with these traits than proximal measurements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53227,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 101708"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing Applications-Society and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352938525002617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based sensing and proximal sensing are effective techniques for monitoring grapevine canopies through vegetation indices (VI), enabling the assessment of plant growth-related factors. This study aimed to evaluate whether VIs derived from both sensing platforms correlate with leaf grapevine and soil water status. The similarity between the two platforms in estimating VI and their effectiveness in detecting variations in plant growth associated with different rootstocks were examined. Grapevines cv. Syrah grafted onto IAC 572 and Paulsen 1103 rootstocks were monitored across a 1.1 ha vineyard in Southeastern Brazil. UAV-based sensing involved capturing images with a multispectral sensor mounted on an UAV, while proximal sensing was conducted by measuring canopy reflectance with an active sensor. The Normalized Difference Red Edge (NDRE) derived from UAV-based sensing showed the strongest correlation with stomatal conductance gs (r = 0.84, p < 0.001, pseudo-R2 = 0.73) and relative leaf water content RLWC (r = 0.73, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.60). No significant correlation was observed between the soil water parameter θ at 0–0.2 m and VI estimates from either platform (p > 0.05). Significant correlations (p < 0.001) were found between NDRE (r = 0.70, pseudo-R2 = 0,58) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) (r = 0.72, pseudo-R2 = 0,54), derived from both sensing methods. Both indices also detected differences in grapevine vigor related to rootstock influence. UAV-based measures provided stronger correlations with these traits than proximal measurements.
利用无人机和近端传感器的植被指数评估葡萄藤水分状况和砧木效应
基于无人机(UAV)的遥感和近端遥感技术是通过植被指数(VI)监测葡萄冠层的有效技术,可以评估植物生长相关因素。本研究旨在评估两种传感平台获得的VIs是否与葡萄叶和土壤水分状况相关。研究了两个平台在估算VI方面的相似性,以及它们在检测与不同砧木相关的植物生长变化方面的有效性。葡萄藤的简历。在巴西东南部的一个1.1公顷葡萄园中,对嫁接到IAC 572和Paulsen 1103砧木上的西拉进行了监测。基于无人机的遥感是通过安装在无人机上的多光谱传感器捕获图像,而近端遥感是通过使用主动传感器测量冠层反射率来进行的。无人机遥感得到的归一化差红边(NDRE)与气孔导度gs (r = 0.84, p < 0.001,伪R2 = 0.73)和叶片相对含水量RLWC (r = 0.73, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.60)相关性最强。0-0.2 m的土壤水分参数θ与两个平台的VI估计值之间没有显著相关性(p > 0.05)。两种方法得出的NDRE (r = 0.70,伪r2 = 0.58)与归一化植被指数(NDVI) (r = 0.72,伪r2 = 0.54)之间存在显著相关性(p < 0.001)。这两个指标也检测到与砧木影响有关的葡萄活力差异。与近距离测量相比,基于无人机的测量与这些特征的相关性更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
204
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: The journal ''Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment'' (RSASE) focuses on remote sensing studies that address specific topics with an emphasis on environmental and societal issues - regional / local studies with global significance. Subjects are encouraged to have an interdisciplinary approach and include, but are not limited by: " -Global and climate change studies addressing the impact of increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, CO2 emission, carbon balance and carbon mitigation, energy system on social and environmental systems -Ecological and environmental issues including biodiversity, ecosystem dynamics, land degradation, atmospheric and water pollution, urban footprint, ecosystem management and natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, typhoons, floods, landslides) -Natural resource studies including land-use in general, biomass estimation, forests, agricultural land, plantation, soils, coral reefs, wetland and water resources -Agriculture, food production systems and food security outcomes -Socio-economic issues including urban systems, urban growth, public health, epidemics, land-use transition and land use conflicts -Oceanography and coastal zone studies, including sea level rise projections, coastlines changes and the ocean-land interface -Regional challenges for remote sensing application techniques, monitoring and analysis, such as cloud screening and atmospheric correction for tropical regions -Interdisciplinary studies combining remote sensing, household survey data, field measurements and models to address environmental, societal and sustainability issues -Quantitative and qualitative analysis that documents the impact of using remote sensing studies in social, political, environmental or economic systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信