{"title":"High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost for Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study in Low- and Middle-Income Countries","authors":"Hamza Samlali MD , Najlaa Assaid PhD , Youness Khobbaizi PhD (candidate) , Omar Hanicha MSc , Mahdi Abou El Houda MSc , Sanaa Nabil MSc , Hassan Jouhadi MD , Redouane Samlali MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Prostate brachytherapy used as an adjunct to external beam radiation therapy is recognized as an effective therapeutic approach in the treatment of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. However, data remain limited in African countries, particularly Morocco. The aim of this study was to assess the oncological outcomes and tolerability of boost brachytherapy in a Moroccan cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted between 2014 and 2022. Among 128 patients treated with prostate brachytherapy, 106 with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer who received high-dose-rate brachytherapy as a boost were included. Hormone therapy was administered to 84.91% of patients. Median follow-up was 26 months. Clinical characteristics, dosimetric data, toxicity, and oncological results were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 106 patients, 59 (55.66%) had intermediate-risk cancer and 47 (44.34%) had high-risk cancer. Locally advanced stage (T3a-T3b) was observed in 43.4% of patients. At 3 years, overall survival, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) were 87%, 92%, and 78%, respectively. The 3-year BPFS was 75% for intermediate-risk cancers and 70% for high-risk cancers. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)scores 1 to 3 showed better BPFS (85%) and MFS (92%) than ISUP scores 4 to 5 (BPFS: 60%, MFS: 79%). Clinical stage was the only significant factor for MFS (<em>P</em> = .001). No grade 3 acute toxicities (genitourinary or gastrointestinal) were reported. Late grade 3 toxicities were observed in 1.89% (genitourinary) and 0.94% (gastrointestinal) of patients. Grade 2 toxicities remained low (<9%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This single-center study confirms the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. The results are encouraging, even in advanced-stage patients. Clinical stage has been shown to be the main prognostic factor for MFS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 10","pages":"Article 101861"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425001484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Prostate brachytherapy used as an adjunct to external beam radiation therapy is recognized as an effective therapeutic approach in the treatment of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. However, data remain limited in African countries, particularly Morocco. The aim of this study was to assess the oncological outcomes and tolerability of boost brachytherapy in a Moroccan cohort.
Methods and Materials
A retrospective study was conducted between 2014 and 2022. Among 128 patients treated with prostate brachytherapy, 106 with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer who received high-dose-rate brachytherapy as a boost were included. Hormone therapy was administered to 84.91% of patients. Median follow-up was 26 months. Clinical characteristics, dosimetric data, toxicity, and oncological results were analyzed.
Results
Of the 106 patients, 59 (55.66%) had intermediate-risk cancer and 47 (44.34%) had high-risk cancer. Locally advanced stage (T3a-T3b) was observed in 43.4% of patients. At 3 years, overall survival, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) were 87%, 92%, and 78%, respectively. The 3-year BPFS was 75% for intermediate-risk cancers and 70% for high-risk cancers. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)scores 1 to 3 showed better BPFS (85%) and MFS (92%) than ISUP scores 4 to 5 (BPFS: 60%, MFS: 79%). Clinical stage was the only significant factor for MFS (P = .001). No grade 3 acute toxicities (genitourinary or gastrointestinal) were reported. Late grade 3 toxicities were observed in 1.89% (genitourinary) and 0.94% (gastrointestinal) of patients. Grade 2 toxicities remained low (<9%).
Conclusions
This single-center study confirms the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. The results are encouraging, even in advanced-stage patients. Clinical stage has been shown to be the main prognostic factor for MFS.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.