Fascial and muscle ultrasound parameters unchanged after stretching or eccentric training in young men with hamstring tightness

IF 1.4 Q3 REHABILITATION
Pornpimol Muanjai , Wirasinee Srijunto , Sirawee Chaovalit , Mantas Mickevicius , Nongnuch Luangpon
{"title":"Fascial and muscle ultrasound parameters unchanged after stretching or eccentric training in young men with hamstring tightness","authors":"Pornpimol Muanjai ,&nbsp;Wirasinee Srijunto ,&nbsp;Sirawee Chaovalit ,&nbsp;Mantas Mickevicius ,&nbsp;Nongnuch Luangpon","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.08.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Hamstring tightness has been associated with significant mobility impairments and potential health issues. However, the effects of long-duration stretching (LS) on structural adaptations and joint extensibility remain unclear and underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the effects of stretching on fascia thickness (FT), muscle ultrasound characteristics, and leg flexibility in young men with hamstring inflexibility.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty-eight physically active young men (22.0 ± 1.7 years) were randomly assigned to one of four groups: LS (60s × 60), standard stretching (SS; 30s × 6), eccentric exercise (ECC), or control (CON). FT, muscle ultrasound characteristics, and leg flexibility—assessed via the straight leg raise (SLR) and knee-to-wall (KTW) tests—were measured before and after a 6-week intervention period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant increases in SLR were observed following the intervention, with improvements of 9.8° (<em>d</em> = 1.53), 5.7° (<em>d</em> = 0.96), 5.5° (<em>d</em> = 1.10), and 3.5° (<em>d</em> = 0.60) for the LS, SS, ECC, and CON groups, respectively (all p &lt; 0.05). A significant main effect of time, in the absence of a time-by-group interaction, was found for KTW, fascicle length of the biceps femoris (BF), and subcutaneous thickness of both the BF and medial gastrocnemius muscles. Conversely, no significant changes were detected in FT or echo intensity as a result of the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LS did not produce superior improvements in flexibility, fascicle length, or FT compared to SS or ECC after six weeks. A 5-min SS session is recommended as an effective, time-efficient approach for improving range of motion in individuals with mild hamstring tightness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages 286-294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225003274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Hamstring tightness has been associated with significant mobility impairments and potential health issues. However, the effects of long-duration stretching (LS) on structural adaptations and joint extensibility remain unclear and underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the effects of stretching on fascia thickness (FT), muscle ultrasound characteristics, and leg flexibility in young men with hamstring inflexibility.

Methods

Sixty-eight physically active young men (22.0 ± 1.7 years) were randomly assigned to one of four groups: LS (60s × 60), standard stretching (SS; 30s × 6), eccentric exercise (ECC), or control (CON). FT, muscle ultrasound characteristics, and leg flexibility—assessed via the straight leg raise (SLR) and knee-to-wall (KTW) tests—were measured before and after a 6-week intervention period.

Results

Significant increases in SLR were observed following the intervention, with improvements of 9.8° (d = 1.53), 5.7° (d = 0.96), 5.5° (d = 1.10), and 3.5° (d = 0.60) for the LS, SS, ECC, and CON groups, respectively (all p < 0.05). A significant main effect of time, in the absence of a time-by-group interaction, was found for KTW, fascicle length of the biceps femoris (BF), and subcutaneous thickness of both the BF and medial gastrocnemius muscles. Conversely, no significant changes were detected in FT or echo intensity as a result of the intervention.

Conclusion

LS did not produce superior improvements in flexibility, fascicle length, or FT compared to SS or ECC after six weeks. A 5-min SS session is recommended as an effective, time-efficient approach for improving range of motion in individuals with mild hamstring tightness.
筋膜和肌肉超声参数的变化后拉伸或偏心训练的年轻男性腘绳肌紧绷
腿筋紧绷与严重的活动障碍和潜在的健康问题有关。然而,长时间拉伸(LS)对结构适应性和关节可伸性的影响仍不清楚且未得到充分研究。本研究旨在探讨拉伸对年轻男性腘绳肌不灵活的筋膜厚度(FT)、肌肉超声特征和腿部灵活性的影响。方法68名年龄为22.0±1.7岁的体力活动青年男性随机分为LS组(60s × 60)、标准拉伸组(SS; 30s × 6)、偏心运动组(ECC)和对照组(CON)。FT、肌肉超声特征和腿部柔韧性——通过直腿抬高(SLR)和膝盖到墙壁(KTW)测试来评估——在6周干预期前后进行测量。结果SLR在干预后显著增加,LS、SS、ECC和CON组分别改善9.8°(d = 1.53)、5.7°(d = 0.96)、5.5°(d = 1.10)和3.5°(d = 0.60)(均p <; 0.05)。在没有时间组相互作用的情况下,时间对KTW、股二头肌束长度以及股二头肌和腓肠肌内侧肌的皮下厚度有显著的主要影响。相反,干预后FT或回波强度没有明显变化。结论:6周后,与SS或ECC相比,ls在灵活性、肌束长度或FT方面没有显著改善。5分钟的SS训练是一种有效的、时间效率高的方法,可以改善轻度腿筋紧绷的人的活动范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信