Azael Che-Mendoza, Guillermo Guillermo-May, Oscar D Kirstein, Aylin Chi-Ku, Norma Pavía-Ruz, Anuar Medina-Barreiro, Gabriela González-Olvera, Gregor Devine, Gonzalo Vazquez-Prokopec, Pablo Manrique-Saide
{"title":"Community deployment of metofluthrin emanators to control indoor Aedes aegypti: Efficacy results from a crossover trial in Yucatan, Mexico.","authors":"Azael Che-Mendoza, Guillermo Guillermo-May, Oscar D Kirstein, Aylin Chi-Ku, Norma Pavía-Ruz, Anuar Medina-Barreiro, Gabriela González-Olvera, Gregor Devine, Gonzalo Vazquez-Prokopec, Pablo Manrique-Saide","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0012883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spatial emanators (SE) are innovative tools for controlling indoor Aedes aegypti due to their relatively easy use and high efficacy. Large-scale implementation challenges include community adoption, particularly ensuring proper installation and timely replacement as SE efficacy wanes.</p><p><strong>Methodology and principal findings: </strong>We conducted a three-arm, open-label entomological cluster randomized controlled trial with a crossover design, involving 588 households, to assess the entomological effect of the community use of metofluthrin emanators. Arms were: \"no treatment\"; \"community-led deployment\" (CD), where the households were responsible for installing and replacing SE with minimal guidance; and \"managed deployment\" (MD), where the research team handled SE installation and replacement. Emanators were replaced every 3 weeks across four deployment cycles, followed by a crossover between the CD and MD arms. Indoor resting mosquitoes were collected using Prokopack aspirators, and human landing counts (HLCs) were conducted in a subset of 12 houses (4 by arm) at the first, fourth, fifth, and eighth SE replacement rounds. Values of each endpoint during all sampling periods were compared using generalized linear mixed effects models (GLMM), the coefficients of the best-fitting model estimated that SE intervention reduced the number of Ae. aegypti per house by 32.7% (95%CI = 16.2-46.0%) in the CD arm and 36.8% (21.1-49.3%) in the MD arm. HLCs accounted 74-94% efficacy (MD) and 35-79% (CD). The crossover analysis found no significant difference between periods and arms, demonstrating the community's ability to manage SE as effectively as research team, even without prior training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/significance: </strong>This trial suggests that safe, portable SE are suited to deployment by householders as a rapid response to local Aedes-borne disease outbreaks even in the presence of high pyrethroid resistance in the local Aedes population. In urban areas where effective coverage and resourcing is a challenge to control campaigns, community \"ownership\" of SE products may enhance the impact of insecticidal interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49000,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","volume":"19 9","pages":"e0012883"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012883","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Spatial emanators (SE) are innovative tools for controlling indoor Aedes aegypti due to their relatively easy use and high efficacy. Large-scale implementation challenges include community adoption, particularly ensuring proper installation and timely replacement as SE efficacy wanes.
Methodology and principal findings: We conducted a three-arm, open-label entomological cluster randomized controlled trial with a crossover design, involving 588 households, to assess the entomological effect of the community use of metofluthrin emanators. Arms were: "no treatment"; "community-led deployment" (CD), where the households were responsible for installing and replacing SE with minimal guidance; and "managed deployment" (MD), where the research team handled SE installation and replacement. Emanators were replaced every 3 weeks across four deployment cycles, followed by a crossover between the CD and MD arms. Indoor resting mosquitoes were collected using Prokopack aspirators, and human landing counts (HLCs) were conducted in a subset of 12 houses (4 by arm) at the first, fourth, fifth, and eighth SE replacement rounds. Values of each endpoint during all sampling periods were compared using generalized linear mixed effects models (GLMM), the coefficients of the best-fitting model estimated that SE intervention reduced the number of Ae. aegypti per house by 32.7% (95%CI = 16.2-46.0%) in the CD arm and 36.8% (21.1-49.3%) in the MD arm. HLCs accounted 74-94% efficacy (MD) and 35-79% (CD). The crossover analysis found no significant difference between periods and arms, demonstrating the community's ability to manage SE as effectively as research team, even without prior training.
Conclusions/significance: This trial suggests that safe, portable SE are suited to deployment by householders as a rapid response to local Aedes-borne disease outbreaks even in the presence of high pyrethroid resistance in the local Aedes population. In urban areas where effective coverage and resourcing is a challenge to control campaigns, community "ownership" of SE products may enhance the impact of insecticidal interventions.
期刊介绍:
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases publishes research devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment and control of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), as well as relevant public policy.
The NTDs are defined as a group of poverty-promoting chronic infectious diseases, which primarily occur in rural areas and poor urban areas of low-income and middle-income countries. Their impact on child health and development, pregnancy, and worker productivity, as well as their stigmatizing features limit economic stability.
All aspects of these diseases are considered, including:
Pathogenesis
Clinical features
Pharmacology and treatment
Diagnosis
Epidemiology
Vector biology
Vaccinology and prevention
Demographic, ecological and social determinants
Public health and policy aspects (including cost-effectiveness analyses).