Risk factors and leprosy incidence among contacts in Bangladesh: A multilevel analysis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0013465
Unnati Rani Saha, Abu Sufian Chowdhury, Johan Chandra Roy, Khorshed Alam, Daan Nieboer, Renate Verbiest-Richardus, Annemieke Geluk, Jan Hendrik Richardus
{"title":"Risk factors and leprosy incidence among contacts in Bangladesh: A multilevel analysis.","authors":"Unnati Rani Saha, Abu Sufian Chowdhury, Johan Chandra Roy, Khorshed Alam, Daan Nieboer, Renate Verbiest-Richardus, Annemieke Geluk, Jan Hendrik Richardus","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0013465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Maltalep trial in Bangladesh assessed whether single-dose rifampicin (SDR) given 8-12 weeks after bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination was able to prevent excess leprosy cases due to BCG in contacts of newly diagnosed leprosy patients. After previous publication of the two years follow-up results of the trial, we now review the results after five years. Furthermore, to better understand the long-term protective effects of BCG against leprosy, we conduct post-hoc in-depth secondary statistical analyses based on the prospective interventional (randomized) Maltalep trial and a non-interventional (non-randomized) cohort study that was conducted simultaneously in the same project area.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The Maltalep trial is a single center, cluster-randomized controlled trial consisting of two arms. In one arm, SDR was given 8-12 weeks after BCG vaccination (SDR+), in the other arm no SDR was given after BCG revaccination (SDR-).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Maltalep trial included 1,552 index patients. Of these, 14,986 eligible contacts were randomized into two arms SDR- and SDR+ of the trial. During the 5-year observation period, 95 and 100 new cases appeared among the contacts in two arms SDR- and SDR+ , respectively. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the leprosy incidence between the contacts of two arms of the trial. The non-intervention cohort included 554 index patients and 4,216 eligible contacts, with a total of 82 new leprosy cases appearing during the 5-year observation period. After adjustment for risk factors, the leprosy incidence was statistically significantly 1.70 [95% CI (1.03-2.80)] times higher in the contacts of the non-intervention cohort as compared to the contacts in the Maltalep trial. In the Maltalep trial, adjusted for both observed and unobserved differences, SDR- arm contacts of MB, slit skin smear (SSS) positive, blood-related (brother/sister, child, parent), and 'blood-related other' to index patients had higher risks for leprosy (AOR 2.35; 95% CI: 1.20-4.60; AOR: 6.35; CI: 2.42-16.72; AOR: 4.34; 95% CI: 1.83-10.26 and AOR: 3.07; 95% CI: 1.37-7.90) compared to PB, SSS negative, and not blood-related index patients. Household members of index patients had an increased risk (AOR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.30-7.27) for leprosy. In the SDR+ arm, leprosy incidences were statistically significantly less in the contacts of MB, SSS positive, and 'blood-related other' index patients as compared to the same kind of contacts in the SDR- arm. Leprosy incidence increased with age of contacts, with a peak at age group 45+ years (AOR:3.45; 95% CI: 1.44-8.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and recommendations: </strong>BCG vaccination of contacts is effective in preventing leprosy, overall there is no clear benefit of adding SDR after BCG to reduce the number of excess leprosy cases after vaccination. SDR after BCG, however, appears effective to prevent leprosy in contacts of MB patients, smear positive index patients, and second degree blood-related contacts of index patients. Genetic relationship is a more profound risk factor for leprosy in contacts than being a household contact only. Leprosy incidence is clustered at levels of index patients and contacts, and this should be taken into account when assessing the effect of risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49000,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","volume":"19 9","pages":"e0013465"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12412996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Maltalep trial in Bangladesh assessed whether single-dose rifampicin (SDR) given 8-12 weeks after bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination was able to prevent excess leprosy cases due to BCG in contacts of newly diagnosed leprosy patients. After previous publication of the two years follow-up results of the trial, we now review the results after five years. Furthermore, to better understand the long-term protective effects of BCG against leprosy, we conduct post-hoc in-depth secondary statistical analyses based on the prospective interventional (randomized) Maltalep trial and a non-interventional (non-randomized) cohort study that was conducted simultaneously in the same project area.

Methodology: The Maltalep trial is a single center, cluster-randomized controlled trial consisting of two arms. In one arm, SDR was given 8-12 weeks after BCG vaccination (SDR+), in the other arm no SDR was given after BCG revaccination (SDR-).

Results: The Maltalep trial included 1,552 index patients. Of these, 14,986 eligible contacts were randomized into two arms SDR- and SDR+ of the trial. During the 5-year observation period, 95 and 100 new cases appeared among the contacts in two arms SDR- and SDR+ , respectively. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the leprosy incidence between the contacts of two arms of the trial. The non-intervention cohort included 554 index patients and 4,216 eligible contacts, with a total of 82 new leprosy cases appearing during the 5-year observation period. After adjustment for risk factors, the leprosy incidence was statistically significantly 1.70 [95% CI (1.03-2.80)] times higher in the contacts of the non-intervention cohort as compared to the contacts in the Maltalep trial. In the Maltalep trial, adjusted for both observed and unobserved differences, SDR- arm contacts of MB, slit skin smear (SSS) positive, blood-related (brother/sister, child, parent), and 'blood-related other' to index patients had higher risks for leprosy (AOR 2.35; 95% CI: 1.20-4.60; AOR: 6.35; CI: 2.42-16.72; AOR: 4.34; 95% CI: 1.83-10.26 and AOR: 3.07; 95% CI: 1.37-7.90) compared to PB, SSS negative, and not blood-related index patients. Household members of index patients had an increased risk (AOR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.30-7.27) for leprosy. In the SDR+ arm, leprosy incidences were statistically significantly less in the contacts of MB, SSS positive, and 'blood-related other' index patients as compared to the same kind of contacts in the SDR- arm. Leprosy incidence increased with age of contacts, with a peak at age group 45+ years (AOR:3.45; 95% CI: 1.44-8.23).

Conclusions and recommendations: BCG vaccination of contacts is effective in preventing leprosy, overall there is no clear benefit of adding SDR after BCG to reduce the number of excess leprosy cases after vaccination. SDR after BCG, however, appears effective to prevent leprosy in contacts of MB patients, smear positive index patients, and second degree blood-related contacts of index patients. Genetic relationship is a more profound risk factor for leprosy in contacts than being a household contact only. Leprosy incidence is clustered at levels of index patients and contacts, and this should be taken into account when assessing the effect of risk factors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

孟加拉国接触者中的危险因素和麻风病发病率:一项多层次分析。
背景:孟加拉国的Maltalep试验评估了卡介苗(BCG)接种后8-12周给予单剂量利福平(SDR)是否能够预防新诊断麻风病患者接触者中卡介苗引起的过量麻风病病例。在先前发表了该试验的两年随访结果之后,我们现在在五年后审查结果。此外,为了更好地了解卡介苗对麻风病的长期保护作用,我们在同一项目区同时进行前瞻性干预性(随机)Maltalep试验和非干预性(非随机)队列研究的基础上进行了事后深入的二次统计分析。方法:Maltalep试验是一项单中心、集群随机对照试验,包括两组。一组接种卡介苗后8-12周给予SDR (SDR+),另一组接种卡介苗后不给予SDR (SDR-)。结果:Maltalep试验纳入1552例指数患者。其中,14986名符合条件的接触者被随机分为SDR-组和SDR+组。5年观察期内,SDR-和SDR+两组接触者分别新增病例95例和100例。总的来说,试验两组接触者的麻风病发病率没有统计学上的显著差异。非干预队列包括554例指标患者和4216例符合条件的接触者,5年观察期间共出现82例麻风新发病例。在调整危险因素后,与Maltalep试验中的接触者相比,非干预队列接触者的麻风病发病率高1.70 [95% CI(1.03-2.80)]倍,具有统计学意义。在Maltalep试验中,对观察到的和未观察到的差异进行调整后,SDR-手臂接触MB、裂隙皮肤涂片(SSS)阳性、血液相关(兄弟/姐妹、孩子、父母)和“血液相关的其他”指标患者与PB、SSS阴性和非血液相关指标患者相比,麻风病的风险更高(AOR 2.35; 95% CI: 1.20-4.60; AOR: 6.35; CI: 2.42-16.72; AOR: 4.34; 95% CI: 1.83-10.26和AOR: 3.07; 95% CI: 1.37-7.90)。指数患者的家庭成员患麻风病的风险增加(AOR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.30-7.27)。在SDR+组中,与SDR-组中相同类型的接触者相比,MB、SSS阳性和“与血液相关的其他”指数患者的接触者的麻风病发病率有统计学意义上的显著降低。麻风发病率随接触者年龄的增长而增加,在45岁以上年龄组达到高峰(AOR:3.45; 95% CI: 1.44-8.23)。结论和建议:接触者接种卡介苗可有效预防麻风,总体而言,卡介苗后添加SDR对减少接种后麻风多余病例数无明显益处。然而,卡介苗后SDR对MB患者、涂片阳性指数患者和指数患者的二度血液相关接触者的麻风病预防效果较好。在接触者中,遗传关系是比仅仅是家庭接触者更深刻的麻风病风险因素。麻风病发病率聚集在指数患者和接触者的水平上,在评估风险因素的影响时应考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases PARASITOLOGY-TROPICAL MEDICINE
自引率
10.50%
发文量
723
期刊介绍: PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases publishes research devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment and control of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), as well as relevant public policy. The NTDs are defined as a group of poverty-promoting chronic infectious diseases, which primarily occur in rural areas and poor urban areas of low-income and middle-income countries. Their impact on child health and development, pregnancy, and worker productivity, as well as their stigmatizing features limit economic stability. All aspects of these diseases are considered, including: Pathogenesis Clinical features Pharmacology and treatment Diagnosis Epidemiology Vector biology Vaccinology and prevention Demographic, ecological and social determinants Public health and policy aspects (including cost-effectiveness analyses).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信