Multiplicity Control in Oncology Clinical Trials With a Binary Surrogate Endpoint-Based Drop-The-Losers Design.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Weibin Zhong, Jing-Ou Liu, Chenguang Wang
{"title":"Multiplicity Control in Oncology Clinical Trials With a Binary Surrogate Endpoint-Based Drop-The-Losers Design.","authors":"Weibin Zhong, Jing-Ou Liu, Chenguang Wang","doi":"10.1002/sim.70209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Typical phase 1 oncology studies identify the maximum tolerated dose as the \"optimal\" dose for subsequent phases. With the advancement of molecular targeted agents and immunotherapies, however, evaluating two or more doses has become increasingly critical for dose selection. Such evaluation is often done in phase 2 studies in a randomized manner. In this article, we evaluate the strategy of applying an adaptive phase 2/3 seamless design for dose selection in oncology studies. Specifically, we consider the \"drop-the-losers\" design, where multiple treatment arms and a control arm are administered during the initial stage, and a more effective arm is identified for later stages by a binary surrogate endpoint such as overall response. We derive the theoretical type I error inflation scale and conduct simulation studies to illustrate the impact of various factors on the type I error inflation in such designs. Furthermore, we demonstrate the findings through the design of a lung cancer trial and introduce a software that implements the proposed design.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 20-22","pages":"e70209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Typical phase 1 oncology studies identify the maximum tolerated dose as the "optimal" dose for subsequent phases. With the advancement of molecular targeted agents and immunotherapies, however, evaluating two or more doses has become increasingly critical for dose selection. Such evaluation is often done in phase 2 studies in a randomized manner. In this article, we evaluate the strategy of applying an adaptive phase 2/3 seamless design for dose selection in oncology studies. Specifically, we consider the "drop-the-losers" design, where multiple treatment arms and a control arm are administered during the initial stage, and a more effective arm is identified for later stages by a binary surrogate endpoint such as overall response. We derive the theoretical type I error inflation scale and conduct simulation studies to illustrate the impact of various factors on the type I error inflation in such designs. Furthermore, we demonstrate the findings through the design of a lung cancer trial and introduce a software that implements the proposed design.

肿瘤临床试验中基于二元替代终点的放弃失败者设计的多重控制。
典型的1期肿瘤学研究确定最大耐受剂量为后续阶段的“最佳”剂量。然而,随着分子靶向药物和免疫疗法的发展,评估两个或多个剂量对于剂量选择变得越来越重要。这种评估通常在2期研究中以随机方式进行。在本文中,我们评估了在肿瘤学研究中应用自适应2/3期无缝设计进行剂量选择的策略。具体来说,我们考虑了“放弃失败者”设计,即在初始阶段给予多个治疗组和一个对照组,在后期通过二元替代终点(如总体反应)确定更有效的治疗组。我们推导了理论的I型误差膨胀尺度,并进行了模拟研究,以说明在这种设计中,各种因素对I型误差膨胀的影响。此外,我们通过设计肺癌试验来证明这些发现,并介绍了实现所提出设计的软件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信